Scientists have dated the skeleton of an ancient child that caused a stir when it was first discovered to between 27,700 and 28,600 years ago
Forearm bone fragments belonging to an ancient child that appeared to have features from both humans and Neanderthalsopen image in gallery
Forearm bone fragments belonging to an ancient child that appeared to have features from both humans and Neanderthals (João Zilhão via AP)
Your support helps us to tell the story
Support Now
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.
Scientists have dated the skeleton of an ancient child, that carries features from both humans and Neanderthals, to between 27,700 and 28,600 years ago.
The nearly complete skeleton of the ‘Lapedo child' was discovered 27 years ago in a rock shelter called Lagar Velho in central Portugal. It was stained red, and scientists think it may have been wrapped in a painted animal skin before burial.
At the time, scientists noted that some of the humanlike child’s attributes — including body proportions and jawbone — looked Neanderthal and suggested that the child was descended from populations in which humans and Neanderthals mated and mixed.
While it was a radical notion at the time, advances in genetics have since proven those populations existed — and people today still carry Neanderthal DNA.
But trying to figure out when exactly the child lived has been difficult.
Small roots had grown through the bones and contamination — from plants or other sources — made it impossible for scientists to use traditional carbon dating to measure the child's age. They instead dated the charcoal and animal bones around the skeleton to between 27,700 and 29,700 years ago.
Techniques have improved, and researchers reported on Friday in the journal Science Advances that they were able to date the skeleton by measuring part of a protein that's found primarily in human bones.
Forearm bone fragments belonging to an ancient child that appeared to have features from both humans and Neanderthalsopen image in gallery
Forearm bone fragments belonging to an ancient child that appeared to have features from both humans and Neanderthals (João Zilhão via AP)
Examining part of a crushed arm, they revealed that the earlier estimate was in the ballpark: the skeleton was from between 27,700 and 28,600 years ago.
“Being able to successfully date the child felt like giving them back a tiny piece of their story, which is a huge privilege,” said Bethan Linscott, a study author now at the University of Miami, in an email.
She noted the initial discovery was more than a skeleton — it was also the grave of a young child. When dating the bones, she couldn’t help but wonder who loved the child, what made them laugh and what their world looked like in the short four years they walked the planet.
Paul Pettitt, an archaeologist at Durham University in England who was not involved with the new research said in an email that the study is an example of how dating methods are becoming more effective and helping scientists better understand the past.
The study of where humans came from is important “for the same reason we keep the portraits of our parents and grandparents,” said study author João Zilhão from the University of Lisbon.
“It's a way of remembering,” he said.