Everton fans are furious once again after Chelsea somehow managed to avoid a points deduction for yet another breach of the financial rules.
Recently, it was revealed that Chelsea suffered a £355m loss for the 2024/25 campaign – the largest deficit ever recorded by an English club – but the Premier League decided against taking points off the west Londoners, despite doing exactly that to Everton in the 2023/24 season not once but twice.
Those at Stamford Bridge are now in hot water again after secret payments worth over £47m were revealed, but shockingly, only a £10.75m fine and a suspended transfer ban have been issued as punishments.
Adam Williams has now told Everton News why the Premier League refuse to take any points away from Chelsea – despite having no issues whatsoever in deducting points from Everton.
How would you rate The Friedkin Group’s first year at Everton? 👏
Angus Kinnear quote on Everton owners The Friedkin Group.
Credit: Getty Images/Vivien Killilea.
Exclusive: “Baffling” verdict as Premier League suggest Chelsea gained no sporting advantage from secret payments
The Head of Football Finance and Governance Content for GRV Media said: “When one takes a step back, the disparity between the punishments Everton and Chelsea have received is very, very hard to justify, but there are two ways you can look at this. Number one is to look at the letter of the law, and number two is to look at whether the law itself is fit for purpose and reflects the shared interests of clubs and fans.
“By the letter of the law, Everton and the other clubs who breached PSR have all been treated in a fairly uniform manner. We can argue about whether PSR is, or was, fit for purpose but, by the letter of the law, it’s hard to reason that anyone has been treated unfairly. The exception here is the initial Leicester City PSR case, where they got off on a technicality – that was due to incompetence rather than corruption, and Everton’s breach was due to spending too much on players, not the stadium. That’s a misnomer.
“In my view, some form of spending control is absolutely essential for the Premier League. There needs to be a deterrent to stop clubs spending beyond their means. Yes, PSR bakes in the advantages of the biggest clubs – which is why it was not the right system – but without a form of spending control, the state-run clubs and some of the private equity ones would outspend the likes of Everton by orders of magnitude more than they currently do – think Saudi Pro League levels of spending. There’s no commercial reason for the Friedkins to spend at that level. No spending regulation whatsoever would lead to massive inflation and, ultimately, the total monopolisation of the English game by one or two clubs.
MORE EVERTON STORIES
“Returning to the disparities between Everton and Chelsea, the fact that there has been a change of ownership and the new owners have self-reported and co-operated fully with the Premier League during the investigation has clearly softened the blow. Under the Farhad Moshiri regime, Everton were by all accounts quite belligerent with the Premier League behind closed doors. From first-hand accounts, I know the Friedkins have put in a lot of effort to fix that relationship. When that’s your starting position, it’s unlikely to do you any favours with how the Premier League attempt to prosecute their decision in front of the independent commission.
“So those are the arguments as to why Everton, in my view, deserved what they got. However, that’s not to say that the outcome for Chelsea here is not laughably lenient. In terms of the actual legal argument being made, you should read the analysis from Stefan Borson or another expert in the legal field, not the ones from finance experts, accountants or pundits. But in terms of governance and what purpose the rules themselves actually serve, I think it’s wild that an overspend is punished more severely than full-blown subterfuge and deceit. The Roman Abramovich regime was completely morally bankrupt; they have knowingly cheated with off-the-book payments.
“Yes, that’s not BlueCo’s fault, but like with PSR, the Premier League has to create a deterrent. It is baffling to me that the Premier League seems to be suggesting that Chelsea didn’t get a sporting advantage and therefore there should be no sporting sanction, such as a points deduction. Does Chelsea signing Eden Hazard, one of the all-time Premier League greats, using off-the-book payments not amount to a sporting advantage? And in what world can that spend be deemed not to have secured a sporting advantage, but Everton breaking the bank for, say, James Rodriguez’s wages or Cenk Tosun’s transfer fee is?
Has the Hill Dickinson Stadium brought new problems for Everton fans? 😬
Season ticket prices are expected to rise for next season 💰
General view outside the stadium as fans gather prior to the Premier League match between Everton and Brighton & Hove Albion at Hill Dickinson Stadium.
Credit: Getty Images/Clive Mason
“Ultimately, Everton deserved their points deduction, but two things can be true at the same time. Chelsea should, on a common-sense reading and one which looks at the role that central Premier League governance must play, have got much more. Everton fans and the wider Premier League have every right to be angry about that.”
Join Our Newsletter
Receive a digest of our best Everton content each week direct to your mailbox