Manchester United might be open to loaning Rasmus Hojlund rather than selling him permanently
This summer was expected to bring a major overhaul of Manchester United’s squad. After suffering their worst-ever Premier League campaign, no player seemed untouchable. However, the reality paints a different picture. The board has yet to make any decisive moves, fuelling doubts about their direction.
Among the many names, the case of Rasmus Højlund stands out as the clearest example of this limbo. Last season made it clear that his performance was inconsistent and he never scored as often as expected. The team, already lacking ideas in attack, ran out of steam just when it needed it most.
Now, Ben Jacobs has explained in The United Stand that the idea of a permanent transfer is not on the table. The interest from Italian clubs do not compensate for such a high risk. If United sell Højlund now, they will take an accounting loss that would further damage their image. A loan, on the other hand, appears to be a solution with less financial impact. The preferred formula would be a loan with an option to buy, because it allows the final figure to be inflated. Thus, if Højlund explodes in another environment, the club recover part of their investment.
Is a loan with a high option to buy for Hojlund a smart strategy for Manchester United to maintain squad depth while planning for a new number nine?
“I think it’s unlikely that United go for a permanent exit right away, with interest from Italy, because then they make a book loss. It’s possible there is a loan with an option, it’s less likely to be a loan with an obligation because the overall package won’t reflect well on Manchester United’s books. The advantage of an option is that it can be set extremely high, so that’s the advantage. United have a clear idea now that Hojlund is more likely to depart than stay and they’re looking at a number nine.”
Opinion:
However, keeping that door open sends a confusing message. What does it say about Old Trafford’s ambition? If, after months of promising a squad overhaul, the club are hesitating even with a striker who has not delivered, it is logical to question the lack of decision-making. Fans are still waiting for the arrival of a new number nine, someone capable of reigniting an attack that has fizzled out game after game.
More Manchester United News:
Meanwhile, the Dane is living with rumours that he is leaving England, but nothing has been confirmed. A loan would allow United to retain some control and avoid further losses. However, there is a risk of keeping a player on the squad who lacks confidence and has no clear role. Is this sustainable? It is difficult to know when the squad needs fresh air and, above all, goals. Every day that passes without a major sale reduces the room for manoeuvre. The club need funds to complete key signings and strengthen sensitive positions.
In the end, the question is simple: is it worth protecting the books at the expense of sporting performance? Many believe that a lack of determination could cost them another lacklustre season. A sense of paralysis is growing among the fans. The 22-year-old’s name sums up the contradiction of a project that seems to have stalled. If United do not resolve this situation soon, they could once again pay dearly for their indecision.