Los Angeles Lakers LeBron James Luka Doncic Austin Reaves Jason Timpf
Getty
Luka Dončić and Austin Reaves combined for 60 points in the Lakers’ win over the Knicks, but the real debate afterward centered on LeBron James’ role. Jason Timpf explains why the Lakers still need LeBron, but may need to adjust how they use him.
After the Los Angeles Lakers’ dynamic duo of Luka Doncic and Austin Reaves combined for 60 points in a 110-97 win over the New York Knicks on Sunday, a familiar debate resurfaced around the league: are the Lakers actually better without LeBron James?
James missed the game with a left elbow contusion and arthritis in his left foot. That absence left Doncic and Reaves to carry the offense. Doncic finished with 32 points, eight rebounds, and four assists. He knocked down four three-pointers and scored 28 points in the first three quarters. Reaves added another strong scoring night as the Lakers secured their 39th win of the season.
The performance fueled online discussion about the Lakers’ offensive identity. However, NBA analyst Jason Timpf believes the real takeaway is different. Speaking on his podcast Hoops Tonight, Timpf argued the Lakers are not better without James. Instead, he believes the team may need to redefine his offensive role to maximize the lineup built around Doncic and Reaves.
Timpf addressed the viral discourse directly. He pushed back against the idea that Los Angeles functions better without its longtime superstar.
“No the Lakers are not better without LeBron, but I do think Austin needs to be the second option on this Lakers team,” Timpf said.
Lakers Need LeBron, But the Offense Should Change
The Knicks game offered a clear example of how dangerous the Lakers can look when Doncic runs the offense and Reaves serves as the primary scoring partner. Reaves’ performance stood out after several inconsistent outings earlier in the season.
But this conversation extends beyond one game. The statistical evidence supporting the Doncic-Reaves partnership has become difficult to ignore this season, even in a small sample size.
When the two share the floor without James, the Lakers hold a 9-2 record. In the 329 minutes Doncic and Reaves have played together, Los Angeles owns a +16.9 net rating. That mark ranks among the team’s most effective lineup combinations.
By comparison:
LeBron + Reaves: -4.7 net rating (194 minutes)
LeBron + Doncic: -3.5 net rating (498 minutes)
All three together: +1.5 net rating (293 minutes)
The numbers do not suggest James is the problem. Instead, they highlight how productive the Doncic–Reaves pairing can be when the offense runs through them.
Timpf made it clear that claims the Lakers are better without James are “ridiculous.” However, he noted the team could benefit if James accepts a different role now that Reaves has re-emerged as a consistent offensive weapon.
“But now that Austin’s back, I do think LeBron’s role offensively should be pared back,” he explained. “LeBron should be functioning as a screener unless he gets a favorable post matchup. I think that is the best version of this team.”
That would represent a unique role for the league’s all-time leading scorer. James has spent most of his career running offenses as the primary initiator. Now, the veteran may face a different reality. At this stage of his career, he may need to adjust his game to fit around other stars rather than the opposite.
Los Angeles Still Need LeBron to Contend
Despite the recent debate, the Lakers’ broader outlook still revolves around James. The team currently ranks ninth in offensive rating. That number has steadily improved over the past week.
If Los Angeles hopes to contend in the Western Conference playoffs, the offense likely needs to climb into the top five.
James remains one of the league’s most impactful players in his 21st season. However, the roster’s evolving identity centers on Doncic’s pace and Reaves’ scoring versatility. Because of that shift, the Lakers may benefit from adjusting how the four-time MVP is used.
That is the balance Timpf believes the Lakers must find. The team is not better without LeBron James. But if Los Angeles wants to maximize its new core, the path forward may involve reshaping James’ offensive role rather than replacing it.