Chelsea decision to recall Aaron Anselmino of Borussia Dortmund might seem definitive, however, there is a danger that this will also put the club between the two: ambition in the short-term and long-term planning. As the time of the January deadline draws near the question of what is the realistic role of Anselmino in the squad of Liam Rosenior, rather than his indecisive nature, must be clarified carefully and transparently for the club’s long-term success.
Chelsea have been in the hunt to finish in the top four, are balancing between competing in the domestic and Champions League, and are still working under a manager who has yet to establish his authority. It is not a developing environment. Each choice made in the process of selections is amplified, and each error in defending is punishable. That being the case, the recall by Anselmino cannot be conflated with trust. It is, best, an audition done in mean conditions urgently under pressure and tested rigorously.
Defensive Fragility and Timing Concerns
The situation with the centre-back of Chelsea is weak. The hamstring injury that Tosin suffered has taken away a physical presence, Benoit Badiashile is still trying patience because his concentration still lapses, and Trevoh Chalobah is consistently unreliable. The availability of Wesley Fofana has been a good move yet Chelsea can not risk leaving him without a proper cover. That fact is the cause of the recall, but it is not a reason to be sentimental.
Anselmino loan experience to Dortmund has not put a positive pressure on the hand of Chelsea. To have made 10 appearances in competitions interrupted by an injury, is not the profile of a defender who is ready to enter into a run-in in a high pressure Premier League. This does not mean that his potential should be criticized but it is an acknowledgment of timing. Potential fails to protect set-pieces, control game rhythm, and sooth a stadium during a momentum swing effectively in key moments when the stakes are highest.
Rosenior’s Approach and the Need for Ruthlessness
The initial years that Rosenior has led Chelsea have built on trust and involvement. He has reduced roles, enhanced group aggression and required responsibility. Putting a player in whom he cannot place full trust compromises the foundation. Rosenior managers do not take chances very often and they should not. January is not an opportunity to take risks unnecessarily.
Here, Chelsea will have to be ruthless. Not to evaluate Anselmino hastily, honestly, and without regard to optics. In case the coaching staff feel that he is able to deliver capable low error cover, then retain him and invest in him. That is in terms of minutes, accountability, and immunity against being scapegoated following a single bad performance. In case such a belief is not there, then making the issue a force is not useful to anyone or distracting the squad.
Centre-back Aaron Anselmino is leaving Borussia Dortmund and will return to Chelsea FC with immediate effect.
Thank you, Aaron, for your time at BVB and all the best for your future! ✊ pic.twitter.com/gf2TQ5GYmW
— Borussia Dortmund (@BlackYellow) January 26, 2026
Learning from Past Mistakes and Prioritizing Stability
Without reasons to support it, other than the fact that alternatives are costly or complex, would be a classic Chelsea error to keep Anselmino. This is already seen in the case of Axel Disasi, where he amassed defenders with no clear pecking order. Rosenior requires players he can trust, especially in crucial games against Napoli, national rivals, and teams exploiting Chelsea’s defensive insecurity consistently and decisively to maintain strong performance.
The case of Jeremy Jacquet serves to support the argument. It would make sense that Chelsea withdraws a January transfer and aims to do it in summer instead. It acknowledges that it should not be panic and defensive recruitment. The same argument applied within should conclude that Chelsea should develop Annalmino elsewhere in case he is not really prepared fully for top-flight action before taking major risks.
The issue a wider problem of Chelsea is that it is not about talent recognition, it is about timing. Young defenders require stability, time and forgiveness. The present environment of Chelsea does not have any of those luxuries. It is not fair to Anselmino to expect him to fill that gap and it is a big risk on the part of the team if mismanaged carefully under pressure.
Decision Time: Safety Over Sentiment
Rosenior came in to stabilize Chelsea and not to play the story game. The club must support this requirement. The staff must believe Aaron Anselmino is functional at present, or he must leave the field soon, and they must decide his future. The worst solution is indecision completely.
In January, ambition requires enlightenment. Defensive maybes are beyond the budget of Chelsea. They have to decide to be safe rather than sorry even though hope has the colours of the club and inspires the squad throughout the season.
This will be one of the indications of whether or not Chelsea have learned anything in the past few seasons. Effective clubs do not need to lump squad building with matchday need and they do not need to be emotional about it. So, judging Liam Rosenior on results, he should not be provided with projects, but with tools. This decision will not mark the end of the career of Anselmino, but maturity may mark the end of the career of Chelsea. Making a strong move today saves the player, the manager and the season itself. Anything different is like putting on the wrong shoes and adding another chapter of instability Chelsea can no longer afford without serious consequences.
More on CHELSEA:
Follow Six Sports on