independent.co.uk

Why were Chelsea denied a penalty after Joao Pedro appeal?

The Brazilian felt the contact from the Uzbekistan international was enough to warrant a spot kick, but VAR disagreed in a goalless first half at Wembley Stadium

Bookmark popover

( AP )

Your support helps us to tell the story

Read moreSupport Now

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

**Your support makes all the difference.**Read more

Chelsea were denied a penalty after Joao Pedro’s appeal following contact with Manchester City’s Abdukodir Khusanov towards the end of the FA Cup final.

After a break in play, as VAR checked the incident, the Blues were left frustrated, with play continuing in a goalless first half.

Joao Pedro was lively during the first half and stormed towards goal, only for Khusanov to step across his line just as the Chelsea forward stepped into the area. The Brazilian and Chelsea fans on social media were convinced the contact from the Uzbekistan international was enough to warrant a spot kick, but VAR and a number of pundits disagreed.

Chelsea v Man City LIVE: FA Cup final score and updates as Wembley clash goalless at half-time

“I'm not sure he can get out of the way of Joao Pedro, I don't think VAR will do anything with that, I think he stands firm, stands in his way, and I think that's really good defending,” Alan Shearer said on co-commentary duties on the BBC.

While Ally McCoist agreed, stating on TNT Sports: "I think it's excellent defending. He just comes across and stands his ground. I think it's excellent.”

With Steven Gerrard in agreement: "It's a shoulder charge, isn't it, I agree with you Ally. Brilliant in the duel this half, both him [Khusanov] and Marc Guehi.”

Numerous replies on social media from fans disagreed with VAR and pundits, with some labelling it an "obvious" and "blatant" penalty. Others claimed that the incident would likely warrant a foul if committed outside of the area.

The Blues were denied another appeal in the second half, with Enzo Fernandez’s cross blocked by Nico O’Reilly in a fiery contest as Pep Guardiola’s side target a famous domestic treble.

Read full news in source page