The loss of the Carabao semi-final to Arsenal by Chelsea could not help but focus on Robert Sanchez but the reaction of Liam Rosenior was of much more importance than the mistakes. In his act of taking blame publicly, the new head coach showed his approach in restoring confidence, responsibility, and tactics within a team that is yet to deal with years of uncertainty.
These are some of the mistakes that are not to be overlooked at the elite level made by Sanchez. He did not take over the corner of Declan Rice and therefore Ben White was able to score in the early stages, and a handling error following the half-time provided Viktor Gyokeres with a simple goal. Mistakes in goalkeeping are lethal, but the separation of the mistakes kills the tactical change that Rosenior is enforcing.
Rosenior has been vocal that Robert Sanchez is being requested to do a job that is not familiar to him. Modern goalkeepers start build-up, have higher starting positions and can take risks under the pressure. Making changes within just a few days of training ground will always result in errors prior to the arrival of improvement.
Why short-term judgement has damaged Chelsea before
Understandably, the fans of Chelsea want instant gratification, but the continual short-term evaluation has hurt the club in the past. Liam Rosenior is trying to transform behaviour without having to compromise on competitiveness. That needs players who think they cannot make errors and automatically lose trust, be fired, or popular support of their manager.
This is especially with respect to a goalkeeper. Performance is characterized by confidence, and fear implies hesitation. Rosenior will take the pressure off of Robert Sanchez by taking responsibility as he will increase the responsibility of the group. It is a management decision that aims at stabilising performance as opposed to burning anxiety.
It also has a functional component. Chelsea do not have an apparent substitute that can immediately replace Sanchez. Sacking him following a single game would bring confusion as opposed to a sense of power. Rosenior is cognizant of the fact that continuity is usually more important than symbolic punishment, as tactical transition.
Why context still matters after the defeat
The fact itself of the match corroborated the logic. Nevertheless, Sanchez made an excellent save during the second half of the game, which saved the lives of Chelsea despite the mistakes. The objectives of Garnacho made the tie competitive. Chelsea did not fail structurally; they lost their control at times and it can be rectified.
Injuries also make judgement difficult. Cole Palmer, Reece James, Malo Gusto and Moises Caicedo were out and this weakened the defense at the goal line. It is unrealistic to expect the smooth operation against one of the strongest pushing sides in Europe with such conditions.
Why Rosenior’s defence is not blind loyalty
It is not that Rosenior does not know that criticism will revert should Robert Sanchez not improve. His defence is not being immunized but rather a conditional support in the process of adaptation. There is still accountability, but the accountability commences with the manager taking the accountability first and then refinement comes second.
Why Chelsea’s deeper problem is cultural, not individual
The more serious issue in Chelsea is culture instability. Trust has been destroyed by cycles of blame on the part of the public, the repeated reset button and making decisions based on fear. The approach presented by Senior implies a transition to a more moderate style of leadership, in which errors are penalised within the organisation and education is more important than indignation.
The success of this philosophy will be determined by the outcomes after some time when the principles have been adhered to. Repeated mistakes will not be taken permanently by the fans. Rosenior has made a decision not to panic, although he is aware that he will be criticized.
Why this decision could define Rosenior’s reign
To Chelsea such a decision might be the last stage towards development. It was not denial to defend Sanchez, but direction. Rosenior was indicating that the reconstruction must be undertaken with patience, bravery, and responsibility on top. This calculated gamble will only tell after some time whether it brings stability.
In the future, perception will be determined in the short-term upon the second leg and the future league matches. Rhetoric has to be followed by improvement in decision-making, communication and defensive coordination. This will be remembered as defense, and not defense, unless Sanchez develops in the system of Rosenior. Otherwise, accountability will become more acute.
Why leadership mattered more than results in this moment
At this point, it required leadership and Rosenior provided it. That tactic is the exact opposite of past regimes where the masses caused disillusionment in the form of spilt confidence and rapid downfall. Rebuilding of Chelsea cannot withstand a perpetual state of apprehension.
Toleration of imperfection is needed to continue the progress and this would be particularly true in terms of the new systems, when there is a rush, scrutiny and the inordinate time-scheduling during the contest. The message that Rosenior sends to the players is very straightforward: learn quickly, have faith in the process, and be accountable together.
Chelsea either win a trophy before the end of the season, or lose, but this game will set the future colour of his reign and tell us whether the process of cultural repair is in earnest. Conventionally, it is a risk, but leadership without conviction can accomplish nothing. Rosenior has decided to lead, take blame and establish standards.
The answer to that gamble will depend on the reaction of Chelsea which will be either a move forward or a new false dawn. Those responses will come swiftly in outcomes, responses and strength displayed on decisive weeks in the future. The current response of Chelsea can potentially define future seasons.
More on CHELSEA:
Follow Six Sports on