Chancellor Rachel Reeves will unveil the policy when she delivers her November 26 Budget, it has been reported.
Announcing a per mile charge for electric vehicles (EVs) in the Budget could be viewed as a ‘poll tax on wheels’, a motoring group has warned (John Walton/PA)
Announcing a per mile charge for electric vehicles (EVs) in the Budget could be viewed as a ‘poll tax on wheels’, a motoring group has warned (John Walton/PA) (PA Archive)
Your support helps us to tell the story
Support Now
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.
Announcing a per mile charge for electric vehicles (EVs) in the Budget could be viewed as a “poll tax on wheels”, a motoring group has warned.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves will unveil a policy to introduce a 3p per mile fee for EVs when she delivers her November 26 Budget, the Daily Telegraph reported.
The scheme is set to be implemented in 2028 following a consultation, and would cost average EV drivers £250 per year, according to the newspaper.
The Treasury is suffering from a reduction in revenue from fuel duty, as more drivers switch from petrol or diesel cars to EVs.
Successive governments have found the prospect of introducing per-mile charges for driving – sometimes referred to as road pricing – to be too politically toxic.
AA president Edmund King said: “Whilst we acknowledge the Treasury is losing fuel duty revenue as drivers go electric, the Government has to tread carefully unless their actions slow down the transition to EVs.
“The Zev mandate for 28% of new car sales to be zero emissions this year will not be met as sales are running at just 22%.
“We need to see the detail of this proposal to ascertain whether these new taxes will be equitable or a poll tax on wheels.”
The so-called poll tax – introduced by Margaret Thatcher’s government in Scotland in 1989 and then England and Wales the following year – was a fixed payment for all adults, which sparked violent protests.
The Daily Telegraph said Ms Reeves’ EV scheme will involve users estimating how far they will drive over the following 12 months, and making an extra payment on top of vehicle excise duty (VED).
If they drive more they will need to top up this amount, while some of the money would carry over to the next year if someone clocks up fewer miles.
Journey examples of a 3p per mile fee include £12 between London and Edinburgh, £5 between Cambridge and Bristol, and £2 between Liverpool and Leeds.
EVs’ exemption from VED was removed in April.
Ginny Buckley, chief executive of EV advice site Electrifying.com, said: “This is yet another example of mixed messaging from the Government.
“Drivers are being encouraged to go electric, then hit with the threat of new taxes – you can’t drive the EV transition with one foot on the accelerator and the other on the brake.
“This adds extra cost for EV drivers who can’t charge at home and already pay more per mile on public chargers than many petrol drivers.
“It also penalises those who switched in good faith, based on promised savings.”
She added that if the Government introduces this it should also unfreeze fuel duty, which has not risen with inflation for more than 14 years.
Tanya Sinclair, chief executive of lobby group Electric Vehicles UK, said there is “no doubt” the system of paying for vehicle usage “needs fundamental reform”, but stressed the importance of how this happens.
She added: “Government must take the time to consult properly, design carefully and communicate transparently – a process that will take years, not months.”
The Treasury was approached for a comment.