Burnham said he would be “really concerned” if City’s Abu Dhabi owners sold the club in the wake of being found to have breached the Premier League’s financial rules
Bookmark popover
Independent Membership
Become an Independent member to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Membership today.
Join today
Already a member? Log in
Your support helps us to tell the story
Read moreSupport Now
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
**Your support makes all the difference.**Read more
A spokesperson for Andy Burnham has insisted the guilty verdict against Manchester City is “serious” after remarks the Prime Minister made about the case on Wednesday raised eyebrows.
Burnham told the BBC on Wednesday he would be “really concerned” if City’s Abu Dhabi owners sold the club in the wake of City being found to have breached the Premier League’s financial rules by an independent commission, crediting them with being “a huge partner in the building of modern Manchester”.
Burnham also appeared to draw parallels between City’s guilty verdict and the handling of a disciplinary case against Everton, the club he supports.
He said he still held the view very firmly that the Toffees were “not fairly treated” and added: “I remember people proclaiming Everton guilty at the time and with hindsight I think more people would say that wasn’t fair, the way that was handled.
Andy Burnham spoke out on the Man City verdict on Wednesday
Andy Burnham spoke out on the Man City verdict on Wednesday (Reuters)
“So it would be wrong of me to leap to one side given the experience that I’d had before becoming Prime Minister.”
Burnham’s comments have drawn criticism on social media and shadow sports minister Louie French called for the Government to “keep politics out of football”, with the case set to proceed to an appeal board and a sanctions hearing.
A No 10 Downing Street spokesman said on Thursday: “As the Prime Minister made clear, the initial judgement is serious and there can’t be any suggestion that anyone is above the rules.
“He also stressed that it is an ongoing independent process. It is essential that it is allowed to run its course and the outcome respected.
“If wrongdoing is established, those responsible should face the appropriate consequences.”
Meanwhile, a parliamentary select committee wants answers from the permanent secretary of Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) regarding any tax implications of the City case.
The chair of the Treasury Committee, Dame Meg Hillier, has written to JP Marks asking whether he is aware of the commission’s findings, in particular what it said about the use of “sham” arrangements to conceal liabilities to staff.
Hillier also asked Marks whether he had asked for an unredacted copy of the decision published on Tuesday.
“While I acknowledge that taxpayer confidentiality may inhibit what you can disclose, I would welcome reassurance from HMRC that you are seized of the importance of these issues and the public interest in the case,” Hillier wrote.
City are expected to lodge an appeal against the guilty verdict before Friday’s deadline, having claimed the commission’s decision contained “clear material errors, of law, principle and fact, and is unsafe”.