In our latest tactical piece with supercomputer Machine Football, we examine the data behind where the England striker could go - and one option will surprise you.
View 7 Images
Marcus Rashford made his thoughts clear after his sensational free-kick against arch-rivals Real Madrid helped secure Barcelona's La Liga title.
"I’m not a magician, but if I was, I would stay [at Barcelona]," Rashford said. "We will see. I came here to win. This is a wonderful team, they're going to win so much in the future; to be a part of that would be special."
Despite falling out of favour at Old Trafford, Rashford’s underlying numbers remain strong. In reality, though, circumstances outside of his control could dictate whether Barcelona take up the £26million purchase option in his loan deal.
The question surrounding the 28-year-old is less about talent and more about environment.
Using Machine Football's supercomputer analysis, we can identify the clubs that suit him best - and those that don't.
1. The 'dream' move: Barcelona
This is Rashford’s preferred move, and it’s easy to see why. For starters, his numbers - 14 goals and 14 assists in all competitions despite making just 16 league starts - are nothing to be sniffed at.
And while Rashford’s pressing has been criticised throughout his career, Barcelona’s domestic dominance offers mitigation.
Barca have averaged 68.7% possession (compared to United’s 51% in his last full campaign, 2023-24), allowing Rashford to focus on the direct, instinctive attributes that make him highly effective when on form.
So far this season, Rashford has averaged under 1.5 counter-pressing recoveries per 90 minutes, but Barca's system does not require him to spend prolonged periods chasing the ball.
Naturally, Rashford has also built familiarity with his new teammates. Despite receiving criticism for his performances when filling in for Raphinha on the left during two injuries this season, Rashford has by and large been a good fit for Barca and this is backed up by Machine Football’s cohesion data.
The model used here classifies Barcelona’s system as an 'Attacking Engine' - focused on applying constant pressure to opponents through high possession and chance creation.
Other examples of this system include PSG and Manchester City, and it marries up well with the kind of system Rashford thrived in at United during Ole Gunnar Solskjaer's two full seasons at the wheel.
(Image: Machine Football)
View 7 Images
As we see here with elite cohesion scores - a measure of players' compatibility and effectiveness when connecting - between Rashford and Lamine Yamal, Dani Olmo, Pedri and Frenkie de Jong, Rashford has thrived when linking up with Barcelona’s top-level creators.
Given Rashford’s fluctuating confidence over the last few years, a longer-term stay in a team where he feels comfortable makes a lot of sense.
Unfortunately for him, Rashford’s wages, Barcelona’s financial restrictions and the inherent risk of offering a 28-year-old a longer-term contract to help with amortisation mean the Blaugrana could opt for a younger player to rotate in their attack.
Author avatar
Author avatar
2. PSG - a familiar profile
PSG play a pretty comparable style to Barcelona and, with the future of Bradley Barcola uncertain, the European champions could be on the lookout for another option capable of playing across the forward line.
And Rashford already matches up nicely alongside one of the Parisians’ key attackers: Khvicha Kvaratskhelia.
Machine Football has them both down as Dynamic 7s: players who can finish moves but who are capable of dragging a team up the pitch with their ball-carrying and counter-attack threat, rather than dictating the play for others.
(Image: Machine Football)
View 7 Images
With flying full-backs and the purring midfield of Vitinha and Joao Neves, PSG’s forwards are free to terrorise defences.
While he would be another squad option in Paris, as he is in Barcelona, Machine Football actually ranks his finishing higher than Kvaratskhelia, suggesting he could continue to impact games from the bench.
The concern, though, remains around his pressing. PSG employed a man-to-man system against Liverpool and Bayern Munich this season, and it seems unlikely Rashford could be trusted to execute this.
Like Barcelona, Bayern play pedal-to-the-metal football in an ‘Attacking Engine’ model, and links with Anthony Gordon suggest the Bavarian outfit are looking for a direct, progressive left-sided attacker to compete with Luis Diaz.
Gordon is rated by the Machine Football model at around €87million (£75m), though, which - like Yan Diomande - could price Bayern out of a move.
Rashford has historically performed best in teams built around territorial dominance, sustained attacking pressure, and elite creative support.
How Rashford would fit in the Bayern system and the team's overall cohesion scores, accordin to Machine Football's data model(Image: Machine Football)
View 7 Images
Bayern’s squad provides exactly that. The structure around him would also suit his game naturally and Rashford scores highly for hypothetical chemistry with Michael Olise, Joshua Kimmich and Jamal Musiala, and already has a strong relationship with Harry Kane from England national team duties.
That would allow Rashford to focus on what he does best: attacking space aggressively, carrying the ball into dangerous areas, and finishing moves.
Gordon still fits slightly better overall, with broader creative contribution and more consistent off-ball intensity.
(Image: Machine Football)
View 7 Images
That matters because Bayern’s system still demands aggressive pressing and defensive engagement from its wide forwards.
But the gap between the two profiles is narrower than the transfer fees suggest.
Don’t shoot the messenger!
While it’s obviously never going to happen, from a stylistic perspective, Liverpool emerge as Rashford’s strongest fit according to the Machine Football model.
With Mohamed Salah departing, the Reds need guaranteed goals from wide areas, and Rashford remains one of the best pure finishers available.
Although Rashford and Salah naturally operate from opposite flanks, the gap is not quite as rigid as it first appears.
Rashford has featured on the right for Barcelona this season - including in last weekend's El Clasico win over Real Madrid - which at least offers Liverpool some flexibility as they look to redistribute the huge volume of goals and assists lost from their attack next campaign.
Both Salah and Rashford rank among the elite finishers in their respective positions. The challenge is that Salah contributes far more than finishing.
(Image: Machine Football)
View 7 Images
But the two are very different players. Even on the decline, Salah - as an Incisive 7 - acts as a creative fulcrum for his side, totting up six league assists this term.
With Liverpool already having lost the creativity of Trent Alexander-Arnold and with Andy Robertson on the way out, big changes are needed.
Machine Football’s data shows a decline from 90.74 to 30.82 in the team’s creativity compared to last season.
However, even in a theoretical structural fit, there would be a risk that Liverpool sign an elite finisher without consistently generating enough high-quality chances around him.
Arsenal have long craved depth on the left wing, and Rashford could certainly give the Gunners some much-needed end product from those areas, but he would be a poor fit for the creativity the London side need.
Despite dominating possession for long stretches, Arsenal have often lacked creativity in open play, drawing criticism for their increasing reliance on set-pieces.
Rashford would improve their verticality and goalscoring output, but not necessarily address the deeper creative issues that have made Arsenal’s attack feel predictable at times.
In a side already searching for more creative variety, adding another primarily direct runner risks reinforcing the imbalance rather than solving it.
Fielding Eberechi Eze in that position has paid dividends recently and it feels unlikely that Arsenal would splash out on high wages for another player who does not directly solve that issue.
Newcastle, too, may be on the lookout if Gordon moves on, but with the Magpies favouring a high-octane intense pressing style and recently having moved Joelinton to wide duties for added physicality, this also feels like an unlikely destination.
Aston Villa, meanwhile, are crying out for added goal threat, having scored just 50 league goals this season and being reliant on moments of individual quality to win games. They also need greater squad depth for Champions League football next season.
Rashford scored four goals and managed six assists in his half-season at Villa before his loan to Barcelona, but the Villans declined the opportunity to sign him for £40million.
While he can play the final ball from out wide, Villa have struggled to sustainably engineer these passages of play this season, with Machine Football rating their build-up at just 39.27 out of 100 - the fifth-lowest in the league.
Rashford wouldn’t solve this by himself and nor would it be the ideal system for him to thrive in.
While some supporters have moved on from Rashford, and the new-look attack is clicking in his absence, the academy graduate is still technically a United player.
And with former head coach Ruben Amorim and his formation straightjacket gone, Michael Carrick, who now looks set to become the next permanent boss, could even look to reintegrate him.
With a sale unlikely to be far off the fee agreed with Barcelona, this could actually represent the best-value outcome for United if Rashford is able to return on top form.
Carrick built his attack around Finn Azaz at Middlesbrough - another Dynamic 7 - who thrived in Boro’s Possession Builder system, driving centrally and exploiting overloads from sustained possession.
Azaz bagged 23 goal contributions in Carrick’s final season in the North-East, and Rashford - elite at ball carrying, dribbling and a shooting threat - could suit it even better.
Rashford's off-the-ball weaknesses exposed by Amorim’s transitional football are less of a concern in a system like this.
With better players around him - and if both player and club can set their differences aside - a United return could actually see Rashford back to his best.