liverpool.com

Liverpool transfer news as Alex Scott contract stance emerges with Reds weighing up alternatives

Liverpool transfer news as Alex Scott's Bournemouth contract stance emerges, with the Reds considering alternative targets if they cannot secure a deal for the midfielder

Alex Scott of England acknowledges the fans following the UEFA Nations League 2026/27 group phase match between Czechia and England

Alex Scott has been linked with a transfer to Liverpool(Image: (Photo by Eddie Keogh - The FA/The FA via Getty Images))

Liverpool thrashed LASK in the Champions League on Wednesday, with summer signing Bradley Barcola scoring a hat-trick. However, further reinforcements could be needed when the January transfer window opens.

‌

‌

Andoni Iraola is gaining a clearer understanding of his squad with each passing game, identifying which players suit his style and where improvements are needed. Liverpool remains light in a couple of key areas, potentially prompting the club to return to the transfer market mid-season.

‌

With several months until the summer window, work is already underway by new sporting director Julian Ward to assess potential signings and departures as Liverpool continue to shape their squad for the future.

‌

READ MORE: Andoni Iraola explains Jeremie Frimpong and Ronald Araujo dilemma for Liverpool

Here is the Liverpool.com verdict on the transfer gossip to emerge around the Reds today.

Alex Scott (Bournemouth)

Liverpool's chances of signing Alex Scott could receive a boost in January, with the Bournemouth midfielder continuing to resist the offer of a new contract. The 23-year-old has been heavily linked with a move to Anfield, where he would reunite with Iraola after the manager left the south coast for the north-west during the summer.

According to Sky Sports, Scott has continued to refuse a new deal, leaving Bournemouth facing the prospect of considering a significant offer when the transfer window opens in January.

‌

The exact fee required to prise Scott away from the Vitality Stadium remains unclear, but Bournemouth is reportedly prepared to consider offers in excess of £80 million ($106 million), plus potential add-ons. However, the club's willingness to sanction a sale could depend on its position in the Premier League, with relegation potentially influencing its decision after a difficult start to the season.

Liverpool.com says: Scott would be a strong addition to Liverpool's midfield, offering technical quality, energy and room to develop further. However, with the likes of Ryan Gravenberch and Trey Nyoni playing a similar role, a move would need to offer a clear improvement to Iraola's options.

Manuel Kone and Lamine Camara (Roma and Monaco)

The Reds have also shortlisted Monaco midfielder Lamine Camara and Roma's Manu Kone as potential midfield options, with sources telling TeamTalk that the club are regularly scouting both players and compiling detailed reports.

‌

LIVERPOOL, ENGLAND - AUGUST 9: Lamine Camara of AS Monaco during the during the pre-season friendly match between Liverpool FC and AS Monaco at Anfield on August 9, 2026 in Liverpool, England. (Photo by Robbie Jay Barratt - AMA/Getty Images)

Lamine Camara has been linked with a move to Liverpool(Image: Getty Images)

Camara, valued at at least £47 million ($62 million), would be a more affordable alternative to Scott. The 22-year-old Senegal international has impressed with his energy, technical ability and passing range, while his age offers scope for further development.

Kone would command a higher fee, with Roma reportedly valuing the French midfielder at £65-75 million ($86million/$100 million). The 25-year-old has established himself in Serie A, combining physical strength with progressive passing and defensive work.

Liverpool.com says: Camara offers energy, technical quality and long-term potential, while Kone brings physicality and Serie A experience. Both could strengthen Liverpool's midfield, but the Reds must weigh up whether either represents an upgrade on their existing options.

Read full news in source page