Abstract
Ectopic pregnancy, defined as the implantation of a developing pregnancy outside of the endometrial cavity of the uterus, is the leading cause of early-pregnancy maternal mortality. The majority of ectopic pregnancies implant in a fallopian tube. Acute complications may include rupture of the fallopian tube or rupture of ectopic pregnancy, haemorrhage and hypovolaemic shock, or occur secondary to treatments such as emergency surgery or blood transfusions, and ultimately increase the risk of maternal death. After ectopic pregnancy, patients may experience ongoing morbidity, including chronic pain, infertility and psychological distress. Assessment of ectopic pregnancy should focus on prompt diagnosis based on clinical and investigative findings but should also reflect a patient-centred approach with acknowledgement of potential psychological distress associated with pregnancy loss and reduced future fertility. Over the last four decades, the foundations of non-invasive diagnosis have been transvaginal sonography and serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin, with diagnostic laparoscopy as a confirmatory test if surgical treatment is planned. Once diagnosed, ectopic pregnancy can be managed expectantly, treated medically with methotrexate or managed surgically. Future fertility is an important but often overlooked aspect in the management of ectopic pregnancy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access through your institution
Change institution
Buy or subscribe
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Learn more
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 1 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $119.00 per issue
Learn more
Buy this article
Purchase on SpringerLink
Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options:
Log in
Learn about institutional subscriptions
Read our FAQs
Contact customer support
Fig. 1: Anatomic locations of EP.
Fig. 2: Ultrasonography features of tubal EP.
Fig. 3: Grading of haemoperitoneum.
Fig. 4: Algorithm for initial management of early-pregnancy bleeding.
Fig. 5: Considerations for the management of ectopic pregnancy.
References
Say, L. et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 2, e323–e333 (2014).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Jurkovic, D. & Wilkinson, H. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. BMJ 342, d3397 (2011).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
ESHRE Working Group on Ectopic Pregnancy;et al. Terminology for describing normally sited and ectopic pregnancies on ultrasound: ESHRE recommendations for good practice. Hum. Reprod. Open 2020, hoaa055 (2020). Provides standardization in classification and terminology for normally sited and EP s.
ArticleGoogle Scholar
Farquhar, C. M. Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 366, 583–591 (2005).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Verhaegen, J. et al. Accuracy of single progesterone test to predict early pregnancy outcome in women with pain or bleeding: meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ 345, e6077 (2012).
ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Duncan, W. C. The inadequate corpus luteum. Reprod. Fertil. 2, C1–C7 (2021).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Committee on Practice Bulletins — Gynecology.ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 191: tubal ectopic pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 131, e65–e77 (2018).
ArticleGoogle Scholar
Zhang, S. et al. Global burden and trends of ectopic pregnancy: an observational trend study from 1990 to 2019. PLoS ONE 18, e0291313 (2023).
Google Scholar
Knight, M. MBRRACE-UK update: key messages from the UK and Ireland confidential enquiries into maternal death and morbidity 2021. Obstet. Gynaecol. 24, 79–81 (2022).
ArticleGoogle Scholar
King, J. HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia: annual surveillance report 2023. Kirby Institutehttps://www.kirby.unsw.edu.au/research/reports/asr2023 (2023).
Barnhart, K. T. Clinical practice. Ectopic pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 379–387 (2009).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: diagnosis and initial management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellencehttps://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng126 (2019). Major internationally utilized clinical practice guideline in diagnosis and management of EP and pregnancy of unknown location.
Ankum, W. M. et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Fertil. Steril. 65, 1093–1099 (1996).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Mol, B. W. J. et al. Contraception and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Contraception 52, 337–341 (1995).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, S. et al. Reproductive outcomes following ectopic pregnancy: register-based retrospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 9, e1001243 (2012).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Agdi, M. & Tulandi, T. Surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 23, 519–527 (2009).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Vermesh, M. & Presser, S. C. Reproductive outcome after linear salpingostomy for ectopic gestation: a prospective 3-year follow-up. Fertil. Steril. 57, 682–684 (1992).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Pereira, G. D. et al. Fertility outcome after systemic methotrexate and laparoscopic salpingostomy for tubal pregnancy. Lancet 353, 724–725 (1999).
ArticleGoogle Scholar
Moeller, L. B. K. et al. Success and spontaneous pregnancy rates following systemic methotrexate versus laparoscopic surgery for tubal pregnancies: a randomized trial. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 88, 1331–1337 (2009).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, H. et al. Fertility after ectopic pregnancy: the DEMETER randomized trial. Hum. Reprod. 28, 1247–1253 (2013).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Mol, F. et al. Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 383, 1483–1489 (2014).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Skjeldestad, F. E., Hadgu, A. & Eriksson, N. Epidemiology of repeat ectopic pregnancy: a population-based prospective cohort study. Obstet. Gynecol. 91, 129–135 (1998).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Hallatt, J. G. Repeat ectopic pregnancy: a study of 123 consecutive cases. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 122, 520–524 (1975).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
van Seeters, J. A. H. et al. Tubal anastomosis after previous sterilization: a systematic review. Hum. Reprod. Update 23, 358–370 (2017).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Yong, P. J. et al. Endometriosis and ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 27, 352–361.e2 (2020).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Marion, L. L. & Meeks, G. R. Ectopic pregnancy: history, incidence, epidemiology, and risk factors. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 55, 376–386 (2012).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Ahmad, S. F. et al. Pelvic chlamydial infection predisposes to ectopic pregnancy by upregulating integrin β1 to promote embryo-tubal attachment. eBioMedicine 29, 159–165 (2018).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Capmas, P., Suarthana, E. & Tulandi, T. Management of hydrosalpinx in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 28, 418–441 (2021).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Gaskins, A. J. et al. Demographic, lifestyle, and reproductive risk factors for ectopic pregnancy. Fertil. Steril. 110, 1328–1337 (2018).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
[No authors listed]. FSRH Guideline (March 2023) Intrauterine contraception.BMJ Sex. Reprod. Health 49 (Suppl. 1), 1–142 (2023).
Google Scholar
Backman, T. et al. Pregnancy during the use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 190, 50–54 (2004).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Taran, F.-A. et al. The diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 112, 693–704 (2015).
PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Ji, J.-S. et al. The body mass index and the risk of ectopic pregnancy: a 5-year retrospective case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 24, 143 (2024).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Perkins, K. M. et al. Risk of ectopic pregnancy associated with assisted reproductive technology in the United States, 2001–2011. Obstet. Gynecol. 125, 70–78 (2015).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Zhang, B. et al. Reduced ectopic pregnancy rate on day 5 embryo transfer compared with day 3: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 12, e0169837 (2017).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Ge, X. et al. Body mass index impacts ectopic pregnancy during in vitro fertilization: an analysis of 42,362 clinical pregnancy cycles. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 21, 105 (2023).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCASGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, S. et al. Caesarean section and subsequent ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 120, 671–680 (2013).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
de Bennetot, M. et al. Fertility after tubal ectopic pregnancy: results of a population-based study. Fertil. Steril. 98, 1271–1276.e1-3 (2012).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Chouinard, M. et al. Ectopic pregnancy and outcomes of future intrauterine pregnancy. Fertil. Steril. 112, 112–119 (2019).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Vermesh, M. & Sauer, M. V. Management of unruptured ectopic gestation by linear salpingostomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy In reply. Obstet. Gynecol. 74, 282–283 (1989).
Google Scholar
Ego, A. et al. Survival analysis of fertility after ectopic pregnancy. Fertil. Steril. 75, 560–566 (2001).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Shaw, J. L. et al. Current knowledge of the aetiology of human tubal ectopic pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. Update 16, 432–444 (2010).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCASGoogle Scholar
Siegler, A. M. in Gynecology and Obstetrics (ed. Sciarra, J. J.) Ch. 67 (J. B. Lippincott & Co., 1991).
Tubal infertility: serologic relationship to past chlamydial and gonococcal infection. World Health Organization Task Force on the Prevention and Management of Infertility. Sex. Transm. Dis. 22, 71–77 (1995).
ArticleGoogle Scholar
Li, T. C. et al. A review of 254 ectopic pregnancies in a teaching hospital in the Trent Region, 1977–1990. Hum. Reprod. 6, 1002–1007 (1991).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Tellum, T. et al. Reproductive outcome in 326 women with unicornuate uterus. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 61, 99–108 (2023).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCASGoogle Scholar
Perez Martinez, S. et al. Effect of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors on ovum transport and oviductal smooth muscle activity in the rat oviduct. J. Reprod. Fertil. 118, 111–117 (2000).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Croxatto, H. B. & Ortiz, M. E. Egg transport in the fallopian tube. Gynecol. Invest. 6, 215–225 (1975).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Eddy, C. A. & Pauerstein, C. J. Anatomy and physiology of the fallopian tube. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 23, 1177–1193 (1980).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
McComb, P. et al. The oviductal cilia and Kartagener’s syndrome. Fertil. Steril. 46, 412–416 (1986).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Lurie, M. et al. Ciliary ultrastructure of respiratory and fallopian tube epithelium in a sterile woman with Kartagener’s syndrome. Chest 95, 578–581 (1989).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Paltieli, Y. et al. High progesterone levels and ciliary dysfunction — a possible cause of ectopic pregnancy. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 17, 103–106 (2000).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCASGoogle Scholar
Ojcius, D. M. et al. Apoptosis of epithelial cells and macrophages due to infection with the obligate intracellular pathogen Chlamydia psittaci. J. Immunol. 161, 4220–4226 (1998).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Papathanasiou, A. et al. The effect of interleukin-6 on ciliary beat frequency in the human fallopian tube. Fertil. Steril. 90, 391–394 (2008).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Dominguez, F. et al. Embryonic implantation and leukocyte transendothelial migration: different processes with similar players? FASEB J. 19, 1056–1060 (2005).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Wang, X. et al. Adrenomedullin insufficiency alters macrophage activities in fallopian tube: a pathophysiologic explanation of tubal ectopic pregnancy. Mucosal Immunol. 13, 743–752 (2020).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Guney, M. et al. Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is immunohistochemically localized in tubal ectopic pregnancy. Acta Histochem. 110, 319–323 (2008).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Jansen, R. P. S. Endocrine response in the fallopian tube. Endocr. Rev. 5, 525–551 (1984).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Verhage, H. G. et al. Cyclic changes in ciliation, secretion and cell height of the oviductal epithelium in women. Am. J. Anat. 156, 505–521 (1979).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Horne, A. W. et al. Attenuated sex steroid receptor expression in fallopian tube of women with ectopic pregnancy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 94, 5146–5154 (2009).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Knoll, M. et al. Ciliary beat frequency of hamster oviducts is decreased in vitro by exposure to solutions of mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke. Biol. Reprod. 53, 29–37 (1995).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Knoll, M. & Talbot, P. Cigarette smoke inhibits oocyte cumulus complex pick-up by the oviduct in vitro independent of ciliary beat frequency. Reprod. Toxicol. 12, 57–68 (1998).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Dooley, W. M. et al. Effect of morphological type of extrauterine ectopic pregnancy on accuracy of preoperative ultrasound diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 54, 538–544 (2019).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Papaioannou, G. I. et al. Ultrasonographic prediction of early miscarriage. Hum. Reprod. 26, 1685–1692 (2011).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Andersen, A.-M. N. et al. Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. BMJ 320, 1708–1712 (2000).
ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Bouyer, J. et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France. Am. J. Epidemiol. 157, 185–194 (2003).
ArticleGoogle Scholar
Toikkanen, S., Joensuu, H. & Erkkola, R. DNA aneuploidy in ectopic pregnancy and spontaneous abortions Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 51, 9–13 (1993).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Goddijn, M. et al. Cytogenetic characteristics of ectopic pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. 11, 2769–2771 (1996).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Aljassim, F. et al. Exploring the presence of markers of decidualization in the fallopian tubes: a systematic review. Biol. Reprod. 109, 125–136 (2023).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCASGoogle Scholar
Jauniaux, E. et al. Impact of location on placentation in live tubal and cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. Placenta 108, 109–113 (2021).
ArticleGoogle Scholar
Cassik, P. et al. Factors influencing the success of conservative treatment of interstitial pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 26, 279–280 (2005).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Peppler, R. D. & Thompson, C. C. in Extrauterine Pregnancy: Clinical Diagnosis and Management (eds Stovall, T. G. & Ling, F. W.) 9–26 (McGraw-Hill, 1993).
Dooley, W. et al. Physical resolution of tubal ectopic pregnancy on ultrasound imaging following successful expectant management. Reprod. BioMed. Online 40, 880–886 (2020).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Randall, S., Buckley, C. H. & Fox, H. Placentation in the fallopian tube. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 6, 132–139 (1987).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Stock, J. R. in Extrauterine Pregnancy: Clinical Diagnosis and Management (eds Stovall, T. G. & Ling, F. W.) 65–96 (McGraw-Hill, 1993).
Rohilla, M. et al. Advanced abdominal pregnancy: a search for consensus. Review of literature along with case report. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 298, 1–8 (2018).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Poole, A., Haas, D. & Magann, E. F. Early abdominal ectopic pregnancies: a systematic review of the literature. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 74, 249–260 (2012).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Elson, C. J. et al. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy: Green-top Guideline No. 21. BJOG 123, e15–e55 (2016).
Google Scholar
van den Berg, M. M. J. et al. Early pregnancy care over time: should we promote an early pregnancy assessment unit? Reprod. BioMed. Online 31, 192–198 (2015).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Saving lives, improving mothers’ care compiled report — lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2020-22. MBRRACE-UKhttps://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/mbrrace-uk/reports/maternal-reports/maternal-report-2020-2022 (2024).
Memtsa, M. et al. Differences in the organisation of early pregnancy units and the effect of senior clinician presence, volume of patients and weekend opening on emergency hospital admissions: findings from the VESPA Study. PLoS ONE 16, e0260534 (2021).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCASGoogle Scholar
Stone, B. S. et al. Impact of point-of-care ultrasound on treatment time for ectopic pregnancy. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 49, 226–232 (2021).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Houser, M., Kandalaft, N. & Khati, N. J. Ectopic pregnancy: a resident’s guide to imaging findings and diagnostic pitfalls. Emerg. Radiol. 29, 161–172 (2022).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Augustin, G. in Acute Abdomen During Pregnancy (ed. Augustin, G.) 589–620 (Springer International Publishing, 2018).
Ackerman, T. E. et al. Interstitial line: sonographic finding in interstitial (cornual) ectopic pregnancy. Radiology 189, 83–87 (1993).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Solangon, S. A., Naftalin, J. & Jurkovic, D. Ovarian ectopic pregnancy: clinical characteristics, ultrasound diagnosis and management. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 63, 815–823 (2024).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Parker, V. L. et al. Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 294, 19–27 (2016).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, N. & Tulandi, T. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 24, 731–738 (2017).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Nijjar, S., Jauniaux, E. & Jurkovic, D. Surgical evacuation of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 89, 731–738 (2023).
Google Scholar
Singh, S. Diagnosis and management of cervical ectopic pregnancy. J. Hum. Reprod. Sci. 6, 273–276 (2013).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Leeman, L. M. & Wendland, C. L. Cervical ectopic pregnancy. Diagnosis with endovaginal ultrasound examination and successful treatment with methotrexate. Arch. Fam. Med. 9, 72–77 (2000).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Shen, Z. et al. Minimally-invasive management of intramural ectopic pregnancy: an eight-case series and literature review. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 253, 180–186 (2020).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Nijjar, S. et al. Imaging in gynecological disease (25): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of intramural pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 62, 279–289 (2023).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Maleki, A. et al. The rising incidence of heterotopic pregnancy: current perspectives and associations with in-vitro fertilization. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 266, 138–144 (2021).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Reece, E. A. et al. Combined intrauterine and extrauterine gestations: a review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 146, 323–330 (1983).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Dimitry, E. S. et al. Nine cases of heterotopic pregnancies in 4 years of in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 53, 107–110 (1990).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Santos-Ribeiro, S., Tournaye, H. & Polyzos, N. P. Trends in ectopic pregnancy rates following assisted reproductive technologies in the UK: a 12-year nationwide analysis including 160 000 pregnancies. Hum. Reprod. 31, 393–402 (2016).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Barnhart, K. et al. Pregnancy of unknown location: a consensus statement of nomenclature, definitions and outcome. Fertil. Steril. 95, 855–866 (2011).
ArticleGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, E., Rosenberg, R. & Prine, L. Ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis and management. Am. Fam. Physician 101, 599–606 (2020).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Parks, J. K. et al. Systemic hypotension is a late marker of shock after trauma: a validation study of Advanced Trauma Life Support principles in a large national sample. Am. J. Surg. 192, 727–731 (2006).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Thornton, J. Women are at serious risk of harm from late diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. BMJ 368, m924 (2020).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Crochet, J. R., Bastian, L. A. & Chireau, M. V. Does this woman have an ectopic pregnancy? The rational clinical examination systematic review. JAMA 309, 1722–1729 (2013).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Mol, B. W. J. et al. Should patients who are suspected of having an ectopic pregnancy undergo physical examination? Fertil. Steril. 71, 155–157 (1999).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
CRASH-3 Trial Collaborators. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, disability, vascular occlusive events and other morbidities in patients with acute traumatic brain injury (CRASH-3): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 394, 1713–1723 (2019).
ArticleGoogle Scholar
Shakur, H. et al. Effect of early tranexamic acid administration on mortality, hysterectomy, and other morbidities in women with post-partum haemorrhage (WOMAN): an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 389, 2105–2116 (2017).
ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
Kivikoski, A. I., Martin, C. M. & Smeltzer, J. S. Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy: a comparative study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 163, 123–128 (1990).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Kadar, N., DeVore, G. & Romero, R. Discriminatory hCG zone: its use in the sonographic evaluation for ectopic pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 58, 156–161 (1981).
PubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Mol, B. W., van der Veen, F. & Bossuyt, P. M. Symptom-free women at increased risk of ectopic pregnancy: should we screen? Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 81, 661–672 (2002).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kirk, E. et al. The diagnostic effectiveness of an initial transvaginal scan in detecting ectopic pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. 22, 2824–2828 (2007).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Condous, G. et al. The accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy prior to surgery. Hum. Reprod. 20, 1404–1409 (2005).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. L. & Doubilet, P. M. Transvaginal sonography for diagnosing ectopic pregnancy: positivity criteria and performance characteristics. J. Ultrasound Med. 13, 259–266 (1994).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Kirk, E. & Bourne, T. Diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy with ultrasound. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 23, 501–508 (2009).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Levi, C. S. et al. Endovaginal US: demonstration of cardiac activity in embryos of less than 5.0 mm in crown-rump length. Radiology 176, 71–74 (1990).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Nadim, B. et al. Morphological ultrasound types known as ‘blob’ and ‘bagel’ signs should be reclassified from suggesting probable to indicating definite tubal ectopic pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 51, 543–549 (2018).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Perriera, L. & Reeves, M. F. Ultrasound criteria for diagnosis of early pregnancy failure and ectopic pregnancy. Semin. Reprod. Med. 26, 373–382 (2008).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Richardson, A. et al. Accuracy of first-trimester ultrasound in diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy in the absence of an obvious extrauterine embryo: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 47, 28–37 (2016).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Cole, L. A. New discoveries on the biology and detection of human chorionic gonadotropin. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 7, 8 (2009).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Bergh, T. et al. Deliveries and children born after in-vitro fertilisation in Sweden 1982–95: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 354, 1579–1585 (1999).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Cole, L. A. et al. Detection of the free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) in cultures of normal and malignant trophoblast cells, pregnancy sera, and sera of patients with choriocarcinoma. Endocrinology 113, 1176–1178 (1983).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Franchimont, P., Reuter, A. & Gaspard, U. Ectopic production of human chorionic gonadotropin and its alpha- and beta-subunits. Curr. Top. Exp. Endocrinol. 3, 201–216 (1978).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Romero, R. et al. The value of serial human chorionic gonadotropin testing as a diagnostic tool in ectopic pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 155, 392–394 (1986).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Mol, B. W. et al. Diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril. 68, 1027–1032 (1997).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Mol, B. W. J. et al. Serum human chorionic gonadotropin measurement in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy when transvaginal sonography is inconclusive. Fertil. Steril. 70, 972–981 (1998).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Ankum, W. M. et al. Pregnancy: transvaginal sonography and human chorionic gonadotrophin measurements in suspected ectopic pregnancy: a detailed analysis of a diagnostic approach. Hum. Reprod. 8, 1307–1311 (1993).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
da Costa Soares, R. et al. Increment in β-hCG in the 48-h period prior to treatment: a new variable predictive of therapeutic success in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy with methotrexate. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 278, 319–324 (2008).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Kirk, E. et al. Ectopic pregnancy: using the hCG ratio to select women for expectant or medical management. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 90, 264–272 (2011).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Condous, G. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of varying discriminatory zones for the prediction of ectopic pregnancy in women with a pregnancy of unknown location. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 26, 770–775 (2005).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Condous, G. et al. Human chorionic gonadotrophin and progesterone levels in pregnancies of unknown location. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 86, 351–357 (2004).
ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
van Mello, N. M. et al. Diagnostic value of serum hCG on the outcome of pregnancy of unknown location: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 18, 603–607 (2012).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Ku, C. W. et al. Serum progesterone distribution in normal pregnancies compared to pregnancies complicated by threatened miscarriage from 5 to 13 weeks gestation: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 18, 360 (2018).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCASGoogle Scholar
Ku, C. W. et al. Gestational age-specific normative values and determinants of serum progesterone through the first trimester of pregnancy. Sci. Rep. 11, 4161 (2021).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCASGoogle Scholar
Senapati, S. & Barnhart, K. T. Biomarkers for ectopic pregnancy and pregnancy of unknown location. Fertil. Steril. 99, 1107–1116 (2013).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCASGoogle Scholar
Condous, G. et al. Prediction of ectopic pregnancy in women with a pregnancy of unknown location. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 29, 680–687 (2007).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Van Calster, B. et al. Rationalizing the management of pregnancies of unknown location: temporal and external validation of a risk prediction model on 1962 pregnancies. Hum. Reprod. 28, 609–616 (2013).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Bobdiwala, S. et al. Diagnostic protocols for the management of pregnancy of unknown location: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 126, 190–198 (2018).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Christodoulou, E. et al. External validation of models to predict the outcome of pregnancies of unknown location: a multicentre cohort study. BJOG 128, 552–562 (2021).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Kyriacou, C. et al. Updating M6 pregnancy of unknown location risk-prediction model including evaluation of clinical factors. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 63, 408–418 (2024).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Shehab, Q. J. et al. Negative histology in surgically managed tubal ectopic pregnancy. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 157, 719–722 (2022).
ArticleGoogle Scholar
Wedderburn, C. et al. Economic evaluation of diagnosing and excluding ectopic pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. 25, 328–333 (2010).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Solangon, S. A. et al. Methotrexate vs expectant management for treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: an individual participant data meta‐analysis. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 102, 1159–1175 (2023).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCASGoogle Scholar
Hajenius, P. J. et al. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2007, CD000324 (2007). Main source of evidence on treatment of tubal EP. Update expected end of 2024.
PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Horne, A. W. et al. Combination of gefitinib and methotrexate to treat tubal ectopic pregnancy (GEM3): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 401, 655–663 (2023).
ArticleCASGoogle Scholar
Avcioğlu, S. N. et al. Predictors of success of different treatment modalities for management of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. Int. 2014, 423708 (2014).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Skubisz, M. et al. Using a decline in serum hCG between days 0–4 to predict ectopic pregnancy treatment success after single-dose methotrexate: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 13, 30 (2013).
ArticlePubMed CentralCASGoogle Scholar
Menon, S., Colins, J. & Barnhart, K. T. Establishing a human chorionic gonadotropin cutoff to guide methotrexate treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review. Fertil. Steril. 87, 481–484 (2007).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, S. C. et al. Early (days 1–4) post-treatment serum hCG level changes predict single-dose methotrexate treatment success in tubal ectopic pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. 38, 1261–1267 (2023).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCASGoogle Scholar
Davenport, M. J. et al. Time to resolution of tubal ectopic pregnancy following methotrexate treatment: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE 17, e0268741 (2022).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCASGoogle Scholar
Svirsky, R. et al. The safety of conception occurring shortly after methotrexate treatment of an ectopic pregnancy. Reprod. Toxicol. 27, 85–87 (2009).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Al Wattar, B. H. et al. Effectiveness of treatment options for tubal ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BJOG 131, 5–14 (2024).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Laganà, A. S. et al. Efficacy of letrozole for the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 299, 322–328 (2024).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Franik, S. et al. Aromatase inhibitors (letrozole) for ovulation induction in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2022, CD010287 (2022).
PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Song, H. et al. Aromatase inhibitors for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013, CD009505 (2013).
PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Gazvani, M. R. et al. Mifepristone in combination with methotrexate for the medical treatment of tubal pregnancy: a randomized, controlled trial. Hum. Reprod. 13, 1987–1990 (1998).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Rozenberg, P. et al. Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancies: a randomized clinical trial comparing methotrexate–mifepristone and methotrexate–placebo. Hum. Reprod. 18, 1802–1808 (2003).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Perdu, M. et al. Treating ectopic pregnancy with the combination of mifepristone and methotrexate: a phase II nonrandomized study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 179, 640–643 (1998).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Hamel, C. et al. Mifepristone followed by misoprostol compared with placebo followed by misoprostol as medical treatment for early pregnancy loss (the Triple M trial): a double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial. eClinicalMedicine 32, 100716 (2021).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Chu, J. J. et al. Mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for the management of missed miscarriage (MifeMiso): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 396, 770–778 (2020).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCASGoogle Scholar
Oltman, J. et al. Have we overlooked the role of mifepristone for the medical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy? Hum. Reprod. 38, 1445–1448 (2023).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCASGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, K., Baartz, D. & Khoo, S. K. Management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy with intravenous methotrexate: an extended study of a standardised regimen. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 55, 176–180 (2015).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hajenius, P. J. et al. Serum human chorionic gonadotropin clearance curves in patients with interstitial pregnancy treated with systemic methotrexate. Fertil. Steril. 66, 723–728 (1996).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Alkatout, I. et al. The development of laparoscopy — a historical overview. Front. Surg. 8, 176–180 (2021).
ArticleGoogle Scholar
Gray, D. T. et al. A cost-effectiveness study of a randomised trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 345, 799442 (1995).
ArticleGoogle Scholar
Lundorff, P. et al. Laparoscopic surgery in ectopic pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 70, 343–348 (1991).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Graczykowski, J. W. & Mishell, D. R. Methotrexate prophylaxis for persistent ectopic pregnancy after conservative treatment by salpingostomy. Obstet. Gynecol. 89, 118–122 (1997).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Nieuwkerk, P. T. et al. Systemic methotrexate therapy versus laparoscopic salpingostomy in tubal pregnancy. Part II. Patient preferences for systemic methotrexate. Fertil. Steril. 70, 518–522 (1998).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Spillane, N., Meaney, S. & O’Donoghue, K. Irish women’s experience of Ectopic pregnancy. Sex. Reprod. Healthc. 16, 154–159 (2018).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Ren, N. et al. Research progress on psychological distress in patients with ectopic pregnancy in China. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 19, 1633–1639 (2023).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Levin, G. et al. Success rate of methotrexate treatment for recurrent vs. primary ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 40, 507–511 (2020).
ArticlePubMedCASGoogle Scholar
Mol, B. W. et al. Fertility after salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women, with tubal pregnancy; an individual patient data meta-analysis. Human Reprod. 33 (Suppl. 1), i24–i25 (2018).
Google Scholar
Déchaud, H. et al. Does previous salpingectomy improve implantation and pregnancy rates in patients with severe tubal factor infertility who are undergoing in vitro fertilization? A pilot prospective randomized study. Fertil. Steril. 69, 1020–1025 (1998).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Chong, K. Y. et al. A core outcome set for future research in ectopic pregnancy: an international consensus development study. Fertil. Steril. 119, 804–812 (2023).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Brincat, M., Bryant-Smith, A. & Holland, T. K. The diagnosis and management of interstitial ectopic pregnancies: a review. Gynecol. Surg. 16, 2 (2019).
ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bo, W., Qianyu, Z. & Mo, L. Global, regional, and national burden of ectopic pregnancy: a 30-year observational database study. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2023, 3927337 (2023).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Rowley, J. et al. Chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis and syphilis: global prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016. Bull. World Health Organ. 97, 548–562P (2019).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Giuliano, A. R. et al. High HIV, HPV, and STI prevalence among young Western Cape, South African women: EVRI HIV prevention preparedness trial. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 68, 227–235 (1999).
ArticleGoogle Scholar
Aliyu, L. D. et al. Ultrasound in Africa: what can really be done? J. Perinat. Med. 44, 119–123 (2016).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Nzaumvila, D. K., Govender, I. & Ogunbanjo, G. A. An audit of the management of ectopic pregnancies in a district hospital, Gauteng, South Africa. Afr. J. Prim. Health Care Fam. Med. 10, e1–e8 (2018).
ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
de Waard, L. et al. Retrospective review of the medical management of ectopic pregnancies with methotrexate at a South African tertiary hospital. South Afr. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 20, 84–87 (2014).
ArticleGoogle Scholar
Ahmat, A. et al. Estimating the threshold of health workforce densities towards universal health coverage in Africa. BMJ Glob. Health 7, e008310 (2022).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Skilled health personnel — data by WHO region. World Health Organizationhttps://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.HWF10WHOREGv?lang=en (2024).
Barnhart, K. T. et al. Effect of an active vs expectant management strategy on successful resolution of pregnancy among patients with a persisting pregnancy of unknown location: the ACT or NOT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 326, 390–400 (2021).
ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Download references
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Krystle Y. Chong & Ben W. Mol
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
Liesl de Waard
The Ectopic Pregnancy Trust, London, UK
Munira Oza
Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Madelon van Wely & Ben W. Mol
Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
Davor Jurkovic & Maria Memtsa
Aberdeen Centre for Women’s Health Research, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Andrea Woolner & Ben W. Mol
Authors
Krystle Y. Chong
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
2. Liesl de Waard
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
3. Munira Oza
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
4. Madelon van Wely
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
5. Davor Jurkovic
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
6. Maria Memtsa
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
7. Andrea Woolner
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
8. Ben W. Mol
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
Contributions
Introduction (K.Y.C.); Epidemiology (B.W.M., M.v.W. and L.d.W.); Mechanisms/pathophysiology (D.J.); Diagnosis, screening and prevention (K.Y.C.); Management (K.Y.C. and A.W.); Quality of life (B.W.M. and M.O.); Outlook (M.M.). B.W.M. supervised the project. All authors provided critical feedback and contributed to the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Ben W. Mol.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
M.v.W. reports leading the Netherlands Satellite of the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group. B.W.M. reports grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Guerbet and Merck, outside of the submitted work. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Disease Primers thanks C. E. Varner, A. Rottenstreich, N. Pereira and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark
Cite this article
Chong, K.Y., de Waard, L., Oza, M. et al. Ectopic pregnancy. Nat Rev Dis Primers 10, 94 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-024-00579-x
Download citation
Accepted:11 November 2024
Published:12 December 2024
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-024-00579-x
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Get shareable link
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Copy to clipboard
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative