Phil Jones has weighed in on Manchester United’s turbulent start under Ruben Amorim, urging patience and praising the manager’s honesty. The former defender admitted results have been poor but insists the Portuguese coach should not abandon his principles despite mounting pressure at Old Trafford.
Phil Jones urges time for Amorim
Speaking to Ladbrokes, Jones said he admires Amorim’s authenticity. “I like his honesty; he is who he is, and he’ll face criticism for it, but he’s not going to change for anyone. He owns it,” Jones remarked. He stressed that Amorim arrived mid-season with a squad not built for his system, and warned against quick judgments. “Let’s give him time and see where we’re at come March.”
Jones urged calm again, reminding fans and players not everyone will like the manager—and that’s normal. He emphasized professionalism over finger-pointing: “Pull yourself out of your a**… nine times out of ten, that’s what the problem is.”*
Phil also reflected on the Carabao Cup defeat to League to Grimsby, describing it as painful but not decisive. He reminded fans Amorim had warned results could dip before improving, insisting patience remains vital if United are to rebuild.
Pressure builds after poor start
Amorim’s rigid back-five system has drawn sharp criticism, with analysts pointing to predictable attacks and wasted opportunities. A tactical breakdown showed Man United often create high-value chances only in the dying minutes, exposing a lack of flexibility.
Amorim admitted to moments of deep frustration, even confessing he sometimes “hates” his players and feels like quitting. Yet he doubled down on his approach, saying change would only come once the squad fully adapts. Pundits such as Martin Keown have questioned his ability to connect with players, while Simon Jordan argued United cannot afford further decline.
Author’s view
Jones’ defence of Amorim highlights a key truth: United need stability, not another reset. Amorim’s blunt honesty may sting, but it shows accountability. If the club grants him time to implement his ideas, his refusal to compromise could eventually prove a strength rather than a flaw.