20 Jul 2026 20:00 BST | 4 min read
Morgan Rogers, Arsenal, 2026
Exclusive
© IMAGO
Steve Kay
Make us your Google favourite
Chelsea have beaten Arsenal to the signing of Aston Villa superstar Morgan Rogers.
On Saturday, news emerged that the Blues had verbally agreed an eye-watering €138 million deal for the England attacker, which will see him become the second-most expensive player in Premier League history behind only Alexander Isak.
Rogers underwent his Chelsea medical earlier on Monday after his return from the World Cup, where he finished third with the Three Lions following a remarkable 6-4 victory over France.
The 23-year-old is expected to sign a six-year contract with Chelsea, with the option for a further season. He will become the West London club's record signing and link up with his close friend Cole Palmer at Stamford Bridge.
Everything has happened very quickly, leaving supporters, particularly of the Arsenal persuasion, wondering how exactly Rogers went from being the Gunners' top target to joining Chelsea in the space of just a couple of days.
How Rogers ended up at Chelsea
Arsenal's pursuit of Rogers was well-documented. The Premier League champions viewed him as the perfect marquee player for the left wing, even if that is arguably not his best position.
On Friday, FootballTransfers revealed that personal terms had been agreed with Rogers and that Arsenal were readying their first bid. It was expected that this offer would clock in at around €123m (£105m), which would have been a club record for the Gunners.
Morgan Rogers
© IMAGO - Morgan Rogers
At the same time, however, we emphasised that there was still a sizeable gap in valuation and Villa were expected to knock this bid back. In the end, the offer never materialised because Chelsea beat Arsenal to the punch.
The Blues accelerated their pursuit of Rogers when they realised that Arsenal were ready to formalise their interest. They made sure to get in there before the Gunners could - and it worked.
Once Chelsea had put €138m (£117m) on the table, Arsenal left the discussions. They had no intention of entering a bidding war, and they certainly were not prepared to match that fee for Rogers. They wanted the player, but they were not willing to break the bank for him.
The suggestion that Arsenal were in any way shocked that Rogers ended up agreeing a move to Chelsea is an exaggeration. Yes, they were optimistic of signing him, but they were also well aware that there was high-profile interest from elsewhere and that his signing was not guaranteed.
Much like Man Utd did when Tottenham shelled out €98m on Mateus Fernandes, they accepted that they had been beaten to the punch and moved on to different targets. That's just how the market works: you win some, you lose some.
There are also no grievances with the player. Terms were agreed, but it means little as long as a deal is not formally signed. Rogers was ready for the next step in his career, but he did not have a clear preference heading into the summer.
He informed Villa of his desire for a change of scenery and left it to the club to negotiate the best deal. He would also have greenlit a move to Man Utd, Man City, Liverpool or a different club of that stature had they agreed a deal with Villa.
Chelsea did not hijack the signing of Rogers because there was no deal to hijack. It was not set in stone that Arsenal and Villa would be able to find common ground on a fee, and when the Blues made their hefty bid, the Gunners simply walked away.