rousingthekop.com

Michael Owen hits the nail on the head as he delivers his verdict on Liverpool’s Lewis Koumas

Photo by Gaspafotos/MB Media/Getty Images

Photo by Gaspafotos/MB Media/Getty Images

A graphic showing Joe Cole's quotes on Andoni Iraola reading: "I feel for Andoni. He's the right man, but it could be the wrong time.” Image shows Liverpool FC manager Andoni Iraola.

Credit: Photo by Shaun Brooks – CameraSport via Getty Images

Italian journalist explains Andy Diouf transfer situation amid Liverpool, Barcelona and PSG interest

Italian journalist explains Andy Diouf transfer situation amid Liverpool, Barcelona and PSG interest

Joe Cole comes to a sad conclusion about Virgil van Dijk at Liverpool after Man City loss

Joe Cole comes to a sad conclusion about Virgil van Dijk at Liverpool after Man City loss

Liverpool fans will appreciate what Paul Scholes had to say about Lewis Koumas despite Man City loss

Liverpool fans will appreciate what Paul Scholes had to say about Lewis Koumas despite Man City loss

Liverpool fans have every right to question Man City rivalry after Premier League findings

Liverpool fans have every right to question Man City rivalry after Premier League findings

Liverpool fans divided over what they saw after Ryan Gravenberch's Man City red card

Liverpool fans divided over what they saw after Ryan Gravenberch's Man City red card

Photo by Pier Marco Tacca/Getty Images

Photo by Pier Marco Tacca/Getty Images

Photo by Alex Pantling/Getty Images

Photo by Alex Pantling/Getty Images

Virgil van Dijk for Liverpool

Photo by Liverpool FC/Liverpool FC via Getty Images

Photo by Steven Halliwell/MI News/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Photo by Steven Halliwell/MI News/NurPhoto via Getty Images

A graphic posing the question: "Where does Florian Wirtz go from here?" Image shows Florian Wirtz playing for Liverpool FC.

Credit: Photo by Michael Regan/Getty Images

Photo by Michael Regan/Getty Images

Photo by Michael Regan/Getty Images

Up until recently, Reds fans just had to accept they came up short in those title races. But that has now changed following the Premier League’s findings.

An independent commission has found City guilty of 114 breaches of Premier League rules. The club have appealed, and the question of sanctions remains separate. But after years of waiting for the case to reach this stage, supporters on the Red half of Merseyside are entitled to ask what the findings mean for a rivalry that defined much of the Jurgen Klopp era.

Brendan Rodgers

Should Liverpool have been more successful under Jurgen Klopp?

The Klopp-Pep rivalry was one of the most entertaining and dramatic spectacles in the league’s history.

Pep, on paper, came out on top. But would things have been different if City had not been able to spend so much money?

Liverpool West Derby MP Ian Byrne has described the situation as a ‘farce’, with plenty of supporters no doubt echoing that frustration. The concern is not simply about whether City will be punished. It is about how long the process has taken and what that says about the Premier League’s ability to police its own competition.

Many teams may have an axe to grind with the Sky Blues following the 114 charges, but it feels especially personal for the Reds given how exceptional they had to be when trying to best City.

Take the 2018/19 season, for example. Liverpool lost just once in the Premier League, finished with 97 points and still came second. Manchester City won the title with 98. It was an extraordinary campaign, but Klopp’s side had nothing to show for it in the league table beyond a runners-up finish.

Liverpool, to their credit, responded by winning the title the following season with 99 points, finishing 18 clear of City.

Yet fans may still think back to the campaign prior and how things could have been different following news of the charges against City coming to light this year.

The Premier League’s original charges, announced in February 2023, covered alleged breaches between 2009/10 and 2017/18. The commission’s findings, announced in September 2026, established 114 breaches, which City have challenged via an appeal.

Yes, that period does not cover the aforementioned campaigns and beyond, and we can’t say for sure that the Reds would have had more success in different circumstances.

However, what would the Premier League have looked like had City instead kept within the rules?

The absence of an alternative league table does not make the questions irrelevant. Liverpool supporters watched their team push City to the limit, sometimes falling short by a single point. They have a legitimate interest in understanding the circumstances surrounding that competition.

There is a difference between questioning the context of a rivalry and dismissing everything achieved within it.

Liverpool fans can do the former without sacrificing pride in the latter. But three years of waiting for a verdict on the original charges have taken their toll.

Patience will be needed in the Manchester City case

It is easy to demand an immediate verdict from the outside. The reality is that a case involving financial records, commercial arrangements and complex legal arguments requires a proper examination of the evidence and an appeal must also be heard fairly.

Even so, the length of the process is difficult to ignore. For supporters, the issue has become a fixture of football discussion without a definitive conclusion. Every new development brings another round of debate about possible sanctions, while the central questions remain subject to further proceedings.

The Premier League cannot be blamed for every complication that arises in a case of this size. But it must recognise that prolonged uncertainty carries a cost of its own. Supporters are asked to accept the competition’s rules and trust that they apply to every club. When a case with such serious implications takes years to reach its findings, only for an appeal to follow, it is hardly surprising that patience wears thin.

This is not about expecting the authorities to bend to public opinion. The process must be fair, even if that frustrates people who want an immediate outcome. The league does, however, need to show that its disciplinary system can deal with major cases effectively. It should be able to explain where proceedings stand, what remains to be decided and how it intends to bring the matter to a conclusion.

That would not satisfy everyone. Nothing will. But supporters deserve better than a saga that seems to stretch from one season into the next without a clear endpoint.

Liverpool fans display a banner reading “No legacy is so rich as honesty” above a row of trophy icons showing the club’s honours in the stands during the match during the Premier League 2026/27 match between Liverpool FC and Manchester City

Photo by Robbie Jay Barratt – AMA/Getty Images

Fan frustration goes beyond wanting Manchester City punished

Some Liverpool supporters will want the harshest possible sanction if the commission’s findings are upheld. Others will be more concerned about the damage the case has done to the reputation of the Premier League.

It is tempting to reduce the whole affair to a question of points deductions or relegation. But the appropriate punishment must follow the rules and the outcome of the proceedings. It cannot simply be whatever would please rival supporters most.

If the findings are upheld, the consequences must reflect the breaches established and the applicable regulations. If the appeal changes the outcome, that must be acknowledged too. Neither result should be predetermined by the volume of anger surrounding the case.

Liverpool fans have every reason to want City held accountable for any breaches that are ultimately established. But they also have an interest in a system that works properly regardless of which club is involved.

Today it is City. Tomorrow, it could be another club whose finances or conduct come under scrutiny. The rules are only meaningful if the authorities can apply them consistently, including when the club at the centre of a case has enormous sporting and commercial influence.

That is why this, though it may not feel like it to some Reds, is bigger than Liverpool’s rivalry with City. It is about whether the Premier League can convince supporters that its regulations can be upheld no matter the club in question.

Liverpool’s loss to Manchester City made fans angrier

The 3-0 defeat to City on Sunday was painful enough for Liverpool supporters. Losing heavily to a major rival is never pleasant, particularly when that rival has been at the centre of such a long-running controversy.

It would be naive to pretend the result has no bearing on the mood around Merseyside. Fans are emotional, and the timing of a defeat can make existing frustrations feel considerably worse.

But the comments surrounding Byrne’s criticism point to something more than disappointment over one match. Some supporters feel worn down by the constant argument about financial rules and legal proceedings. Others insist that the controversy only strengthens their attachment to Liverpool and their pride in what the club has achieved.

I understand the latter reaction. The Reds’ history does not belong to Manchester City, the Premier League or an independent commission. The players who won the title in 2020 and 2025 still had to deliver over an entire season, and the supporters who followed them have every right to celebrate it.

Still, loyalty to Liverpool should not mean switching off questions about the sport itself. Fans can accept that their team will sometimes lose. They can live with a title race that goes against them or a season in which the manager gets things wrong, such as Arne Slot in 2025/26. What is more difficult is feeling that the arguments surrounding the competition are becoming almost as important as the football we see week in, week out.

There is a danger that the game loses some of its appeal when every discussion about a major rivalry turns into another debate about regulations, legal challenges and possible punishments. The Premier League has built a hugely successful competition. It should not take for granted the supporters whose passion makes that success possible.

Liverpool deserve a proper conclusion to this saga

Byrne’s frustration is understandable, but the strongest argument is not that City must be punished as severely as possible. It is that the Premier League needs to see this process through properly and explain the outcome.

Liverpool supporters should not have to pretend the findings are unimportant. Equally, nobody should claim that the case automatically changes the results of past title races or proves that the Merseyside outfit would have won more trophies.

So what happens now? The appeal needs to be resolved, any sanctions must be decided under the relevant rules, and the Premier League must make clear what the outcome means. That is the only way to move beyond the cycle of speculation that has surrounded the case for years.

Liverpool and City gave English football some remarkable title races. The margins were often tiny, the quality was exceptional, and the rivalry helped set the standard for the rest of the division.

Supporters have every reason to be proud of their part in that history. They also have every right to want clarity about the findings that have now emerged.

The Premier League has reached a point where it needs to show that its rules mean something and that even the most complicated cases can reach a credible conclusion. Until then, the arguments will continue. And for supporters who simply want to watch football, that is a frustrating state of affairs.

Read full news in source page