Sir Jim Ratcliffe with Sir Alex Ferguson at Wembley
Sir Jim Ratcliffe left Sir Alex Ferguson feeling 'grumpy'
Sir Jim Ratcliffe has hailed Sir Alex Ferguson for agreeing to end his £2million-a-year deal with Manchester United - even if he was 'grumpy' to be told about it.
Ferguson, who managed the Red Devils for 27 trophy-laden years, has been an ambassador for the club during his retirement. But with United losing huge sums of money in recent times, part-owner Ratcliffe informed the legendary ex-manager that they couldn't afford to keep paying him.
That led to a face-to-face meeting between the pair last year, with reports saying that it was Ratcliffe who made the call - although the Manchester-born billionaire insists that it was ultimately Ferguson's. "I take my hat off to Alex," Ratcliffe explained when asked about the decision.
"I sat down with Alex, just the two of us in the room, and I said, 'Look, the club isn't where you may think it is. It is spending more than it's earning and we're going to finish up in some difficulties. Honestly, we can't really afford to continue to pay you £2million a year'.
[
Sir Jim Ratcliffe gives backing to Ruben Amorim despite Man Utd woe - 'He's doing a great job'](https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/jim-ratcliffe-ruben-amorim-manutd-34834336)
"I said, 'I'm going to leave it with you, let you have a think about it'. It was very grown up. Maybe a little bit grumpy at the beginning but he got it, and he came back three days later, after talking to his son, and said, 'Fine, I'm going to step away from it. My decision'.
"I think it reflects really well on Alex, because he put the club before himself."
Ratcliffe, who owns a 28.94 percent stake in the club, made the bombshell revelation that United would've 'run out of cash' by the end of this year had they not implemented cost-cutting measures. This has included axing free lunches for staff, cutting 250 job roles - with another 200 at risk - and ending a £40,000-a-year donation to a charity supporting former players.
"I just think when you are in a period of change, it is disruptive," Ratcliffe, who's faced backlash following the club's decisions, added to BBC Sport. "It does, if you will excuse the pun, take people's eye off the ball a bit. We have got a club which was in a level of financial difficulty.
Should Sir Alex Ferguson have remained a paid ambassador? Have your say in the comments section.
MANCHESTER, ENGLAND - JANUARY 16: Sir Jim Ratcliffe arrives at the stadium prior to the Premier League match between Manchester United FC and Southampton FC at Old Trafford on January 16, 2025 in Manchester, England. (Photo by Ash Donelon/Manchester United via Getty Images)
Sir Jim Ratcliffe has made a series of unpopular cost-cutting decisions
"Manchester United would have run out of cash by the end of this year - by the end of 2025 - after having me put $300m (£232.72m) in and if we buy no new players in the summer. If we hadn't have implemented the cost programmes and restructuring that we have done over the last 12 months.
"So we have to deal with all those things, and there's only so many things you can deal with at once. We have a new management team, we have to deal with the financial restructure, then we have to move on to the squad, data analysis, and moving forward.
"But we are in the process of change and it's an uncomfortable period and disruptive and I do feel sympathy with the fans."
Join our new MAN UTD WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Manchester United content from Mirror Football. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.