nature.com

Weather anomalies cannot explain insect decline

arising from: J. Müller et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06402-z (2023).After a long-term study signalled a 76% drop in insect biomass in less than three decades in German-protected nature areas1, insect declines are now assigned to a multitude of anthropogenic factors2,3. A recent reanalysis4 of the insect biomass data of a previous study1 has suggested, however, that the declines are well explained by time-lagged weather anomalies, whereas new data collected by another study4 suggest that the declining trend has reversed in recent years (after 2016). Here we render these conclusions as invalid, on the basis of a critical review of methods and a reanalysis of the results. With evidence for insect biomass declining further, we argue for more standardized research to examine future trends and rigorous statistics to uncover the relative importance of contributing factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Change institution

Buy or subscribe

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

$29.99 / 30 days

cancel any time

Learn more

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Learn more

Buy this article

Purchase on SpringerLink

Instant access to full article PDF

Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Log in

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Read our FAQs

Contact customer support

Fig. 1: Flying insect biomass from four studies using Malaise traps in Germany.Fig. 2: Lack of weather anomaly effects.

Data availability

Data of the NRW as well as habitat classification of the validation data and R code can be found on Zenodo16 (https://zenodo.org/records/14258659). All other datasets can be retrieved from the respective sources (refs. 1,4,5).

ReferencesHallmann, C. A. et al. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS ONE 12, e0185809 (2017).Article 

PubMed 

PubMed Central 

MATH 

Google Scholar 

Wagner, D. L., Grames, E. M., Forister, M. L., Berenbaum, M. R. & Stopak, D. Insect decline in the Anthropocene: death by a thousand cuts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2023989118 (2021).Article 

PubMed 

PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Rumohr, Q. et al. Drivers and pressures behind insect decline in central and western Europe based on long-term monitoring data. PLoS ONE 18, e0289565 (2023).Article 

PubMed 

PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Müller, J. et al. Weather explains the decline and rise of insect biomass over 34 years. Nature 628, 349–354 (2024).Article 

ADS 

PubMed 

MATH 

Google Scholar 

Mühlethaler, R. et al. No recovery in the biomass of flying insects over the last decade in German nature protected areas. Ecol. Evol. 14, e11182 (2024).Article 

PubMed 

MATH 

Google Scholar 

Hörren, T. et al. Monitoring der biodiversität flugaktiver insekten in NRW. Nat. NRW 3, 17–21 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Lehmann, G. U. C. et al. Diversity of insects in nature protected areas (DINA): an interdisciplinary German research project. Biodivers. Conserv. 30, 2605–2614 (2021).Article 

MATH 

Google Scholar 

Ssymank, A. et al. Praktische hinweise und empfehlungen zur anwendung von malaisefallen für insekten in der biodiversitätserfassung und im monitoring. Ser. Nat. 1, 1–12 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Bergman, K.-O. et al. Clear-cuts are temporary habitats, not matrix, for endangered grassland burnet moths (Zygaena spp.). J. Insect Conserv. 24, 269–277 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 

Milberg, P., Eriksson, V. & Bergman, K.-O. Assemblages of flower-visiting insects in clear-cuts are rich and dynamic. Eur. J. Entomol. 118, 182–191 (2021).Article 

MATH 

Google Scholar 

Eckerter, T., Braunisch, V., Buse, J. & Klein, A. M. Open forest successional stages and landscape heterogeneity promote wild bee diversity in temperate forests. Conserv. Sci. Practice 4, e12843 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 

Zitomer, R. A. et al. Bee diversity decreases rapidly with time since harvest in intensively managed conifer forests. Ecol. Appl. 33, e2855 (2023).Article 

PubMed 

MATH 

Google Scholar 

Hörren, T. et al. Biodiversitätsverluste in FFH-lebensraumtypen des offenlandes — ergebnisse und perspektiven eines F&E-projektes. Ser. Nat. 1, 1–26 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Anderson, D. & Burnham, K. Model Selection and Multi-Model Inference Vol. 63 (Springer, 2004).Dalton, R. M., Underwood, N. C., Inouye, D. W., Soulé, M. E. & Inouye, B. D. Long-term declines in insect abundance and biomass in a subalpine habitat. Ecosphere 14, e4620 (2023).Article 

MATH 

Google Scholar 

Hallmann, C. et al. Data accompanying “Weather anomalies cannot explain insect decline”. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14258659 (2024).Download referencesAcknowledgementsThe Project DINA was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and handled by the VDI Project Management Agency (grant number FKZ 01LC1901). The North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) monitoring was funded by the State Agency for Nature, Environment and Consumer Protection (LANUV) and the Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation and Transport of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia (MUNV). Conceptual framework and development of methodologies of the Entomological Society Krefel was funded by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection (BMUV), handled by the Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN; grant number FKZ 3516850400). We thank J. Müller and colleagues for constructive discussion.Author informationAuthors and AffiliationsRadboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsCaspar A. Hallmann, Eelke Jongejans, Henk Siepel & Hans de KroonEntomological Society Krefeld (EVK), Krefeld, GermanyCaspar A. Hallmann, Thomas Hörren & Martin SorgNIOO-KNAW, Animal Ecology, Wageningen, The NetherlandsEelke JongejansFaculty of Biology, Aquatic Ecology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, GermanyThomas HörrenNature and Biodiversity Conservation Union (NABU), Berlin, GermanyRoland Mühlethaler & Gerlind U. C. LehmannEvolutionary Ecology, Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, GermanyGerlind U. C. LehmannAuthorsCaspar A. HallmannView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in

PubMed Google ScholarEelke JongejansView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in

PubMed Google ScholarThomas HörrenView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in

PubMed Google ScholarMartin SorgView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in

PubMed Google ScholarHenk SiepelView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in

PubMed Google ScholarRoland MühlethalerView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in

PubMed Google ScholarGerlind U. C. LehmannView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in

PubMed Google ScholarHans de KroonView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in

PubMed Google ScholarContributionsC.A.H., M.S., E.J., T.H., H.S. and H.d.K. conceived the idea of the article. M.S. and T.H. obtained additional information on trap locations. C.A.H. performed the statistical analysis. T.H., G.U.C.L. and R.M. provided additional validation data. All authors wrote the manuscript.Corresponding authorCorrespondence to

Caspar A. Hallmann.Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional informationPublisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Extended data figures and tablesExtended Data Table 1 Sampling-habitat overviewFull size tableExtended Data Table 2 Decomposition of weather and habitat effects on the average (log) daily biomass from the validation data of4Full size tableSupplementary informationSupplementary InformationThis file contains Supplementary Notes, Supplementary Methods, and Supplementary References.Reporting SummaryRights and permissionsReprints and permissionsAbout this articleCite this articleHallmann, C.A., Jongejans, E., Hörren, T. et al. Weather anomalies cannot explain insect decline.

Nature (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08528-0Download citationReceived: 13 November 2023Accepted: 13 December 2024Published: 12 March 2025DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08528-0Share this articleAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Get shareable linkSorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.Copy to clipboard

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Read full news in source page