The charges relate to alleged breaches of the FA’s rules governing agents.
Chelsea have been charged by the Football Association in relation to information their new owners reported to the authorities after completing their 2022 takeover (John Walton/PA)open image in gallery
Chelsea have been charged by the Football Association in relation to information their new owners reported to the authorities after completing their 2022 takeover (John Walton/PA) (PA Wire)
Your support helps us to tell the story
Support Now
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.
Chelsea have been hit with 74 Football Association charges after their current owners self-reported financial issues to the football authorities they uncovered when buying the club from Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich.
The charges relate to alleged breaches of the FA’s rules governing agents, and are understood to centre on alleged irregular payments made as part of deals which brought Eden Hazard, Samuel Eto’o and Willian, among others, to Chelsea during the Russian’s tenure. There is no suggestion of any wrongdoing on the part of those players.
Chelsea could face a sporting sanction, such as a transfer ban or a points deduction, if some or all of the charges are found proven, but the club’s role in proactively bringing the matter to light may mean an independent commission hearing the case would determine a fine is an appropriate penalty.
UEFA agreed a resolution with Chelsea to pay 10 million euros (£8.6m) in July 2023 after the club’s new owners proactively shared information with European football’s governing body which they obtained as part of their due diligence during the 2022 takeover.
Chelsea’s owners also shared the information they had found with the FA and the Premier League at the same time, with the latter understood to be still investigating the matter separately to the FA probe.
Independent accounting analysts are understood to have told Chelsea that even if the alleged irregular payments had been reported correctly at the appropriate times, the club would have always remained compliant with the Premier League’s profitability and sustainability rules (PSR).
The club said in a statement issued on Thursday they were “pleased to confirm that its engagement with the FA concerning matters that were self-reported by the club is now reaching a conclusion”.
The statement added: “The club has demonstrated unprecedented transparency during this process, including by giving comprehensive access to the club’s files and historical data.
“We will continue working collaboratively with the FA to conclude this matter as swiftly as possible. We wish to place on record our gratitude to the FA for their engagement with the club on this complex case, the focus of which has been on matters that took place over a decade ago.”
Abramovich was forced to cede ownership of Chelsea in 2022 after he was sanctioned by the British Government following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. A spokesperson for Abramovich has been contacted for comment.
The FA has given Chelsea until September 19 to respond to the charges, which span a period between 2009 and 2022 but primarily relate to events which occurred between the 2010-11 to 2015-16 playing seasons.
Among the FA regulations the club are alleged to have breached are J1 and C2 of the Football Agent Regulations.
J1 concerns the use of unauthorised agents, while C2 states: “A club, player or authorised agent must not so arrange matters as to conceal or misrepresent the reality and/or substance of any matters in relation to a transaction or contract negotiation.”