While Chelsea’s League Cup semi-final defeat will have stung in the Chelsea dressing room, it will have barely registered at BlueCo HQ, who are more preoccupied with revenue than glory on the pitch.
The League Cup is not a money-spinner. In fact, after paying out relevant performance bonuses to players and giving away half of the gate receipts at Stamford Bridge, Chelsea have probably made a loss all in all.
Had Liam Rosenior’s tactical vision for the Arsenal game borne fruit and the Blues had gone on to win the final at Wembley, the club would have banked just £100,000 in prize money, about a third of what a superstar like Enzo Fernandez earns every week after bonuses and image rights.
Contrast that to the Premier League, where each place in the table is worth about £3m in prize money, plus an extra £1m facility fee for every game televised domestically.
Simon Jordan met Behdad Eghbali and says he’s one of the smartest and capable people he’s ever met in football 👀
Thoughts?
Simon Jordan on Behdad Eghbali
Photo by Crystal Pix/MB Media/Getty Images
Or the Champions League, where years of lobbying from the so-called Big Six and their elite peers in the continent have led to an ultra-lucrative competition format and financial distribution system which favours the European game’s aristocracy.
Premier League clubs dominated the Champions League league phase this season, with Chelsea among five clubs to finish in the top eight automatic qualification spots.
And now, as details of how much Chelsea have earned from the 16 points they picked up in Europe emerge, a leading football finance expert has told the Chelsea Chronicle of an interesting knock-on effect.
Chelsea wage structure scrutinised after Champions League windfall
About a year ago, Chelsea briefed the press that they had managed to bring their average weekly player wage down to around £60,000.
In football finance circles, there was a lot of scepticism about that claim. Chelsea’s total wage bill in 2024-25, per figures in the Deloitte Football Money League, was about £365m. Even adjusting for the circa 25 per cent of the payroll that is allocated to non-first team employees, the numbers just don’t add up.
Granted, BlueCo have stressed that they have implemented a performance-orientated wage structure, where success on the pitch is rewarded through bonuses. But that is not a new development in football, and Chelsea are certainly not the first to move to an incentivised model.
A general view of the match shirt of Jamie Gittens in the Chelsea dressing room prior to the Premier League match between Chelsea and West Ham United at Stamford Bridge on January 31, 2026 in London, England.
Photo by Chris Lee – Chelsea FC/Chelsea FC via Getty Images
“All clubs have highly incentivised pay structures,” University of Liverpool football finance lecturer Kieran Maguire says in exclusive conversation with The Chelsea Chronicle.
“Contracts at the elite end of the Premier League include huge bonuses. Okay, maybe Chelsea have pushed further in this direction on average, but that £60,000 figure isn’t credible.”
The nature of heavily incentivised contracts also means that when the club reaches a certain landmark, such as qualifying for the Champions League knockout rounds, costs significantly increase and subsume a large chunk of the extra revenue generated.
Analysis from football finance expert Swiss Ramble suggests Chelsea have earned in the region of £80m after finishing 6th in the Champions League phase, but player bonuses, administrative costs and other factors will eat into profits on a net basis.
Again, Chelsea are not a unique case here. It’s the same at every club. However, with the Blues operating under a settlement agreement with UEFA that limits their football spending and generating operating losses in excess of £200m since the BlueCo takeover, the issue of player remuneration – the club’s highest expense – has never been more significant.
BlueCo have lost over £1bn since Chelsea takeover
Is this sustainable? What's Clearlake's masterplan to claw back these losses?
And Maguire believes that the bonus-geared contract model could also “cause ruptures in the dressing room.
“There are some virtually guaranteed starters – like Cucurella, Caicedo, Fernandez – and those are the players who are likely to be on these very high top-ups. If for some reason they stop getting picked, they aren’t going to be happy because they miss out on so much money.
“So I can see the cash benefits of this model to Chelsea, although I think they have overplayed them to the media. But there are clearly favourites at the club in terms of the players selected most weeks, and they probably have some form of financial muscle in conversation with management.”
Join Our Newsletter
Receive a digest of our best Chelsea content each week direct to your mailbox