> **PatsFanFromNH**
>
> I have to go with the pass rush. We have solid RBs & CBs, we have a good starting O-Line, and I’m not as concerned with depth as I am with starting effectiveness & force, and we’re lacking the ability to get to the QB.
>
> **Bajer**
>
> i was edge concerned until the recent injuries to the injuries to the guards/c -- van roten is a good emergency signing, but can a guy hold upiin there who is 36 and has taken a pounding for 14 years?
>
> **VaEagle85**
>
> I’m going LB followed by Edge. I have some faith that a couple of the young guys will be pleasant surprises on the Edge, so maybe some okay depth there. Not feeling the same about LB. I remember being a little shocked when Chaisson signed with the Commanders and the amount he signed for, wondering why the Pats had not offered at least that much. Losing him was pretty big and seems like an unforced error frankly.
>
> **Leoa888**
>
> Edge. Harold Landry isn’t doing anything right now. Say on top of Jones and Ponder, Hutchins, Swinson, and Jacas all turn out to be better long term than Landry. When it’s time to bring Landry back, we’re going to have to give up a good young player just to justify Harold “Culture Guy” Landry.
>
> **Felkey**
>
> At this very moment, I’ll stick with oline. We know AVT is basically a ticking time bomb (and Wilson and Campbell both got hurt last year - granted one time is not a pattern, could just be bad luck) so this depth is more important than at other positions imo. Assuming Ben Brown comes back early season and Roten gets up to speed quickly, I’d shift to edge which is a very close second for me.