Decision-making at Everton will make or break them over the coming years.
Modern football clubs are no longer built through recruitment alone. They are built through decision-making.
The transfer window is merely the public expression of that process. The most significant decisions are made long before a player signs a contract. They begin in meetings where recruitment, coaching, analytics, finance and long-term planning converge around a single question: what type of football club are we trying to build?
For Everton, that question has become increasingly relevant following the arrival of Angus Kinnear and the introduction of a new Football Leadership Team.
Rather than placingresponsibility in the hands of a traditional Director of Football, the club has adopted a collaborative leadership model, distributing responsibility across specialist areas of football operations instead of concentrating authority in a single executive.
The model is designed to create a decision-making process that is less dependent on individuals and better equipped to maintain strategic continuity through managerial change and the short-term pressures of modern football.
On paper, the structure is designed to reduce risk and improve continuity. In practice, organisational design alone does not guarantee success. The quality of any football structure is ultimately measured by the quality of the decisions it consistently produces.
That is where alignment becomes the defining challenge.
Recruitment can identify long-term talent. Analysts can provide evidence. Coaches can develop players. Executives can provide governance. But if every department is working towards a different objective, even the strongest organisational model will struggle to deliver sustainable success.
That is Everton's challenge. Not whether the club can identify talented players, but whether every department involved in football operations shares the same long-term vision for how the squad should evolve. In modern football, sustainable success is rarely determined by recruitment alone. It is determined by whether an entire organisation is pulling in the same direction.
To assess that challenge, we first need to understand how Everton's football operation is now organised.
For much of the Premier League era, clubs have relied on a relatively traditional hierarchy. A manager oversaw first-team performance while a Director of Football led recruitment, supported by scouting, analytics, sports science and medical departments. Success or failure often rested on the judgement of a small number of senior decision-makers.
Everton, however, have adopted a different approach.
Rather than replacing Kevin Thelwell with another Director of Football, the club has introduced a Football Leadership Team built around specialist expertise. Nick Cox serves as Technical Director, overseeing medical, operations, facilities, player care and academy functions. James Smith leads scouting and recruitment, Chris Howarth oversees football strategy and analytics, and Nick Hammond heads player trading. Together, the group operates under the executive oversight of Chief Executive Angus Kinnear.
The rationale behind this model is clear. Modern recruitment is no longer about identifying talented footballers in isolation. It requires balancing tactical suitability, financial sustainability, succession planning, squad age profiles, contract strategy, player development and long-term asset value. No single individual
possesses expertise across every discipline, making collaborative leadership an increasingly common approach across elite football.
In theory, this creates greater organisational resilience. Recruitment becomes less dependent on one influential figure, knowledge is shared across departments, and long-term planning becomes less vulnerable to changes in coaching staff or executive turnover.
Organisational design alone, however, does not create successful football clubs.
Its effectiveness depends on whether every department is working towards the same football philosophy. Collaboration only becomes a competitive advantage when recruitment, coaching and executive leadership are aligned on the type of squad they are trying to build.
Without that shared direction, even the most sophisticated organisational structure can produce conflicting priorities instead of coherent long-term planning.
Alignment has become one of the most frequently used terms in modern football, yet it is often misunderstood. It does not require unanimous agreement on every transfer target or tactical decision. Healthy debate is an essential feature of any high-performing organisation. Instead, alignment means every department is working towards the same strategic objective, even if their perspectives differ.
For the recruitment department, the objective is to build a squad capable of sustaining success over multiple seasons. Coaches naturally focus on preparing the team to win the next match.
Analysts evaluate performance through evidence and probability, while player trading weighs financial value, contract cycles and future market opportunities. Academy staff concentrate on developing the club's next generation. Each department views the game through a different lens, but all should ultimately contribute to the same football strategy.
This is where alignment becomes essential.
If recruitment prioritises young players with long-term development potential while coaching staff favour experienced, low-risk options to deliver immediate results, the club risks pursuing two different strategies simultaneously. Neither
approach is inherently wrong, but unless those priorities are reconciled within a shared vision, recruitment decisions can become reactive rather than strategic.
The most successful clubs establish principles that extend beyond individual managers or transfer windows. Recruitment profiles, succession planning, squad age, wage structure and player development become expressions of a clearly defined football identity rather than responses to short-term circumstances.
Alignment is not about agreeing on every player. It is about agreeing on what the club is trying to become. Once that foundation is established, every recruitment decision can be measured against it.
The greatest test of any football structure is not how it is designed, but how it performs when competing priorities emerge.
Managers, recruitment departments and executives operate under different forms of pressure. A head coach is judged by results, league position and performances. Recruitment teams are judged by the quality of the squad they assemble over multiple transfer windows.
Club leadership must balance football ambitions with financial sustainability, governance and long-term planning.
Those differing responsibilities inevitably create different time horizons.
A manager preparing for the next Premier League fixture will naturally prioritise reliability, experience and players capable of making an immediate impact. Recruitment departments, by contrast, must also consider what the squad should look like three or four years from now.
REUTERSREUTERS
They are responsible for succession planning, protecting future asset value and ensuring today's decisions do not become tomorrow's limitations.
This is where alignment moves beyond philosophy and becomes a practical challenge.
The strongest football organisations are not those where one department consistently overrides another. They are those where immediate demands are balanced against longer-term ambitions through a shared framework for decision-making. Recruitment should strengthen the manager's ability to
compete today while continuing to move the club towards its broader football vision.
When that balance is achieved, recruitment becomes proactive rather than reactive.
Decisions are guided by clearly defined principles rather than immediate pressures, allowing the club to progress with consistency instead of drifting between competing ideas.
For Everton, this may prove to be the defining test of the club's new Football Leadership Team. Establishing a collaborative model is one step.
Sustaining collective direction when football priorities inevitably diverge will be the greater measure of whether the club's new approach can deliver lasting success.
Every football model is ultimately judged not by straightforward decisions, but by the difficult ones.
Identifying areas of the squad that require strengthening is rarely contentious. The greater challenge lies in determining the type of player who best serves both the immediate needs of the first team and the club's broader football vision.
This is where Everton's new approach enters its most important phase.
Everton's recent appointments and recruitment activity indicate a greater emphasis on profiling, data analysis and long-term squad planning. At the same time, David Moyes has returned with
responsibility for delivering immediate results in one of football's most demanding environments.
The two objectives are not inherently incompatible. They do, however, create natural points of tension.
A recruitment department may identify a younger player whose profile aligns with the club's long-term vision, offering development potential, resale value and succession planning.
A head coach, meanwhile, may favour a player with greater Premier League experience who can contribute immediately, even if that player offers less long-term value.
Action Images via ReutersAction Images via Reuters
Neither decision is inherently correct. Each reflects a different responsibility within the football club.
The challenge for Everton is ensuring those decisions are guided by a shared football philosophy rather than individual preference. If recruitment profiles are consistently adjusted to meet short-term demands, the club risks drifting away from the strategic planning its Football Leadership Team was established to deliver.
Conversely, if long-term planning fails to reflect the competitive realities facing the coaching staff, the club risks creating a model that becomes disconnected from the demands of Premier League football.
The strongest recruitment models are built on compromise rather than control. Managers should have a significant voice in identifying the qualities they need within their squad, but recruitment should also protect the club's broader interests.
Sustainable football organisations recruit for the club first and the coach second, ensuring each managerial appointment inherits a squad built around a consistent football identity rather than beginning another cycle of reconstruction.
That is the balance Everton must now strike. The success of the club's Football Leadership Team will not be determined by whether recruitment or coaching consistently prevails in individual debates, but by whether both are working towards the same long-term destination.
Everton's football leadership structure has beendesigned to encourage collaboration rather than concentrate authority within a single department. Recruitment, analytics, player trading and coaching all contribute to the decision-making process, with executive oversight intended to ensure alignment across the organisation.
However, this raises an important governance question.
Who is ultimately responsible for protecting Everton's football philosophy?
Executive leadership and football leadership are not necessarily the same thing. A Chief Executive's responsibility is to oversee the performance of the entire organisation, balancing football operations with commercial strategy, governance and ownership objectives.
That role requires broad organisational leadership rather than specialist expertise in squad construction and long-term football planning.
The responsibility for defining and safeguarding a club's football identity is a different challenge altogether.
It requires consistent judgement on recruitment profiles, succession planning, tactical evolution, academy integration and the balance between short-term performance and long-term squad development. These decisions shape the direction of a football club long after individual managers and players have moved on.
This is why many leading European clubs appoint a senior football figure to provide continuity in their sporting strategy. Regardless
of title, that individual provides continuity between managers, protects the club's recruitment principles and ensures football decisions remain consistent with a long-term vision.
The objective is not to diminish the influence of the head coach. Managers should play a central role in identifying the qualities required within their squad. Equally important, executive leadership provides accountability and organisational stability.
The challenge is ensuring neither becomes the sole driver of football strategy.
When recruitment philosophy becomes too closely aligned with the preferences of a single manager, clubs risk repeating the cycle of rebuilding every time leadership changes.
Conversely, when football decisions become detached from the realities of coaching, recruitment can lose sight of what the first team actually needs.
The strongest organisations establish a permanent football philosophy that sits above individual appointments. Managers influence that philosophy, recruitment executes it, and executive leadership ensures the structure functions effectively. In that model, the club's identity belongs to the institution rather than any one individual.
For Everton, that may represent the next stage in the evolution of the club's football structure. The success of the current model will depend not only on collaboration, but also on whether there is a clear football voice capable of safeguarding the club's long-term identity through periods of change.
Recruitment departments are often judged by the quality of individual signings. A player succeeds and the process is praised. A player struggles and the process is questioned. In reality, this is an incomplete way of evaluating recruitment.
No recruitment model is capable of eliminating mistakes. Even Europe's most respected sporting departments make signings that fail to meet expectations. What separates successful organisations is not perfection, but consistency. They trust the process because, over time, it produces more correct decisions than poor ones.
For Everton, the success of the club's football structure should therefore be judged by broader indicators than the outcome of individual transfer windows.
Is the average age profile of the squad moving towards its long-term objectives?
Are succession plans in place before key players decline or leave?
Are younger signings receiving the opportunities required to develop into first-team contributors?
Is the club creating assets that retain or increase their market value?
Does each transfer window move the squad closer to a clearly identifiable football identity?
These questions are far more revealing than whether one signing scores ten goals or another struggles to adapt.
Perhaps the most important measure of all is consistency. If Everton's recruitment philosophy remains stable regardless of changes in management, ownership pressures or short-term fluctuations in results, the club will have created something far more valuable than a successful transfer window: a sustainable football model.
That is ultimately the purpose of any modern recruitment structure. Not simply to identify talented players, but to ensure every decision contributes to a long-term vision that survives beyond individual seasons and individual managers.
Everton's new football structure represents more than an internal reorganisation. It reflects an attempt to modernise the way the club makes football decisions, replacing reliance on individual personalities with a collaborative model built around specialist expertise.
The principles behind that approach are difficult to dispute. Recruitment, analytics, player trading and coaching should all contribute to building a stronger football club. Modern squad building is too complex for any one individual to possess every answer.
However, structures are only as effective as the alignment within them.
If recruitment identifies players for the future while coaching prioritises only the present, the club risks pursuing competing objectives. If football philosophy changes with every managerial appointment, long-term planning becomes increasingly difficult to sustain.
Likewise, if executive oversight lacks a permanent football custodian capable of protecting the club's sporting identity, strategy risks becoming reactive rather than enduring.
The strongest football clubs are not defined by perfect recruitment. They are defined by consistency of purpose. Managers, executives and recruitment departments all play essential roles, but the club's football identity must remain constant regardless of who occupies those positions.
For Everton, the foundations of a modern football operation now appear to be in place. The challenge is ensuring those foundations are supported by a clear and consistent football philosophy that outlasts individual managers, transfer windows and changing priorities.
Ultimately, the purpose of recruitment is not to win the next transfer window. It is to build a football club that no longer needs rebuilding every time circumstances change. If Everton's new structure can achieve that level of alignment, it will represent far more than organisational reform. It will provide the foundations for sustainable success.