Abstract
Remembering past information (such as recalling the items needed for a favourite recipe while at the grocery store) can sometimes be difficult. To support such retrospective memory-based tasks in everyday life, people engage in cognitive offloading, defined as the use of physical action (such as writing a shopping list) to reduce internal memory demand. In this Review, we summarize the literature on cognitive offloading for retrospective memory-based tasks. Although laboratory studies have demonstrated that cognitive offloading has benefits for task performance, it is not without costs. For example, unexpectedly losing access to offloaded notes results in poorer performance than relying on internal memory alone. We also consider factors that might lead to variability in the use and benefits of cognitive offloading, such as working memory capacity and age. Indeed, given that older adults exhibit poorer performance in some aspects of retrospective memory than young adults, this group might especially benefit from cognitive offloading in everyday life. Future research should focus on better understanding how, for whom, and under what conditions offloading improves performance to provide maximal benefits while also minimizing the costs associated with cognitive offloading in real-world settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access through your institution
Change institution
Buy or subscribe
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$59.00 per year
only $4.92 per issue
Learn more
Buy this article
Purchase on SpringerLink
Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options:
Log in
Learn about institutional subscriptions
Read our FAQs
Contact customer support
Fig. 1: Laboratory-based retrospective memory offloading paradigms.
References
McDaniel, M. A. & Einstein, G. O. Prospective Memory: An Overview and Synthesis of an Emerging Field (SAGE, 2007).
Risko, E. F. & Gilbert, S. J. Cognitive offloading. Trends Cognit. Sci. 20, 676–688 (2016).
Google Scholar
Dobbs, A. R. & Rule, B. G. Prospective memory and self-reports of memory abilities in older adults. Can. J. Psychol. 41, 209–222 (1987).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Bouazzaoui, B. et al. Aging and self-reported internal and external memory strategy uses: the role of executive functioning. Acta Psychol. 135, 59–66 (2010).
Google Scholar
Lovelace, E. A. & Twohig, P. T. Healthy older adults’ perceptions of their memory functioning and use of mnemonics. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 28, 115–118 (1990).
Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M. A computer network model of human transactive memory. Soc. Cogn. 13, 319–339 (1995).
Google Scholar
Fisher, M., Goddu, M. K. & Keil, F. C. Searching for explanations: how the Internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144, 674–687 (2015).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Choi, H.-Y., Kensinger, E. A. & Rajaram, S. Mnemonic transmission, social contagion, and emergence of collective memory: influence of emotional valence, group structure, and information distribution. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 146, 1247–1265 (2017).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Congleton, A. R. & Rajaram, S. Collaboration changes both the content and the structure of memory: building the architecture of shared representations. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 143, 1570–1584 (2014).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rajaram, S. & Pereira-Pasarin, L. P. Collaborative memory: cognitive research and theory. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5, 649–663 (2010).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Greeley, G. D., Peña, T. & Rajaram, S. Social remembering in the digital age: implications for virtual study, work, and social engagement. Mem. Mind Media 1, e13 (2022).
Google Scholar
Marsh, E. J. & Rajaram, S. The digital expansion of the mind: implications of Internet usage for memory and cognition. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 8, 1–14 (2019).
Google Scholar
Morrison, A. B. & Richmond, L. L. Offloading items from memory: individual differences in cognitive offloading in a short-term memory task. Cogn. Res. Princ. Implic. 5, 1 (2020).
PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Kelly, M. O. & Risko, E. F. Offloading memory: serial position effects. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 26, 1347–1353 (2019).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Risko, E. F. & Dunn, T. L. Storing information in-the-world: metacognition and cognitive offloading in a short-term memory task. Conscious. Cogn. 36, 61–74 (2015).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, H. S., Grinschgl, S., Papenmeier, F. & Gilbert, S. J. Individual differences in cognitive offloading: a comparison of intention offloading, pattern copy, and short-term memory capacity. Cogn. Res. 6, 34 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fellers, C. & Storm, B. C. The saving enhanced memory effect can be observed when only a subset of items are saved. Mem. Cogn. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-024-01545-4 (2024).
Berry, E. D. J., Allen, R. J., Mon-Williams, M. & Waterman, A. H. Cognitive offloading: structuring the environment to improve children’s working memory task performance. Cogn. Sci. 43, e12770 (2019).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Bulley, A., McCarthy, T., Gilbert, S. J., Suddendorf, T. & Redshaw, J. Children devise and selectively use tools to offload cognition. Curr. Biol. 30, 3457–3464.e3 (2020).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Redshaw, J., Vandersee, J., Bulley, A. & Gilbert, S. J. Development of children’s use of external reminders for hard-to-remember intentions. Child. Dev. 89, 2099–2108 (2018).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Armitage, K. L., Bulley, A. & Redshaw, J. Developmental origins of cognitive offloading. Proc. R. Soc. B. 287, 20192927 (2020).
PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Burnett, L. K. & Richmond, L. L. Just write it down: similarity in the benefit from cognitive offloading in young and older adults. Mem. Cogn. 51, 1580–1592 (2023).
Google Scholar
Burnett, L. K. & Richmond, L. L. Age-related advantage for recall of complex naturalistic information following cognitive offloading. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 38, e4217 (2024).
Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, J. M. Younger and older jurors: the influence of environmental supports on memory performance and decision making in complex trials. J. Gerontol. Ser. B: Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 55, P323–P331 (2000).
Google Scholar
Morrow, D. G. et al. Environmental support promotes expertise-based mitigation of age differences on pilot communication tasks. Psychol. Aging 18, 268–284 (2003).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Scarampi, C. & Gilbert, S. J. Age differences in strategic reminder setting and the compensatory role of metacognition. Psychol. Aging 36, 172–185 (2021).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Schryer, E. & Ross, M. The use and benefits of external memory aids in older and younger adults. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 27, 663–671 (2013).
Google Scholar
Taylor, R. G., Burnett, L. K. & Richmond, L. L. How does source impact memory for complex health-related information and cognitive offloading choice behavior?: Age comparisons for recall and recognition performance. 65th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Societyhttps://cdn.ymaws.com/www.psychonomic.org/resource/resmgr/annual_meeting/2024_meeting/abstract_book/2024_abstracts_final.pdf (2024).
Grinschgl, S., Papenmeier, F. & Meyerhoff, H. S. Consequences of cognitive offloading: boosting performance but diminishing memory. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 74, 1477–1496 (2021).
Google Scholar
Boldt, A. & Gilbert, S. J. Confidence guides spontaneous cognitive offloading. Cogn. Res. Princ. Implic. 4, 45 (2019).
PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, S. J. et al. Optimal use of reminders: metacognition, effort, and cognitive offloading. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 149, 501–517 (2020).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Ball, B. H., Peper, P., Alakbarova, D., Brewer, G. & Gilbert, S. J. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict benefits to memory from intention offloading. Memory 30, 77–91 (2022).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Sachdeva, C. & Gilbert, S. J. Excessive use of reminders: metacognition and effort-minimisation in cognitive offloading. Conscious. Cogn. 85, 103024 (2020).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Tsai, P., Sachdeva, C., Gilbert, S. J. & Scarampi, C. An investigation of the saving‐enhanced memory effect: the role of test order and list saving. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 37, 736–748 (2023).
Google Scholar
Landsiedel, J. & Gilbert, S. J. Creating external reminders for delayed intentions: dissociable influence on “task-positive” and “task-negative” brain networks. NeuroImage 104, 231–240 (2015).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Balota, D. A., Dolan, P. O. & Duchek, J. M. in Oxford Handbook of Memory (eds Tulving, E. & Craik, F. I. M.) 395–410 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2000).
Richmond, L. L. & Burnett, L. K. in Psychology of Learning and Motivation (eds Federmeier, K. D. & Payne, B. R.) vol. 77, 193–232 (Academic, 2022).
Tulving, E. & Donaldson, W. Organization of Memory 423 (Academic, 1972).
Glisky, E. L., Woolverton, C. B., McVeigh, K. S. & Grilli, M. D. Episodic memory and executive function are differentially affected by retests but similarly affected by age in a longitudinal study of normally-aging older adults. Front. Aging Neurosci. 14, 863942 (2022).
PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Liampas, I. et al. Longitudinal episodic memory trajectories in older adults with normal cognition. Clin. Neuropsychol. 37, 304–321 (2023).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Nyberg, L., Lövdén, M., Riklund, K., Lindenberger, U. & Bäckman, L. Memory aging and brain maintenance. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16, 292–305 (2012).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Kempe, M., Kalicinski, M. & Memmert, D. Naturalistic assessment of everyday memory performance among older adults. Exp. Aging Res. 41, 426–445 (2015).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Wank, A. A. et al. Eavesdropping on autobiographical memory: a naturalistic observation study of older adults’ memory sharing in daily conversations. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 14, 238 (2020).
PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Schnitzspahn, K. M., Ihle, A., Henry, J. D., Rendell, P. G. & Kliegel, M. The age-prospective memory-paradox: an exploration of possible mechanisms. Int. Psychogeriatr. 23, 583–592 (2011).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Risko, E. F. & Kelly, M. O. Offloading memory: a review. Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology (Elsevier, 2024).
Gilbert, S. J., Boldt, A., Sachdeva, C., Scarampi, C. & Tsai, P.-C. Outsourcing memory to external tools: a review of ‘intention offloading’. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 30, 60–76 (2023).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Radnan, M. J., Nicholson, R., Brookman, R. & Harris, C. B. Memory compensation strategies in everyday life: similarities and differences between younger and older adults. Sci. Rep. 13, 8404 (2023).
PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Finley, J. R., Naaz, F. & Goh, F. W. Memory and Technology (Springer International, 2018).
Richmond, L. L., Morrison, A. B., Chein, J. M. & Olson, I. R. Working memory training and transfer in older adults. Psychol. Aging 26, 813–822 (2011).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Brehmer, Y., Westerberg, H. & Backman, L. Working-memory training in younger and older adults: training gains, transfer, and maintenance. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 63 (2012).
PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Buschkuehl, M. et al. Impact of working memory training on memory performance in old-old adults. Psychol. Aging 23, 743–753 (2008).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
von Bastian, C. C., Langer, N., Jäncke, L. & Oberauer, K. Effects of working memory training in young and old adults. Mem. Cogn. 41, 611–624 (2013).
Google Scholar
Turley-Ames, K. Strategy training and working memory task performance. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 446–468 (2003).
Google Scholar
Bailey, H. R., Dunlosky, J. & Hertzog, C. Does strategy training reduce age-related deficits in working memory? Gerontology 60, 346–356 (2014).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hudes, R., Rich, J. B., Troyer, A. K., Yusupov, I. & Vandermorris, S. The impact of memory-strategy training interventions on participant-reported outcomes in healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Aging 34, 587 (2019).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Melby-Lervag, M. & Hulme, C. Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Dev. Psychol. 49, 270–291 (2013).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Redick, T. S. et al. No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142, 359–379 (2013).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Moody, D. Can intelligence be increased by training on a task of working memory? Intelligence 37, 327–328 (2009).
Google Scholar
Sprenger, A. M. et al. Training working memory: limits of transfer. Intelligence 41, 638–663 (2013).
Google Scholar
Thompson, T. W. et al. Failure of working memory training to enhance cognition or intelligence. PLoS ONE 8, e63614 (2013).
PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Risko, E. F., Kelly, M. O., Patel, P. & Gaspar, C. Offloading memory leaves us vulnerable to memory manipulation. Cognition 191, 103954 (2019).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Murphy, D. H. Strategic offloading: how the value of to‐be‐remembered information influences offloading decision‐making. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 37, 4051 (2023).
Google Scholar
Brown, M. Enhancing Short-Term Memory Storage through Cognitive Offloading (California State Univ., Sacramento, 2021).
Hu, X., Luo, L. & Fleming, S. M. A role for metamemory in cognitive offloading. Cognition 193, 104012 (2019).
PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Burnett, L. K. & Richmond, L. L. Beliefs about access to offloaded information at test impacts depth of encoding. 64th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Societyhttpacdn.ymaws.com/www.psychonomic.org/resource/resmgr/annual_meeting/2023_meeting/PS2023_Abstract_Book_Final_1.pdf (2023).
Kelly, M. O. & Risko, E. F. The isolation effect when offloading memory. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cognit. 8, 471–480 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kelly, M. O. & Risko, E. F. Revisiting the influence of offloading memory on free recall. Mem. Cogn. 50, 710–721 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kelly, M. O. & Risko, E. F. Study effort and the memory cost of external store availability. Cognition 228, 105228 (2022).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Grinschgl, S., Papenmeier, F. & Meyerhoff, H. S. Mutual interplay between cognitive offloading and secondary task performance. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 30, 2250–2261 (2023).
PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Richmond, L. L., Kearley, J., Schwartz, S. T. & Hargis, M. B. Take a load off: examining partial and complete cognitive offloading of medication information. Cogn. Res. 8, 12 (2023).
Google Scholar
Storm, B. C. & Stone, S. M. Saving-enhanced memory: the benefits of saving on the learning and remembering of new information. Psychol. Sci. 26, 182–188 (2015).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Runge, Y., Frings, C. & Tempel, T. Specifying the mechanisms behind benefits of saving-enhanced memory. Psychol. Res. 85, 1633–1644 (2021).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Runge, Y., Frings, C. & Tempel, T. Saving-enhanced performance: saving items after study boosts performance in subsequent cognitively demanding tasks. Memory 27, 1462–1467 (2019).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Castel, A. D. in Psychology of Learning and Motivation (eds Benjamin, A. S. & Ross, B. H.) Vol. 48, 225–270 (Elsevier, 2007).
Murphy, D. H. & Castel, A. D. Responsible remembering and forgetting in younger and older adults. Exp. Aging Res. 48, 455–473 (2022).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Burnett, L. K. & Richmond, L. L. Age differences in the use and benefit of partial offloading for recall of valuable information. 65th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Societyhttps://cdn.ymaws.com/www.psychonomic.org/resource/resmgr/annual_meeting/2024_meeting/abstract_book/2024_abstracts_final.pdf (2024).
Roediger, H. L. Recall as a self-limiting process. Mem. Cognit. 6, 54–63 (1978).
Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. Output interference and organized recall from long-term memory. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 10, 400–408 (1971).
Google Scholar
Smith, A. D., D’Agostino, P. R. & Reid, L. S. Output interference in long-term memory. Can. J. Psychol. 24, 85–89 (1970).
Google Scholar
Bäuml, K.-H. & Aslan, A. Part-list cuing as instructed retrieval inhibition. Mem. Cognit. 32, 610–617 (2004).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Slamecka, N. J. An examination of trace storage in free recall. J. Exp. Psychol. 76, 504–513 (1968).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Pepe, N. W., Moyer, A., Peña, T. & Rajaram, S. Deceitful hints: a meta-analytic review of the part-list cuing impairment in recall. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 30, 1243–1272 (2023).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Basden, D. R. & Basden, B. H. Some tests of the strategy disruption interpretation of part-list cuing inhibition. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 21, 1656–1669 (1995).
Google Scholar
Richmond, L. L. et al. Individual differences in prospective and retrospective memory offloading. J. Mem. Lang. 142, 104617 (2025).
Google Scholar
Lu, X., Kelly, M. O. & Risko, E. F. Offloading information to an external store increases false recall. Cognition 205, 104428 (2020).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Epstein, W. in Psychology of Learning and Motivation (ed. Bower, G. H.) vol. 6, 147–191 (Elsevier, 1972).
Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R. & Gargano, G. J. Directed forgetting in implicit and explicit memory tests: a comparison of methods. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 19, 603–616 (1993).
Google Scholar
Zacks, R. T., Radvansky, G. & Hasher, L. Studies of directed forgetting in older adults. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 22, 143–156 (1996).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Knowlton, B. J. & Castel, A. D. Memory and reward-based learning: a value-directed remembering perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 73, 25–52 (2022).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Pereira, A. E., Kelly, M. O., Lu, X. & Risko, E. F. On our susceptibility to external memory store manipulation: examining the influence of perceived reliability and expected access to an external store. Memory 30, 412–428 (2022).
Google Scholar
Deese, J. On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. J. Exp. Psychol. 58, 17–22 (1959).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Roediger, H. L. & McDermott, K. B. Creating false memories: remembering words not presented in lists. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 21, 803–814 (1995).
Google Scholar
Salthouse, T., Atkinson, T. & Berish, D. Executive functioning as a potential mediator of age-related cognitive decline in normal adults. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132, 566–594 (2003).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Cowan, N. The many faces of working memory and short-term storage. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 24, 1158–1170 (2017).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, N., Heitz, R., Schrock, J. & Engle, R. An automated version of the operation span task. Behav. Res. Methods 37, 498–505 (2005).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
West, R. L. & Thorn, R. M. Goal-setting, self-efficacy, and memory performance in older and younger adults. Exp. Aging Res. 27, 41–65 (2001).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Murphy, D. H. & Castel, A. D. Age-related differences in memory when offloading important information. Psychol. Aging 38, 415–427 (2023).
PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Rosen, Z. B. & Botvinick, M. M. Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 139, 665–682 (2010).
PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Kuhns, J. M. & Touron, D. R. Schematic support increases memory strategy use in young and older adults. Psychol. Aging 35, 397–410 (2020).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, S. J. Cognitive offloading is value-based decision making: modelling cognitive effort and the expected value of memory. Cognition 247, 105783 (2024).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Burnett, L. K. & Richmond, L. L. A meta-analytic review of the benefit of using cognitive offloading to perform memory-based tasks. Cognitive Offloading Meeting 2021https://cognitiveoffloading.net/conference2021/programme.pdf (2021).
Armitage, K. L. & Redshaw, J. Children boost their cognitive performance with a novel offloading technique. Child. Dev. 93, 25–38 (2022).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Park, J. S., Kelly, M. O., Hargis, M. B. & Risko, E. F. The effect of external store reliance on actual and predicted value-directed remembering. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 29, 1367–1376 (2022).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Risko, E. F., Kelly, M. O., Lu, X. & Pereira, A. E. in The Remaking of Memory in the Age of the Internet and Social Media (eds Wang, Q. & Hoskins, A.) ch. 5 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2024).
Naveh-Benjamin, M. Adult age differences in memory performance: tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 26, 1170–1187 (2000).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Old, S. R. & Naveh-Benjamin, M. Differential effects of age on item and associative measures of memory: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Aging 23, 104–118 (2008).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hara, Y. & Naveh-Benjamin, M. The role of reduced working memory storage and processing resources in the associative memory deficit of older adults: simulation studies with younger adults. Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 22, 129–154 (2015).
Google Scholar
Spencer, W. D. & Raz, N. Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Aging 10, 527–539 (1995).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Glisky, E. L., Rubin, S. R. & Davidson, P. S. Source memory in older adults: an encoding or retrieval problem? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 27, 1131–1146 (2001).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Henkel, L. A., Johnson, M. K. & De Leonardis, D. M. Aging and source monitoring: cognitive processes and neuropsychological correlates. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 127, 251–268 (1998).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Schacter, D. L., Osowiecki, D., Kaszniak, A. W., Kihlstrom, J. F. & Valdiserri, M. Source memory: extending the boundaries of age-related deficits. Psychol. Aging 9, 81 (1994).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Guynn, M. J. Offloading the components of a prospective memory task. In 61st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society 84 (Psychonomic Society, 2020).
Guynn, M. J., Mcdaniel, M. A. & Einstein, G. O. Prospective memory: when reminders fail. Mem. Cogn. 26, 287–298 (1998).
Google Scholar
Ball, B. H., Wiemers, E. A. & Brewer, G. A. Individual differences in memory and attention processes in prospective remembering. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 29, 922–933 (2022).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Craik, F. I. M. On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. B, Biol. Sci. 302, 341–359 (1983).
Google Scholar
Craik, F. I. M. Reducing age-related memory deficits: the roles of environmental support and self-initiated processing activities. Exp. Aging Res. 48, 401–427 (2022).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Coane, J. H. Retrieval practice and elaborative encoding benefit memory in younger and older adults. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 2, 95–100 (2013).
Google Scholar
Craik, F. I. M. in Human Memory and Cognitive Capabilities (eds Klix, F. & Hagendorf, H.) 409–422 (Elsevier, 1986).
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M. & Ben-Shaul, L. Age-related differences in cued recall: effects of support at encoding and retrieval. Aging, Neuropsychol. Cogn. 9, 276–287 (2002).
Google Scholar
Mair, A., Poirier, M. & Conway, M. A. Supporting older and younger adults’ memory for recent everyday events: a prospective sampling study using SenseCam. Conscious. Cogn. 49, 190–202 (2017).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Mair, A., Poirier, M. & Conway, M. A. Memory for staged events: supporting older and younger adults’ memory with SenseCam. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 72, 717–728 (2019).
Google Scholar
Finley, J. R., Brewer, W. F. & Benjamin, A. S. The effects of end-of-day picture review and a sensor-based picture capture procedure on autobiographical memory using SenseCam. Memory 19, 796–807 (2011).
PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Finley, J. R. & Brewer, W. F. Accuracy and completeness of autobiographical memory: evidence from a wearable camera study. Memory 32, 1012–1042 (2024).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, S., Greene, N. R. & Naveh-Benjamin, M. Age-related differences in recall and recognition: a meta-analysis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 26, 1529–1547 (2019).
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, S. J. Strategic offloading of delayed intentions into the external environment. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 68, 971–992 (2015).
Google Scholar
Download references
Acknowledgements
This Review is based, in part, on data presented during the 2023 J. Don Read Early Career Research Award keynote address presented at the 2023 Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (SARMAC) conference in Nagoya, Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
Lauren L. Richmond & Ryan G. Taylor
Authors
Lauren L. Richmond
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
2. Ryan G. Taylor
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar
Contributions
The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Lauren L. Richmond.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Psychology thanks Kristy Armitage, Sandra Grinschgl and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
About this article
Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark
Cite this article
Richmond, L.L., Taylor, R.G. The benefits and potential costs of cognitive offloading for retrospective information. Nat Rev Psychol (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-025-00432-2
Download citation
Accepted:18 February 2025
Published:17 March 2025
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-025-00432-2
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Get shareable link
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Copy to clipboard
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative