Arsenal manager Mikel Arteta has weighed in on the possibility of shorter football matches becoming a reality, as football’s governing bodies continue to explore ways to modernize the game. The Spaniard acknowledged that such a shift could be on the horizon and pointed to recent changes in the sport as an indication of how football is evolving.
Speaking about the potential new rule, Arteta said, “It’s a real possibility to see shorter football games in the near future. We have changed the Champions League format, so it’s a very real possibility.” His comments underline the increasing willingness of football authorities to reimagine traditional aspects of the game in response to modern challenges and audience preferences.
LONDON, ENGLAND – SEPTEMBER 28: Mikel Arteta, Manager of Arsenal, enters the pitch for the second half during the Premier League match between Arsenal FC and Leicester City FC at Emirates Stadium on September 28, 2024 in London, England. (Photo by Stuart MacFarlane/Arsenal FC via Getty Images)
The idea of reducing match durations is not new but has gained traction in recent years as football leaders look to adapt to changing viewing habits. With the growing influence of younger audiences and the need to maintain high levels of engagement, shorter matches could address concerns over game length and pacing.
The suggestion follows broader changes in football, including the introduction of the new Champions League format, which adds more games to the competition. The so-called “Swiss model,” set to begin in 2024/25, increases the group-stage matches from six to eight per team, intensifying player workloads. Shorter games could help alleviate physical strain on players while maintaining the sport’s commercial appeal.
Arteta’s remarks suggest he is open to the idea, though he stopped short of fully endorsing the concept. His measured response reflects the broader uncertainty surrounding such a dramatic change in football’s structure.
Implementing shorter football games would require significant adjustments across the sport. The traditional 90-minute format has been central to football for over a century, and any alteration would likely face resistance from players, managers, and fans alike. Questions would also arise about how shorter games might affect tactical approaches, player statistics, and historical comparisons.
One argument against shortening matches is that it could diminish the drama and unpredictability that often unfolds in the closing stages. Late goals have become an iconic part of the game, and reducing game time might alter its flow and intensity.
LONDON, ENGLAND – SEPTEMBER 28: Gabriel of Arsenal looks on during the Premier League match between Arsenal FC and Leicester City FC at Emirates Stadium on September 28, 2024 in London, England. (Photo by Stuart MacFarlane/Arsenal FC via Getty Images)
On the other hand, supporters of the idea argue that shorter games could reduce fatigue for players involved in congested schedules, particularly in a footballing landscape that demands participation in domestic, continental, and international competitions. This would also create a more compact and engaging viewing experience for fans, particularly casual or younger audiences accustomed to faster-paced entertainment.
As football continues to evolve, the balance between tradition and modernization will remain a contentious issue. While changes like the new Champions League format indicate a willingness to innovate, altering the length of matches would mark an unprecedented shift. Arteta’s acknowledgment of the idea suggests it is being taken seriously at the highest levels of the sport.
Whether shorter matches become reality or remain a hypothetical discussion, the dialogue highlights the challenges football faces in keeping pace with a rapidly changing world while respecting its storied heritage.