Arsenal have offered one of their brightest young players to Chelsea and Manchester United - and it’s a decision which could easily backfire badly.
Just 18 months ago, Myles Lewis-Skelly looked like one of the most gifted young players in the Premier League. His combination of technical talent and raw confidence made him look like a player with almost limitless potential. His future seemed to be dazzlingly bright. Now Arsenal are trying to sell him.
placeholder image
Getty Images
According to The Guardian – and a number of other outlets who have picked up the story – the 19-year-old has been offered to both Manchester United and Chelsea as the Gunners attempt to recoup some of the cash spent on signing Bruno Guimarães, whose arrival will inevitably rob Lewis-Skelly of opportunities to play in midfield.
Given the direction his career seemed to be taking before the beginning of last season, it’s an eyebrow-raising decision. It’s also one which raises questions about the way that Arsenal develop young talent, and which could greatly benefit one of their potential rivals for future titles and top four placings.
Will Myles Lewis-Skelly sign for Manchester United or Chelsea this summer?
Myles Lewis-Skelly has been with Arsenal since he was nine - but may now be on the moveplaceholder image
Myles Lewis-Skelly has been with Arsenal since he was nine - but may now be on the move | Getty Images
According to The Guardian, both Manchester United and Chelsea have been contacted to be made aware of Lewis-Skelly’s availability, although the transfer fee they would expect to receive remains unknown. That is, of course, a crucial piece of the puzzle – if Arsenal believe that they can walk away with an especially handsome sum, then it might serve to justify the decision to move on from one of their brightest young stars.
Arsenal’s decision comes shortly after they confirmed the signing of Newcastle’s Guimarães for an estimated £75m, a deal which means that there are four expensive senior players jostling for the midfield positions that Lewis-Skelly might have hoped to occupy – Guimarães, Declan Rice, Martín Zubimendi and Mikel Merino, although the latter has perhaps played his best football in England in a more advanced role.
Lewis-Skelly is also an accomplished left-back, of course, and first broke into Arsenal’s first team in that position, only to found his minutes eaten into by Riccardo Calafiori and Piero Hincapié, whose loan move from Bayer Leverkusen was made permanent this summer. Everywhere the teenager has looked, he has seen another door slammed in his face.
The only remaining opening seem to be at other sides. Chelsea have sold Andrey Santos and could yet sell the discontented Enzo Fernández to Manchester City – the various parties involved are likely to make their decisions about a move over the coming days – and could use an extra midfielder, and Lewis-Skelly’s technical style of play should suit Xabi Alonso’s system. The anticipated signing of Pep Chavarría will give them options at left-back, but Lewis-Skelly’s versatility would surely increase his appeal.
Manchester United probably have the greater need, however. A left-back and a third new midfielder are their priorities in the final weeks of the transfer window, and Lewis-Skelly would provide an option in both positions at a pinch.
Their first-choice target in defence had been Lewis Hall, but Newcastle are adamant that they won’t be selling any more key players. There are other options on their shortlist, notably RB Leipzig’s David Raum, but Lewis-Skelly represents a slightly more well-rounded choice with immense potential.
Without an overview of the finances that are likely to be involved in such a deal, a full assessment of Lewis-Skelly’s likely destination is impossible, and nor is it certain that either Chelsea or Manchester United will accept the offer extended to them - but the chance that he leaves the Emirates now seems high. The question is whether it’s a good idea for Arsenal to let such a promising player leave in the first place.
What Arsenal’s decision to sell Lewis-Skelly says about their youth policy
Lewis-Skelly has been playing regularly in midfield in pre-season - but the arrival of Bruno Guimarães is likely to reduce his opportunitiesplaceholder image
Lewis-Skelly has been playing regularly in midfield in pre-season - but the arrival of Bruno Guimarães is likely to reduce his opportunities | Getty Images
The thought process from Arsenal’s side seems clear enough: They have enough senior options at full-back and in midfield to go without Lewis-Skelly, a valuable asset whose sale could make it easier for them to sign the left winger that they believe they need to turn a title-winning team into long-term contenders.
It also marks the next logical step in a process which has seen them go from being one of English football’s premier producers of young talents during the Arsène Wenger years to being a club at which youngsters find it difficult to get opportunities. In the last few seasons, only Bukayo Saka has successfully completed the transition from academy to regular starter.
Given the length of their wait for a Premier League title, the philosophical shift away from developing young talent and towards purchasing ready-made stars has arguably been justified already. The question is whether there should be more of a balance.
Lewis-Skelly isn’t the only player who has broken through, demonstrated preternatural talent, and then found himself back on the fringes in the blink of an eye. Winger Ethan Nwaneri is currently enduring a similar trajectory – sent on an unsuitable loan spell to Marseille last season, the 19-year-old’s progress seems to have stalled somewhat and his opportunities look likely to be limited over the course of the coming year.
Nwaneri has plenty of time left to get back on track, but Arsenal essentially declined the chance to work him into the first-team rotation more frequently with the signing of Noni Madueke last year, and could have hampered the development of another exceptionally gifted player in the process. He may not become a ‘what could have been’ player, but the chances of it have increased to an extent that would have seemed surprising when he first began to make his name.
Folarin Balogun is another player who found himself banging his head against the door of the first team not so long ago. He scored two goals in his 10 senior appearances for Arsenal but ended up being sold for €30m (£26m) to Monaco. Now he could be moving to Tottenham Hotspur for twice as much.
Max Dowman is another talented youngster who faces an uphill battle to break into Arsenal's first teamplaceholder image
Max Dowman is another talented youngster who faces an uphill battle to break into Arsenal's first team | Getty Images
Arsenal have ceased to be a team at which young players know they will be given opportunities to shine, and while last season’s successes arguably provide full justification for almost every decision made since Mikel Arteta took the reins, the club are robbing themselves of the chance to develop home-grown players into genuine starters at both a financial cost, perhaps, an emotional one. Supporters love little more than the feeling of getting behind one of their own.
Lewis-Skelly was also more than simply a bright prospect. His performances in the second half of the 2024/25 season, which earned him his first England caps, were exceptional even by the standards of more experienced players. Perhaps players like Guimarães and Hincapié are even better as it stands, but one wonders whether Arsenal will regret the decision to move him on in the future given that he was already good enough at the highest level and has presumably not yet reached his ceiling.
It also begs a question about how Arsenal will bring on Max Dowman, the precocious 16-year-old who made 13 senior appearances last season before he even sat down to do his GCSEs. If the club don’t leave enough gaps in the squad to give him first-team opportunities, then one wonders how he might fulfil his staggering talent.
Right now, Arsenal are telling young players that they are likely to have a brighter future and more opportunities elsewhere. It may not be the best message to send in the long term, although if they keep winning trophies then it will be fair to ask whether it truly matters.
In the short term, however, the fact is that Arsenal have spent a considerable sum on players who have made Lewis-Skelly’s position in the squad untenable, and the most likely beneficiaries of that decision will be the very same clubs that the Gunners could end up competing against for honours in the coming years. Should Arsenal fall short while sides like Manchester United and Chelsea thrive off the back of talent developed on Arsenal’s training grounds, then their handling of young talent and their broader transfer policy may start to look rather less sensible.