Why Chelsea’s £10million-£12.5million range may not make financial or football sense for Sunderland.
There has been plenty of debate around Granit Xhaka’s Sunderland book value and what Chelsea would need to pay to make a deal worthwhile for the Black Cats.
The honest answer is that it is impossible to be definitive without knowing the full structure of the deal that took Xhaka from Bayer Leverkusen to Wearside last summer. Transfer fees are rarely as simple as one fixed number. They can include guaranteed payments, achievable add-ons, harder-to-reach bonuses, instalments, agent costs and other variables.
The broad calculation, however, is fairly straightforward. Sunderland signed Xhaka in a total package worth around £17.5million on a three-year contract. For accounting purposes, that transfer cost is generally spread across the length of the player’s contract. In simple terms, that means Sunderland would theoretically amortise around £5.8million of the fee per year.
After one season, approximately £5.5million to £6million will have been written down in accounting terms, leaving Xhaka’s remaining book value at somewhere around £11.5million to £12million. That figure is only an estimate. We do not know the exact make-up of the initial fee, which add-ons are guaranteed, which are performance-related or how each element has been treated in Sunderland’s accounts. That is why any calculation should be viewed as an informed approximation rather than a hard number.
What it does show, though, is that a Chelsea bid of around £10million would almost certainly not represent a profit for Sunderland. In fact, it would likely fall below Xhaka’s remaining book value and could leave the club recording an accounting loss on the player.
A bid in the region of £12million to £12.5million would be closer to break-even territory, or slightly above it, depending on the exact structure of the deal. But there is an important distinction to make here: simply meeting Sunderland’s remaining book value does not represent a profit. It only means the club may avoid recording an accounting loss.
For Sunderland to actually turn an accounting profit, Chelsea would need to pay more than Xhaka’s remaining book value. Even then, a small profit on paper would not necessarily make the deal attractive. A fee slightly above book value would still fall well short of the overall £17.5million package Sunderland committed to last summer.
For the numbers to become more interesting from a pure accounting perspective, Chelsea would likely need to go well beyond the reported £10million to £12.5million range. Something closer to £15million would begin to look more attractive, while anything approaching or exceeding the original £17.5million package would allow Sunderland to recover most, if not all, of the total transfer commitment they made to sign him.
But even that does not tell the full story. Xhaka is not just another player on Sunderland’s balance sheet. He is the club captain, one of the most important figures in Régis Le Bris’ squad and a central part of Sunderland’s midfield. His experience, leadership and influence were major reasons why the club signed him in the first place.
That is why Sunderland’s stance has been so firm. They do not want to sell, and they do not want to entertain offers for a player they still view as hugely important. That is the key point. This is not just an accounting calculation. Selling Xhaka for a small accounting gain would make little sense unless the fee was simply too good to ignore.
Continue Reading