The loss of Chelsea to Arsenal in the semi-final of the Carabao Cup, in the first leg should not be condensed to the simplistic account of the mistakes made by Robert Sanchez. Though the errors of the goalkeeper were clear and expensive, the larger problem is the interim of the position that the club of Chelsea is going through under Liam Rosenior. This was not just a night of personal failure, but a photograph of a team literally being recast on the fly, as it straddled between short-term performance and identity over the long term.
The case by Liam Rosenior was no case of unblinding loyalty towards Sanchez. It was a management expression of purpose. In assuming responsibility of the risks they are subjecting his goalkeeper to, Rosenior created the impression that Chelsea attempt to change the way they are forming in the back. Sanchez is also being requested to play higher, deliver faster, and play under pressure in a manner that was not a major aspect of his previous job. Mistakes, though hurtful, are virtually an inseparable side effect of this kind of change.
Why Context Matters More Than Blame
The issue of Chelsea is that evolution does not occur in a vacuum. Cole Palmer, Reece James, Malo Gusto and Moises Caicedo were missing leaving the side with a lack of structure, control and leadership. In such a setting, Sanchez was exposed more than it should have been. Arsenal has one of the most aggressive presses in Europe, which necessitates a quick decision-making process and the situations that Chelsea found itself in forced them to be out of such traps quickly.
What this match highlighted is that, Chelsea are a team that has not yet learnt how to learn to suffer together. In case of errors, the separation between players was too big, the response was also too slow. The error of a goalkeeper is terminal when the defensive unit around him is not in line. It is not a justification of Sanchez, but it is an explanation that will be important to know whether Chelsea are on its way.
Why Liam Rosenior Approach Breaks Chelsea’s Old Cycle
This attitude of Liam Rosenior is the total opposite of the reactive culture that Chelsea have dwelt in over the past seasons. Chelsea swapped, criticised, and sacked goalkeepers at an alarming rate. Sanchez, as Kepa Arrizabalaga before him, has been working under the aura of a single error making weeks of debate. The demand of the top by Liam Rosenier to be accountable is an intent to disrupt that cycle.
Behind the confusion were some positives. Chelsea fought fearfully, drove with purpose and demonstrated resilience with a late run of Alejandro Garnacho. That is not many opposing sides that generate that kind of attacking threat on Arsenal without Palmer, James or Cacedo. That in itself indicates that the foundations are not as weak as the scoreline made it sound.
Why Courage Without Control Becomes Costly
But uncontrolled courage is a dangerous thing. The team of Chelsea is youthful, talented and athletic though they are yet to master game management. The fact that Chelsea failed to slow the match when needed amplified the errors of Sanchez. The lack of a soothing influence in the middlefield beckoned a number of times to pressure on the backline.
The question of whether Chelsea can withstand these growing pains will define the club in the long run. Rosenior openly pleads for patience, something rarely seen at Chelsea. Sanchez needs support both tactically and psychologically if he wants to thrive. Constant scrutiny will not improve decision-making; only structured repetition and trust can do so over time, together on the pitch and beyond, consistently and deliberately now.
Why Palmer’s Return Could Change the Entire Picture
The coming back of Cole Palmer will alter the picture. His skill to hold onto the ball in higher positions on the field limits the defensive exposure and gives the ability to control the pace of the game to Chelsea. Sanchez will face fewer high-risk conditions as Palmer stays in good health, and he can demonstrate his distribution strengths more clearly on the pitch.
Chelsea should see this defeat as necessary pain along the way, not as the end of the journey they are still shaping. Chelsea are not the finished product that Liam Rosenior sees them becoming but they are no longer aimlessly floating along. The real difficulty comes from resisting the temptation to scapegoat individuals, even while the club continues building the project step by step.
Why the Second Leg Is About Mentality, Not Margin
If Chelsea responds with rational intent instead of panic, Sanchez’s errors can eventually form constituent parts of a painful yet fruitful change, shaping growth through experience rather than fear. Otherwise, the blame game will revisit itself and the process of improvement will stagnate once again.
The second leg played by Chelsea will tell a lot more on mentality than margin. Are they sheltering round and hiding, or do they stand their ground? That answer is the credibility of Rosenior. It is not comfortable to base anything on process rather than panic, particularly in the wake of defeat, but it is how sustainable success is possible. Chelsea have chased short-term solutions over the years, and everyone can see the outcome. By choosing to endure short-term pain, the club can eventually accept that it must pursue coherence, and that players must treat individual mistakes as lessons rather than as repeated wounds, learned together in public moments of pressure. The alternative remains well known, loud, and once again, fruitless anyway.
More on CHELSEA:
Follow Six Sports on