nature.com

An RNA editing strategy rescues gene duplication in a mouse model of MECP2 duplication syndrome and nonhuman primates

Abstract

Duplication of methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) gene causes MECP2 duplication syndrome (MDS). To normalize the duplicated MECP2 in MDS, we developed a high-fidelity Cas13Y (hfCas13Y) system capable of targeting the MECP2 (hfCas13Y-gMECP2) messenger RNA for degradation and reducing protein levels in the brain of humanized MECP2 transgenic mice. Moreover, the intracerebroventricular adeno-associated virus (AAV) delivery of hfCas13Y-gMECP2 in newborn or adult MDS mice restored dysregulated gene expression and improved behavior deficits. Notably, treatment with AAV9-hfCas13Y-gMECP2 extended the median survival of MECP2 transgenic mice from 156.5 to 226 d. Furthermore, studies with monkeys showed a single injection of AAV9-hfCas13Y-gMECP2 was sufficient to drive robust expression of hfCas13Y in widespread brain regions, with MECP2 knockdown efficiency reaching 52.19 ± 0.03% and significantly decreased expression of biomarker gene GDF11. Our results demonstrate that the RNA-targeting hfCas13Y-gMECP2 system is an effective intervention for MDS, providing a potential strategy for treating other dosage-sensitive diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Change institution

Buy or subscribe

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

$29.99 / 30 days

cancel any time

Learn more

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$209.00 per year

only $17.42 per issue

Learn more

Buy this article

Purchase on SpringerLink

Instant access to full article PDF

Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Log in

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Read our FAQs

Contact customer support

Fig. 1: Screening of hfCas13Y variants and efficient gRNAs for MECP2 RNA knockdown.

Fig. 2: MECP2 in vivo knockdown efficiency mediated by the AAV-hfCas13Y RNA editing system.

Fig. 3: Knockdown of MeCP2 by the AAV-PHP.eB-hfCas13Y v3-mediated RNA editing system rescues impaired behaviors of MECP2 TG mice.

Fig. 4: AAV9-mediated delivery of hfCas13Y normalizes MECP2 levels and rescues behavioral deficits in the P1 MECP2 TG mice.

Fig. 5: AAV9-mediated delivery of hfCas13Y v3 via ICV injection normalizes MECP2 levels in a single neuron in the cortex of the MECP2 TG mouse model.

Fig. 6: AAV9-mediated delivery of hfCas13Y-gMECP2 via ICV injection normalized MECP2 levels and mitigated behavioral deficits in 2-month-old MECP2 TG mice.

Fig. 7: AAV9-mediated delivery of hfCas13Y v3 via ICV injection decreased MECP2 levels in the brain of WT male cynomolgus monkeys.

Data availability

Deep-seq data are deposited to the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (accession numbers: PRJNA1101724 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA1101724), PRJNA1102504 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA1102504) and PRJNA1101197 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA1101197)), and plasmids are available from the corresponding authors upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

No code was written in the study.

References

Guy, J., Cheval, H., Selfridge, J. & Bird, A. The role of MeCP2 in the brain. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27, 631–652 (2011).

ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

Chao, H. T. & Zoghbi, H. Y. MeCP2: only 100% will do. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 176–177 (2012).

ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

Leonard, H., Cobb, S. & Downs, J. Clinical and biological progress over 50 years in Rett syndrome. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 13, 37–51 (2017).

ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

Van Esch, H. et al. Duplication of the MECP2 region is a frequent cause of severe mental retardation and progressive neurological symptoms in males. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 77, 442–453 (2005).

ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Lugtenberg, D. et al. Structural variation in Xq28: MECP2 duplications in 1% of patients with unexplained XLMR and in 2% of male patients with severe encephalopathy. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 17, 444–453 (2009).

ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

Takeguchi, R. et al. Early diagnosis of MECP2 duplication syndrome: insights from a nationwide survey in Japan. J. Neurol. Sci. 422, 117321 (2021).

ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

Pascual-Alonso, A., Martinez-Monseny, A. F., Xiol, C. & Armstrong, J. MECP2-related disorders in males. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 9610 (2021).

ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Shahbazian, M. D. & Zoghbi, H. Y. Rett syndrome and MeCP2: linking epigenetics and neuronal function. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 71, 1259–1272 (2002).

ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Ramocki, M. B. & Zoghbi, H. Y. Failure of neuronal homeostasis results in common neuropsychiatric phenotypes. Nature 455, 912–918 (2008).

ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Nageshappa, S. et al. Altered neuronal network and rescue in a human MECP2 duplication model. Mol. Psychiatry 21, 178–188 (2016).

ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

Marafi, D. et al. Spectrum and time course of epilepsy and the associated cognitive decline in MECP2 duplication syndrome. Neurology 92, e108–e114 (2019).

ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Ak, M. et al. Assessing the burden on caregivers of MECP2 duplication syndrome. Pediatr. Neurol. 133, 1–8 (2022).

ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Peters, S. U. et al. Phenotypic features in MECP2 duplication syndrome: effects of age. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 185, 362–369 (2021).

ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

Shao, Y. et al. Antisense oligonucleotide therapy in a humanized mouse model of MECP2 duplication syndrome. Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eaaz7785 (2021).

ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Sztainberg, Y. et al. Reversal of phenotypes in MECP2 duplication mice using genetic rescue or antisense oligonucleotides. Nature 528, 123–126 (2015).

ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Yu, B. et al. Reversal of social recognition deficit in adult mice with MECP2 duplication via normalization of MeCP2 in the medial prefrontal cortex. Neurosci. Bull. 36, 570–584 (2020).

ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Xu, C. et al. Programmable RNA editing with compact CRISPR-Cas13 systems from uncultivated microbes. Nat. Methods 18, 499–506 (2021).

ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

Kannan, S. et al. Compact RNA editors with small Cas13 proteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 194–197 (2021).

ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Tong, H. et al. High-fidelity Cas13 variants for targeted RNA degradation with minimal collateral effects. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 108–119 (2023).

ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

Pacheco, N. L. et al. RNA sequencing and proteomics approaches reveal novel deficits in the cortex of Mecp2-deficient mice, a model for Rett syndrome. Mol. Autism 8, 56 (2017).

ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Brito, D. V. C., Gulmez Karaca, K., Kupke, J., Frank, L. & Oliveira, A. M. M. MeCP2 gates spatial learning-induced alternative splicing events in the mouse hippocampus. Mol. Brain 13, 156 (2020).

ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Renthal, W. et al. Characterization of human mosaic Rett syndrome brain tissue by single-nucleus RNA sequencing. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1670–1679 (2018).

ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Gogliotti, R. G. et al. Total RNA sequencing of Rett syndrome autopsy samples identifies the M4 muscarinic receptor as a novel therapeutic target. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 365, 291–300 (2018).

ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Heckman, L. D., Chahrour, M. H. & Zoghbi, H. Y. Rett-causing mutations reveal two domains critical for MeCP2 function and for toxicity in MECP2 duplication syndrome mice. eLife 3, e02676 (2014).

ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Collins, A. L. et al. Mild overexpression of MeCP2 causes a progressive neurological disorder in mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13, 2679–2689 (2004).

ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

Ramocki, M. B., Tavyev, Y. J. & Peters, S. U. The MECP2 duplication syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 152A, 1079–1088 (2010).

ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Chahrour, M. et al. MeCP2, a key contributor to neurological disease, activates and represses transcription. Science 320, 1224–1229 (2008).

ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Morikawa, M., Derynck, R. & Miyazono, K. TGF-β and the TGF-β family: context-dependent roles in cell and tissue physiology. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8, a021873 (2016).

ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Bajikar, S. S. et al. MeCP2 regulates Gdf11, a dosage-sensitive gene critical for neurological function. eLife 12, e83806 (2023).

ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Law, C. W., Chen, Y., Shi, W. & Smyth, G. K. voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol. 15, R29 (2014).

ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).

ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Huang da, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57 (2009).

ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Huang da, W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 1–13 (2009).

ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Challis, R. C. et al. Systemic AAV vectors for widespread and targeted gene delivery in rodents. Nat. Protoc. 14, 379–414 (2019).

ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

Torregrosa, T. et al. Use of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated disruption of CNS cell type genes to profile transduction of AAV by neonatal intracerebroventricular delivery in mice. Gene Ther. 28, 456–468 (2021).

ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Swiech, L. et al. In vivo interrogation of gene function in the mammalian brain using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 102–106 (2015).

ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the laboratory animal center at HuidaGene Therapeutics Inc. for technical support. H.Y. was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 31925016 and 82021001); the National Science and Technology Innovation 2030 Major Program (grant no. 2021ZD0200900); the Basic Frontier Scientific Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences From 0 to 1 original innovation project (grant no. ZDBS-LY-SM001); and the Project of Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission (grant no. 23HC1401100). C.X. was sponsored by the Lingang Laboratory intramural fund and the Shanghai City Committee of Science and Technology Project (grant no. 22QA1412300). X. Wang was sponsored by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant no. 2023M741325).

Author information

Author notes

These authors contributed equally: Dong Yang, Xiaoqing Wu, Yinan Yao, Mengsi Duan.

Authors and Affiliations

HuidaGene Therapeutics Inc., Shanghai, China

Dong Yang, Xiaoqing Wu, Mengsi Duan, Xing Wang, Guoling Li, Aiguo Guo, Meixian Wu, Jin Zheng, Tong Li, Alvin Luk, Xuan Yao, Linyu Shi & Hui Yang

Institute of Neuroscience, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China

Yinan Yao, Yuanhua Liu, Renxia Zhang & Hui Yang

Lingang Laboratory, Shanghai, China

Chunlong Xu

Shanghai Research Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Technology, Shanghai, China

Chunlong Xu & Hui Yang

Authors

Dong Yang

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

2. Xiaoqing Wu

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

3. Yinan Yao

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

4. Mengsi Duan

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

5. Xing Wang

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

6. Guoling Li

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

7. Aiguo Guo

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

8. Meixian Wu

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

9. Yuanhua Liu

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

10. Jin Zheng

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

11. Renxia Zhang

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

12. Tong Li

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

13. Alvin Luk

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

14. Xuan Yao

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

15. Linyu Shi

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

16. Chunlong Xu

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

17. Hui Yang

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

Contributions

D.Y., L.S., C.X. and H.Y. conceived the project and experiments. D.Y., X. Wu, Y.Y., M.D., X. Wang, G.L., A.G., M.W., J.Z. and R.Z. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. Y.L. performed the bioinformatic analyses. D.Y., Y.Y., C.X., A.L., T.L. and H.Y. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. H.Y. and X.Y. supervised research and acquired funding.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xuan Yao, Linyu Shi, Chunlong Xu or Hui Yang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

H.Y. is the founder of HuidaGene Therapeutics Inc. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Neuroscience thanks Bence György, Huda Zoghbi and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–17, Tables 1–5, Results 1–3, Discussion, Methods and References.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 1. Statistical source data and unprocessed western blot for the supplementary figures.

Source data

Source Data Figs. 1–7

Source Data Fig. 1. Statistical source data and unprocessed western blot. Source Data Fig. 2. Statistical source data and unprocessed western blot. Source Data Fig. 3. Statistical source data. Source Data Fig. 4. Statistical source data. Source Data Fig. 5. Statistical source data. Source Data Fig. 6. Statistical source data and unprocessed western blot. Source Data Fig. 7. Statistical source data and unprocessed western blot.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, D., Wu, X., Yao, Y. et al. An RNA editing strategy rescues gene duplication in a mouse model of MECP2 duplication syndrome and nonhuman primates. Nat Neurosci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01838-6

Download citation

Received:27 July 2023

Accepted:24 October 2024

Published:12 December 2024

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-024-01838-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Get shareable link

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Copy to clipboard

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Read full news in source page