nature.com

Assessing the quality and reliability of youtube information on hypertension: a comprehensive analysis

Abstract

Patient education is an important aspect in the management of hypertension and YouTube has become a popular platform for sharing hypertension-related information, but concerns persist regarding the accuracy and reliability of such content in the context of patient education. To address this issue, this cross-sectional type of observational study aims to assess YouTube’s information on hypertension using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and Reliability Score (DISCERN SCORE), which evaluate the quality and trustworthiness of the YouTube content, and the Video Power Index (VPI). Majority of the videos are uploaded by physicians (26, 33.3 percent) and most give information about causes/etiology, treatment, complications (n = 51, 65.38%) each. The median GQS for all the videos is 4. The median reliability score is 4. The statistical test used is Kruskal - Wallis Test. The p value of VPI, GQS, and Reliability score among various types of uploader are 0.264, 0.347 and 0.452. Hence, there is no statistical significance (p value > 0.05). The analysis therefore suggests that the quality of these videos is moderate. Although they usually provide accurate information, they lack comprehensiveness and may have a biased perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Change institution

Buy or subscribe

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles

$119.00 per year

only $9.92 per issue

Learn more

Buy this article

Purchase on SpringerLink

Instant access to full article PDF

Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Log in

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Read our FAQs

Contact customer support

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

World Health Organization. Hypertension. Fact Sheet. Updated 17 September 2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hypertension. Accessed 8 May 2023

Stellefson M, Chaney B, Ochipa K, Chaney D, Haider Z, Hanik B, et al. YouTube as a source of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient education: a social media content analysis. Chron Respir Dis. 2014;11:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1479972314525058

ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Lederman R, Fan H, Smith S, Chang S. Who can you trust? credibility assessment in online health forums. Health Policy Technol. 2014;3:13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2013.11.003

ArticleGoogle Scholar

Eroglu E, Altinli E. Evaluation of the reliability and quality of YouTube video content about perianal fistulas. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:2955273. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2955273

ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Rudisill SS, Saleh NZ, Hornung AL, Zbeidi S, Ali RM, Siyaji ZK, et al. YouTube as a source of information on pediatric scoliosis: a reliability and educational quality analysis. Spine Deform. 2023;11:3–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-022-00569-7

ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Batar S, Söylemez MS, Kemah B, Cepni SK. A Cross-Sectional Study on reliability and quality of YouTube® videos related to hallux valgus and evaluation of newly developed hallux valgus-specific survey tool. Digit Health. 2023;9:20552076231171239. https://doi.org/10.1177/205520762311712

ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Langford A, Loeb S. Perceived patient-provider communication quality and sociodemographic factors associated with watching health-related videos on YouTube: a cross-sectional analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:e13512. https://doi.org/10.2196/13512

ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Kaya E, Solak Y, Şahin M, Kurt B, Vural Solak GT, Üçer H. Is YouTube useful as a source of information for approaches to reducing blood pressure and hypertension treatment? Hypertens Res. 2023;46:386–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-022-01112-x

ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Kumar N, Pandey A, Venkatraman A, Garg N. Are video sharing web sites a useful source of information on hypertension? J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014;8:481–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jash.2014.05.001

ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Erten M. HbA1c and e-health: YouTube might be good for you, if you use it wisely. Acta Endocrinol. 2022;18:531–5. https://doi.org/10.4183/aeb.2022.531

ArticleGoogle Scholar

Heisinger S, Huber D, Matzner MP, Hiertz H, Lampe LP, Zagata J, et al. TLIF online videos for patient education-evaluation of comprehensiveness, quality, and reliability. Int J Env Res Public Health. 2023;20:4626. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054626

ArticleGoogle Scholar

Ertekin SC. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgical training videos on WebSurg vs YouTube platforms: a quality evaluation. J Health Sci Med. 2023;6:1109–13. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1345694

ArticleGoogle Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Guntur Medical College, Dr. N.T.R University of Health Sciences, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India

Geethiikha Jammula

Government Baroda Medical College and S.S.G. Hospital, Vadodara, India

Juhi Ardeshna-Chovatiya

St. George’s University School of Medicine, West Indies, Grenada

Nadia Djahanshahi

Saint George’s University, School of Medicine, University Centre Grenada, West Indies, Grenada

Marina Samuel Basta

Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, India

Krishna Amarlal Katariya

Sohar Extended Health Centre, Sohar, Oman

Iorwuese Ali Daniel

B. J. Medical College and Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, India

Saumya Joshi

Authors

Geethiikha Jammula

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

2. Juhi Ardeshna-Chovatiya

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

3. Nadia Djahanshahi

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

4. Marina Samuel Basta

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

5. Krishna Amarlal Katariya

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

6. Iorwuese Ali Daniel

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

7. Saumya Joshi

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Geethiikha Jammula (GJ), Juhi Ardeshna-Chovatiya (JAC), Nadia Djahanshahi (ND), Marina Samuel Basta (MSB), Krishna Amarlal Katariya (KAK), Iorwuese Ali Daniel (IAD), and, Saumya Joshi (SJ). The first draft of the manuscript was written by GJ, JAC, ND, MSB, KAK, IAD, and SJ, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geethiikha Jammula.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The present study utilized information from publicly accessible YouTube channels, and thus was deemed exempt from ethical approval.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jammula, G., Ardeshna-Chovatiya, J., Djahanshahi, N. et al. Assessing the quality and reliability of youtube information on hypertension: a comprehensive analysis. J Hum Hypertens (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-025-00999-6

Download citation

Received:22 June 2024

Revised:05 February 2025

Accepted:25 February 2025

Published:07 March 2025

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-025-00999-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Get shareable link

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Copy to clipboard

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Read full news in source page