Manchester United are entering a pivotal summer, one that could redefine their attacking fortunes. Last season exposed deep-rooted issues in the final third, an area where raw potential and promise failed to translate into goals. Despite flashes of promise from Rasmus Højlund and persistent links to Joshua Zirkzee, the end product remained inconsistent. The gap between United and the Premier League’s elite remained glaring, and it was clear that a more seasoned and clinical presence was required up front.
In this context, the club’s interest in Ollie Watkins is more than just speculative. As reported by Fichajes, the Aston Villa and England striker is being seriously considered as a key target. Watkins represents everything United have been missing: Premier League-proven, sharp in front of goal, intelligent in movement, and relentless in work rate. His experience under pressure and ability to contribute both in buildup and finishing could bring immediate balance to United’s often-disjointed attack.
This pursuit comes as United also keep tabs on Viktor Gyökeres, a younger and more physical forward with strong numbers in Portugal. However, Watkins brings a different level of guarantee, especially in terms of adapting quickly to Ten Hag’s system and the demands of English football.
Should United splash out for Watkins to solve their striker woes, or stick with Højlund and Zirkzee?
With Champions League football no longer a guarantee, United cannot afford another gamble. A forward like Watkins offers something the current squad lacks: a consistent and tested performer who can shoulder responsibility and deliver when it matters. If the board are serious about bridging the gap to the top, investing in such reliability may be non-negotiable.
Watkins, with his consistent Premier League record, represents exactly the kind of immediate-impact player Manchester United have lacked in recent seasons. At 29, he brings maturity, sharp decision-making, and a scoring instinct honed in one of the most physically demanding leagues in the world. His game is not built solely on pace or flair—traits that can fade or be erratic—but on positioning, awareness, and a relentless work ethic, making him a safe bet for a side in need of certainty up front.
But certainty comes at a cost. Aston Villa are under no pressure to sell. Watkins is not only their primary goal threat but also a tactical cornerstone of Unai Emery’s system. Releasing him would disrupt a team that is building on stability and ambition. United, therefore, would have to table a convincing offer, financially and in terms of the player’s career trajectory.
Is Watkins worth breaking the bank for? In a market starved of elite-level, Premier League-ready strikers, the answer leans towards yes. Zirkzee may offer technical flair and long-term upside, and Højlund is a project still in progress. But Watkins delivers now. His experience, adaptability, and finishing consistency could be the difference between another underwhelming campaign and a genuine push for relevance.
More Manchester United News:
Manchester United have spent lavishly in recent years, often for promise rather than proof. This time, they may need to reverse that trend. Watkins doesn’t just tick boxes, he answers questions that have lingered too long at Old Trafford.
Persisting with Højlund and Zirkzee is also an option, but it involves taking similar risks as last season. Watkins, by experience and present, offers a certainty that is currently in short supply on United’s attacking front. Meanwhile, Manchester United star Marcus Rashford continues to harbour a Barcelona dream.