AbstractThis study aimed to evaluate the effect of earthquake preparedness training on the psychological resilience and earthquake preparedness levels of mothers with physically disabled children. The study was conducted at a special education and rehabilitation center in a province in eastern Turkey between January and April 2024, using a pre-test/post-test control group experimental design. A total of 78 mothers participated, with 39 randomly assigned to the experimental group and 39 to the control group. The experimental group received earthquake preparedness training. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. It was determined that 38.5% of the mothers in the experimental group were between 32–39 years of age, equal numbers of primary (35.9%) and secondary (35.9%) school graduates, 84.6% had nuclear families and 89.7% lived in urban areas. In the control group, 38.5% of the mothers were between 25–31 years of age, 33.3% were primary school graduates, 79.5% had nuclear families and 97.4% lived in urban areas. The experimental and control groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics. Before the training, Adult Psychological Resilience Scale (APRS) scores were comparable between groups. After the training, the experimental group showed a significant increase in psychological resilience compared to the control group (p < .05). Similarly, Disaster Preparedness Scale (DPS) scores were comparable before the training, but the experimental group showed a significant increase in earthquake preparedness after the training (p < .05). The training enhanced both psychological resilience and earthquake preparedness in mothers, increasing their knowledge and awareness about earthquakes. Developing earthquake preparedness training and materials specifically for families with physically disabled children will contribute to the safety and well-being of both families and their children.
IntroductionEarthquakes are among the most destructive and deadly natural disasters worldwide1,2. While earthquakes have economic, physical, social, and psychological impacts on the general population, research indicates that disadvantaged groups, such as children and individuals with special needs, are disproportionately affected3,4,5. Around 7 million children with disabilities are affected by disasters worldwide every year. Their special physical, psychological and health needs make them vulnerable to negative impacts during a disaster, such as delayed evacuation and lack of social support systems6. Individuals with special needs often encounter multiple barriers during emergency response and recovery efforts, which exacerbate the challenges they face. Studies show that during earthquakes, these individuals struggle to access basic necessities such as electricity, clean water, and healthcare services5,7. Specifically, children with physical disabilities and their families are reported to be three times more likely to face difficulties in obtaining medical assistance during and immediately after a disaster7,8.Disability is defined as having a long-term and limiting illness, disability or impairment, as self-reported by the individual, unless otherwise specified. The global prevalence of disability increases with age, from 5.8% in children and adolescents aged 0–14 years to 34.4% in adults aged 60 years and over9. In Turkey, in the report published by the Ministry of Family and Social Services (ASHB), it was reported that 33,185 children aged 0–4, 91,059 children aged 5–9, 122,807 children aged 10–14 and 134,078 children aged 15–19 were disabled10. These data show that a total of 381,129 children in Turkey have disabilities. In addition, in the Turkey Health Survey 2022 report published by the Turkish Statistical Institute (TÜİK), it is stated that 1.5% of children between the ages of 2–14 have difficulty walking11.Parenting a child with a disability imposes various burdens on families, including economic challenges, educational needs, health issues, social exclusion, and care demands associated with the child’s condition12. Numerous studies have reported that parents of children with disabilities experience heightened levels of stress, anxiety, frustration, and loneliness13,14,15,16. These challenges have been shown to negatively impact the psychological resilience of parents in families with disabled children17,18. Psychological resilience enables people to cope better during disasters and accelerate their post-disaster recovery processes. In this context, trainings to enhance psychological resilience have been shown to improve stress coping strategies and strengthen the ability to respond more adaptively during disasters. It is also emphasized that psychological preparedness promotes long-term psychological recovery and resilience by enabling better response to stressful disaster-related stimuli19.Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (AFAD), Search and Rescue Association (AKUT), local governments and non-governmental organizations organize trainings and prepare various publications for disaster preparedness for individuals with disabilities. As a part of teamwork, healthcare personnel contribute to the disaster preparedness, protection, treatment and rehabilitation processes of persons with disabilities20. Guides and training materials for persons with disabilities were prepared within the scope of the reports prepared by AFAD21,22. However, these guides are generally part of general disaster management practices and are not defined as a disability-specific model. Some local governments have developed special projects aiming to protect persons with disabilities in disasters. For example, it is aimed to provide accessibility standards for persons with disabilities in disaster assembly areas22.Despite the significant body of research on the effects of earthquakes on the general population, studies focusing on the specific impact of earthquakes on children with physical disabilities and their families are limited23,24. It was stated that earthquake preparedness training given to hearing impaired children helped to improve their preparedness for earthquakes and created earthquake awareness6. Additionally, research has indicated that families with disabled children tend to have low levels of disaster preparedness, and there is a need to raise their awareness and support them through targeted training programs24,25,26. In a phenomenological study, it was stated that the majority of the parents of individuals with intellectual disabilities pointed out that they did not have adequate preparations for the earthquake, they could not meet many of their needs during and after the earthquake, and they could not find a special unit where they could tell their problems to the disabled individuals27. Türk24 emphasized the importance of developing holistic disaster management models that include specialized training and programs for individuals with disabilities. In this context, it is crucial to increase awareness among mothers of children with physical disabilities about how to prepare for earthquakes and how to cope during such disasters. In addition, it is thought that this research will have an important place in the literature in terms of providing a basis for new ideas in the development of intervention strategies by paving the way for studies to be conducted in other disabled groups.The aim of this study is to enhance the earthquake preparedness of mothers of children with physical disabilities through targeted training, while also improving their psychological resilience. Additionally, the study aims to evaluate the impact of this training on their levels of earthquake preparedness and psychological resilience.H1: Earthquake preparedness training improves the psychological resilience of mothers of children with physical disabilities.H2: Earthquake preparedness training improves the earthquake preparedness levels of mothers of children with physical disabilities.ResultsComparison of the characteristics of the mothers in the experimental and control groupsIn the experimental group, 38.5% of mothers were aged 32–39. Education levels were equal among primary (35.9%) and secondary (35.9%) school graduates. Most mothers (84.6%) lived in nuclear families, and 61.5% reported incomes lower than their expenses. Additionally, 92.3% were unemployed, 89.7% resided in urban areas, 43.6% had three or more children, 53.8% were not related to their spouses, 74.4% did not have chronic diseases, and 69.2% had no other disabled individuals in their families. Upon learning of their child’s physical disability, 56.4% experienced shock, 71.8% reported life changes, 50% faced restrictions, 76.9% had no marital issues due to the disability, and 97.4% engaged in various activities with their disabled child. Regarding earthquake preparedness, 94.9% had earthquake experience, 53.8% knew how to protect themselves and their children, 56.4% lacked earthquake preparation, 56.7% of those prepared maintained an emergency kit and first aid supplies, and 71.8% had not received earthquake training (Table 1).Table 1 Comparison of the descriptive characteristics of the mothers between the groups.Full size tableIn the control group, 38.5% of mothers were aged 25–31, and 33.3% were primary school graduates. Most (79.5%) lived in nuclear families, and 62.2% reported incomes equivalent to their expenses. Moreover, 94.9% were unemployed, 97.4% lived in urban areas, and there were equal numbers of mothers with two (43.6%) and three or more children (43.6%). Additionally, 64.1% were not related to their spouses, 74.4% had no chronic diseases, and 82.1% had no other disabled individuals in their families. In response to their child’s physical disability, 48.7% felt shock, 74.4% experienced life changes, 50% faced restrictions, and 74.4% reported no marital issues due to the disability. All mothers engaged in various activities with their disabled child. Regarding earthquake preparedness, 92.3% had earthquake experience, 61.5% knew how to protect themselves and their children, 66.7% lacked earthquake preparation, and 61.5% had not received earthquake training (Table 1).When comparing the descriptive characteristics of mothers in the experimental and control groups, all characteristics except income status were similar, with no statistically significant differences observed between the groups (p > 0.05, Table 1).Comparison of the characteristics of children in the experimental and control groupsIt was found that 38.5% of the children of mothers in the experimental group were aged 11–18, 84.6% did not have any other chronic diseases, and 53.8% had congenital physical disabilities. In the control group, 30.8% of the children were aged 11–18, 76.9% did not have any other chronic diseases, and 79.5% had congenital physical disabilities. No statistically significant differences were observed between the experimental and control groups regarding other characteristics, except for congenital physical disability (Table 2).Table 2 Comparison of descriptive characteristics of children between groups.Full size tableComparison of psychological resilience and earthquake readiness levels according to pre-post intervention and experimental—control groupsA statistically significant difference was observed between the pretest mean of the APRS (74.1 ± 9.1) and the posttest mean (77.2 ± 9.1) prior to the intervention (t = -7.005, p < 0.05). Furthermore, while there was no significant difference between the groups before the intervention (p > 0.05), a significant difference emerged between the experimental and control groups after the intervention (t = 2.321, p < 0.05). Similarly, a significant difference was noted between the pretest mean of the DPS (31.8 ± 7.6) and the posttest mean (35.8 ± 7.9) (p < 0.05). Although no significant difference existed between the groups before the intervention (p > 0.05), a significant difference was found between the experimental and control groups after the intervention (t = 6.156, p < 0.05). Significant differences were also observed between the groups on the DPP, P, DA, and AWS subscales of the DPS following the intervention (p < 0.05, Table 3, Fig. 1).Table 3 Comparison of psychological resilience and earthquake preparedness and their sub-dimensions according to pre-post intervention and experimental-control groups.Full size tableFig. 1Graphical representation of the comparison of psychological resilience and earthquake preparedness and their sub-dimensions according to pre-post intervention and experimental-control groups (APRS: Adult Psychological Resilience Scale; DPS: Disaster Preparedness Scale; DPP: Disaster Physical Protection; P: Planning; DA: Disaster Assistance; DWS: Disaster Warning and Signals; *: p < 0.05).Full size imageDiscussionIn this study, it was aimed to evaluate the psychological resilience and earthquake preparedness levels with earthquake preparedness training given to mothers of children with physical disabilities. For this purpose, earthquake preparedness and psychological resilience levels were evaluated.Having children with physical disabilities is a challenging process for all family members. Families with such children face various psychological conditions, including difficulties, stress, and fear. Research has indicated that the level of psychological resilience among parents of children with disabilities is low due to the challenges they experience28,29. Additionally, it has been reported that the level of disaster preparedness in families with children with disabilities is also low, highlighting the need for increased awareness and support through training25,26.In this study, which aimed to enhance psychological resilience and earthquake awareness among mothers of children with physical disabilities by providing earthquake preparedness training, it was determined that the training positively affected both psychological resilience and earthquake preparedness levels in the mothers. These results supported the hypothesis: “Earthquake preparedness training for mothers of children with physical disabilities affects their level of psychological resilience.” As no studies evaluating the effects of disaster preparedness training on psychological resilience were found in the literature, the findings were discussed in relation to studies examining the effectiveness of various training types on psychological resilience.When evaluating the APRS pre-test data, no statistically significant difference was found between the experimental and control groups; however, there was a statistically significant difference in favor of the experimental group in the post-test data (p < 0.05). Additionally, it was found that the earthquake preparedness training increased the post-test APRS score average within the experimental group, and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05, d = 0.692, medium effect size, Table 3). Psychological resilience is defined as an individual’s capacity to cope with stressful and challenging situations and to adapt to life in a healthy manner30,31,32. Studies have shown that families with children with disabilities exhibit lower levels of psychological resilience due to stress, fear, anxiety, and physical challenges compared to families without such children33,34,35. In this context, various interventions, such as art activities36, emotional intelligence training37, cognitive-behavioral approaches38, and mindfulness-based self-compassion training39, have been reported to enhance the psychological resilience of parents with special needs children. It is known that the difficulties experienced by families with children with disabilities after earthquakes due to reasons such as access to health care and meeting basic needs negatively affect their psychological resilience5,19. Earthquake preparedness training provided to mothers with children with physical disabilities increases both individual and family psychological resilience by providing skills such as composure, planning and solution-orientedness in times of crisis, increases their effectiveness in ensuring the safety of individuals with disabilities, strengthens family solidarity and contributes to the spread of social awareness through learning from traumatic experiences. It should also be kept in mind that these processes have implementation challenges such as socio-economic level, lack of social support, special needs of the child with disabilities and accessibility to education.The second hypothesis of the study posited that “Earthquake preparedness training for mothers of children with physical disabilities affects their level of earthquake preparedness.” Disaster preparedness is defined as the measures taken to prepare society by developing response and recovery plans to mitigate the impact of disasters, ensuring effective implementation of these plans, and maintaining continuous public awareness40,41. Some literature suggests that individuals with special needs have inadequate knowledge about disaster preparedness and that more training is necessary for them and their families in disaster management26,42,43.When the DPS pre-test data were evaluated, no statistically significant difference was observed between the experimental and control groups, whereas a statistically significant difference in favor of the experimental group was found in the post-test data (p < 0.05). Furthermore, it was determined that the earthquake preparedness training provided to the mothers in the experimental group significantly increased the post-test DPS score average within the group (p < 0.05, d = 0.960, large effect size, Table 3). Toor, et al.44 reported that individualized disaster education helps families with children dependent on parenteral nutrition not only to prepare for potential earthquakes but also to become more confident in coping with any disaster. Similarly, Bagwell, et al.45 found that educational disaster materials for parents of children with special needs raised awareness and increased knowledge about disaster preparedness. Baker, et al.46 noted that disaster preparedness training using brochures improved the disaster preparedness of families with children with special needs. These findings support existing literature and suggest that training can enhance disaster awareness among parents and guide their planning for their children. It has been stated that awareness of disasters can be temporarily increased by an intervention, but such a level is difficult to sustain in the long term and tends to return to its original state after one month47. B This suggests that awareness-raising efforts should be supported by reinforcement strategies focused on continuity, repetition, and practice.Physical protection measures, first aid training, and disaster planning during the earthquake preparation phase are vital for both the moment of the earthquake and the aftermath. Key components of disaster risk management include preparing emergency bags, securing non-structural elements, ensuring the earthquake resistance of buildings, and evacuation planning24,48,49. A study by Bilik and Akdağ5 discussed the challenges faced by mothers of children with special needs during disasters, revealing that their pre-earthquake preparations were inadequate, and they encountered difficulties during the evacuation process, as well as deficiencies in planning and meeting basic life needs.In the DPS sub-dimensions, the DPP, P, DA, and DWS scores of the experimental and control groups were similar before the intervention; however, a statistical difference was observed in the experimental group in the post-test results (p < 0.05). It was determined that the training provided to the experimental group significantly impacted the changes in the post-test DPP, P, DA, and DWS total scores (p < 0.05). Analysis of the effect sizes for the sub-dimensions showed that DPP (d = 0.237), P (d = 0.159), and DA (d = 0.073) had small effect sizes, while DWS (d = 2.990) exhibited a high effect size (Table 3). A statistically significant difference in DPP, P, DA, and DWS scores was reported for individuals who received disaster-related training compared to those who did not50. In a study conducted with university students, it was found that students who received disaster training had higher DPP, P, DA, and DWS scores than those who did not51. Additionally, it was reported that the disaster preparedness of individuals who received first aid training was superior to those who did not, with higher awareness of physical protection, planning, and first aid52. The increases in DPP, P, DA, and DWS sub-dimension scores observed in this training are consistent with existing literature, suggesting that the awareness generated by the training content contributed to these improvements.Integration of disability-specific interventions and strategies into the disaster management model can contribute to the protection of both the disabled individual and his/her family from earthquakes and other disasters. However, this can only be possible with the development of national and international perspectives. As a matter of fact, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015—2030 report published by the United Nations (UN) provides a guide by exhibiting transformational leadership on the effective inclusion of persons with disabilities in disaster management53. For the success of this process, the UN needs to develop a comprehensive strategy supported by scientific and interdisciplinary data and work in transparency and harmony by establishing effective partnerships with international Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and local communities54.Strengths and limitations of the studyOne of the strengths of the study is that it is the first study to evaluate the effect of earthquake preparedness training on families with physically disabled children. This situation is thought to be a guide for future studies. In addition, the training raised awareness about earthquake preparedness in mothers of children with physical disabilities and increased their psychological resilience. In this context, it was emphasized that vulnerable groups should be taken into consideration in the literature. In addition, the evaluation and analysis of the effectiveness of the training by an expert statistician is one of the strengths of the study. Since the study was experimental, conducted in a single center and the number of participants was insufficient, the 0–18 age group was included and this constituted the limitation of the study. In addition, the age range of the children of the mothers included in the sample varied between 0–18 years and the results were not analyzed stratified by age.ConclusionIn the study evaluating the effect of earthquake preparedness training on the psychological resilience and earthquake preparedness levels of mothers with physically disabled children, it was found that both psychological resilience and earthquake preparedness levels increased following the training.Disaster physical protection training was found to be effective and increased the level of knowledge, attitudes and behaviors about disaster planning, first aid, warnings and signals. In this context, health service providers (nurses, physicians, emergency response teams, etc.) should play an active role in trainings for families of children with physical disabilities. Especially pediatric nurses should prepare families with children with disabilities for earthquakes and other disasters by fulfilling their roles and responsibilities such as advocacy, counseling, educating, rehabilitating and comforting. They should take responsibility for improving the quality of post-disaster services by providing support to increase the psychological resilience of parents against disasters. In addition, it is important to develop materials and resources by healthcare providers to make trainings accessible and continuous.Policy makers should make the necessary legal arrangements to increase community-wide awareness about disaster preparedness and the psychological support services that develop accordingly. Policies can be developed to address the educational needs of families with physically disabled children and these trainings can be made widespread. Ensuring that training materials and resources are accessible increases effective intervention during a disaster. In addition, identification of families of children with disabilities, implementation of trainings, provision of necessary psychological support before, during and after the earthquake should be realized within the scope of family support services.Rehabilitation centers should provide trainings to support the disaster preparedness of children with physical disabilities and their families. These trainings can help families become sensitive to disasters and take special measures to address the needs of children with disabilities. In addition, it is important that rehabilitation centers contribute to increasing the psychological resilience of families by providing post-disaster psychological support services.Family Support Services should help families with children with physical disabilities gain the necessary knowledge and skills to be prepared for disasters. Regular trainings and drills for families can improve their quality of life after disasters. Training materials and guides should be made continuously available to ensure that families are prepared for disasters. In addition, family support services can contribute to post-disaster coping processes by offering psychological support programs to increase the psychological resilience of families.This study filled an important gap in the literature in terms of raising awareness about how mothers of children with physical disabilities should prepare for earthquakes, how they should cope with earthquakes, and providing a basis for new ideas in the development of intervention strategies by paving the way for studies to be conducted in other disabled groups. In addition, it is recommended to conduct studies on the subject in larger samples, specific and age groups.Financial supportNo financial support was received from any institution, organisation or individual.Subjects and methodsDesignThe study was conducted as experimental (pretest–posttest control group). The study was registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov Registry in 08/11/2023 (registration number: NCT06122350). First trial registration of date 15/02/2024. The CONSORT diagram of the study is shown in Fig. 2.Fig. 2CONSORT diagram of the study.Full size imagePlace and timeThe study was conducted at a special education and rehabilitation center under the Directorate of National Education in a province in eastern Turkey. Data were collected between January 2024 and April 2024 from mothers of children with physical disabilities who met the inclusion criteria.Sample and populationThe study was designed as a randomized controlled trial with two groups: an “Experimental Group” and a "Control Group," to determine the effect of earthquake preparedness training provided to mothers of children with physical disabilities on psychological resilience and earthquake preparedness levels. The research sample was composed of mothers since most of the care responsibilities of children with disabilities are undertaken by mothers55,56. It was identified that there were 56 special education and rehabilitation centers in the province where the research was conducted. The mothers of 2,688 children with physical disabilities in these institutions constituted the study population. After contacting the institutions, it was determined that six centers met the sampling criteria based on the number of children receiving ongoing education and treatment. The rehabilitation center for data collection was selected through a lottery method.The study’s power was calculated using the G*Power 3.1.9.4 application57. Based on the Power analysis, with an effect size of Δ 74 derived from a reference study36, a power of 0.80, and alpha levels of α 0.05 and β 0.20, it was found that a sample size of 60 mothers (30 in each group: Experimental and Control) would be sufficient. Data collection was ultimately completed with 78 mothers.Inclusion and exclusion criteriaInclusion criteria
Mothers of physically disabled children aged 0–18,
Ability to communicate effectively,
No diagnosed psychiatric illness or disability,
Child currently receiving rehabilitation services.
Exclusion criteria
Mothers who do not have a physically disabled child,
Those who are closed to communication,
Those who do not accept voluntary participation,
Mothers who have any chronic or psychiatric illness.
Data collection toolsThe data were collected using two forms: the Mother Introductory Information Form (MIFF), consisting of 23 questions, and the Child Introductory Information Form (CIIF), consisting of 3 questions. Both forms were designed based on the literature to assess socio-demographic characteristics. Additionally, two scales were used as data collection tools: the Adult Psychological Resilience Scale (APRS), comprising 21 questions, and the Disaster Preparedness Scale (DPS), consisting of 15 questions.Mother introductory information form (MIFF)This form was developed based on the literature and includes 23 questions assessing socio-demographic characteristics such as age, gender, income status, chronic disease status, number of children, and the family’s place of residence6,48,49,58.Child introductory information form (CIIF)Developed using the literature, this form consists of 3 questions aimed at identifying child-related characteristics, including age and chronic disease status59,60.Adult psychological resilience scale (APRS)The APRS consists of 21 items and uses a five-point Likert scale, ranging from “Completely describes me (5)” to “Does not describe me at all (1)." Higher scores reflect greater psychological resilience. The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale were established by Arslan (2015) with a sample of 470 participants aged 21–48. The Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.94. The validity and reliability results indicated that the scale is suitable for assessing psychological resilience in adults in Turkey61. In this study, the Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient was 0.81 for the pre-test and 0.82 for the post-test.Disaster preparedness scale (DPS)The Disaster Preparedness Scale, developed by Şentuna and Çakı41, was utilized in this study. The scale consists of 15 items and is divided into four sub-dimensions: Disaster Physical Protection (DPP), Planning (P), Disaster Assistance (DA), and Disaster Warning and Signals (DWS). The Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient for the overall scale was reported as 0.82, indicating good reliability. In this study, the Cronbach’s Alpha values for the DPS were 0.87 in both the pre-test and post-test phases, confirming the scale’s reliability in this context.Training bookletThe training booklet, Earthquake Preparedness Guide for Families with Physically Disabled Children, was developed using resources from the literature, the Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (AFAD), and the Search and Rescue Association (AKUT). The content of the booklet was structured according to the disaster risk management model, incorporating visuals to support practices before, during, and after an earthquake. The pre-earthquake training includes topics such as communication with local authorities, structural safety of buildings, securing hazardous items, creating a safe area for children with physical disabilities, evacuation and communication plans, safeguarding important documents (e.g., policies, passports, ID cards, title deeds), and earthquake and first aid training for family members. During an earthquake, the training emphasizes remaining calm, moving to a safe area, adopting the correct protective position, staying away from doors, windows, and elevators, and being mindful of fire hazards. After the earthquake, it includes advice on keeping calm, assessing hazards, using telephones only for emergencies, following authorities’ instructions, gathering in designated areas, providing first aid, and ensuring safety5,21,22,24,45,46,48,62,63,64.Application of data collection toolsData were collected by the psychological counseling and guidance teacher at the rehabilitation center through face-to-face interviews, each lasting 10–15 min. The MIFF, CIIF, APRS, and DPS assessments were used for pretests. After administering the pretests, each mother was assigned a unique identification number. To reduce selection bias and control for variables that might affect the outcome measures, mothers were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The assignment was conducted using a simple randomization method via Random Allocation Software (İsfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran).The researcher interviewed each mother in the experimental group (n = 39) and provided earthquake preparedness training lasting 25–30 min. This training was conducted face-to-face in a question-and-answer format and utilized the “Earthquake Preparedness Guide for Families with Physically Disabled Children.” At the conclusion of the training, participants received the training materials and were encouraged to read them. Additionally, mothers were given a contact number and informed that they could reach out with any questions.To ensure that mothers in the control group were unaware of the training, only the experimental group received this intervention, facilitated by the teacher in charge at the rehabilitation center. Reinforcement training sessions were conducted four times in total, with visits to the rehabilitation center every two weeks. At the end of the eight-week period, post-tests were administered to both the experimental and control groups by the psychological counseling and guidance teacher at the rehabilitation center, using the APRS and DPS assessments.After completing the post-tests, earthquake preparedness training was provided to the control group, and the study concluded with the distribution of educational materials to all mothers. No data loss occurred during the research process, and complete data were collected from all participating mothers.Data evaluationAlthough the researcher was aware of the group assignments of the mothers, third-party blinding was ensured by arranging the data so that it was not possible to determine the group affiliation. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0. Basic descriptive statistics included sample size (n), percentage (%), mean (x̄), standard deviation (SD), and maximum and minimum values. For cross-tabular analyses, Pearson Chi-Square was employed when the expected frequency in the cells was greater than 5, while Fisher’s Exact Test (FET) was used when the expected frequency was 5 or fewer. In comparisons of independent groups, a t-test was conducted if parametric conditions were met; otherwise, the Mann–Whitney U test was used. For dependent groups, a t-test was applied when parametric conditions were met, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used when they were not. The reliability of the scales was assessed using Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient (α). A significance level of p < 0.05 was accepted for all comparison tests. Effect size was evaluated using Cohen’s d, with values interpreted as follows: < 0.2 indicates a weak effect, 0.2–0.5 indicates a small effect, 0.5–0.8 indicates a moderate effect, and > 0.8 indicates a large effect size.Ethical approachEthical approval was obtained from the Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (dated 14.07.2023 and numbered 2023/07–15) for the study to be conducted. Later, a study permit was obtained from the provincial Directorate of National Education (dated 06.12.2023 and numbered 91,449,811). The principles of the World Medical Association (WMA) Declaration of Helsinki were adhered to during the research process. Mothers were informed about the purpose of the study (Informed Consent Principle). After written and verbal informed consent was obtained from the mothers, they were informed that they could withdraw from the study at any time (Respect for Autonomy Principle). In addition, mothers were informed that personal information would not be collected and that their participation in the study would be carried out within the framework of the principle of confidentiality.
Data availability
The data that support the fndings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
ReferencesCanpolat, N., Saygili, S. & Sever, L. Earthquake in Turkey: Disasters and children. Turk. Arch. Pediatr. 58, 119–121. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2023.160222 (2023).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
MATH
Google Scholar
Ergen, E. et al. Which is more dangerous, earthquake, or the panic?Evaluation of the 24 January 2020 Elazig/Turkiye earthquake related musculoskeletal injuries. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 28, 1335–1339. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.57606 (2022).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
MATH
Google Scholar
Yildiz, A., Dickinson, J., Priego-Hernandez, J. & Teeuw, R. Children’s disaster knowledge, risk perceptions, and preparedness: A cross-country comparison in Nepal and Turkey. Risk Anal. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13937 (2022).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Ge, F., Wan, M. & Zhang, J. Patterns of depression and resilience in children and adolescents exposed to an earthquake: A latent profile analysis. Psychiatry Investig. 18, 580–588. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2020.0330 (2021).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
MATH
Google Scholar
Bilik, M. B. & Akdağ, M. Özel gereksinimli bireyler ve ebeveynleri açisindan afet zorlukları: 2011 Van Depremi Örneği. Afet ve Risk Dergisi 6, 243–256. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1233201 (2023).Article
Google Scholar
Wang, L. et al. Earthquake disaster preparedness training programme for hearing-impaired children: a randomized quasi-experimental trial. Int. J. Disaster Risk Red. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103716 (2023).Article
Google Scholar
Lindsay, S. & Hsu, S. Emergency and disaster preparedness among children and youth with disabilities and chronic conditions, their caregivers and service providers: a scoping review. Disabil. Rehabil. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2185294 (2023).Article
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Phibbs, S., Good, G., Severinsen, C., Woodbury, E. & Williamson, K. What about us? reported experiences of disabled people related to the christchurch earthquakes. Procedia Econ. Fin. 18, 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00930-7 (2014).Article
Google Scholar
WHO. Global report on health equity for persons with disabilities. (2022).ASHB. Engelli ve Yaşlı İstatistik Bülteni,
Google Scholar
Caynak, S., Ozer, Z. & Keser, I. Stigma for disabled individuals and their family: A systematic review. Perspect. Psychiatr. Care 58, 1190–1199. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12893 (2022).Article
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Russell, M. J., Zhang, Y., Cui, X., Tough, S. & Zwicker, J. D. Use of family disability service by families with young children with disabilities. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 63, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14478 (2021).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hsieh, W. H., Lee, W. C. & Hsieh, R. L. Effects of a family-centered workshop for children with developmental delays. Medicine (Baltimore) 97, e12106. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012106 (2018).Article
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Roddy, A. Income and conversion handicaps: estimating the impact of child chronic illness/disability on family income and the extra cost of child chronic illness/child disability in Ireland using a standard of living approach. Eur. J. Health Econ. 23, 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01371-4 (2022).Article
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Gavidia-payne, S., Denny, B., Davis, K., Francis, A. & Jackson, M. Parental resilience: A neglected construct in resilience research. Clin. Psychologist 19, 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/cp.12053 (2020).Article
Google Scholar
Black, K. & Lobo, M. A conceptual review of family resilience factors. J. Fam. Nurs. 14, 33–55 (2008).PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Zulch, H. 2019 Psychological preparedness for natural hazards–improving disaster preparedness policy and practice. United Nations Off Disaster Risk Reduct, 1–43Arslan, K. in Sosyal Bilimler Üzerine Araştırmalar-II 197–209 Özgür Yayın Dağıtım Ltd. Şti. (2023).AFAD. Fiziksel Engelliler için Depreme Hazırlık,
MATH
Google Scholar
Türk, A. Deprem özelinde engelli bireylere duyarli afet yönetimi modeli. Afet ve Risk Dergisi 5, 61–77. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1078869 (2022).Article
Google Scholar
Hipper, T. J. et al. The disaster information needs of families of children with special healthcare needs: A scoping review. Health Secur. 16, 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2018.0007 (2018).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pakalın, B. & Mersin, F. Depreme hazırlar mı? Özel Gereksinimli Bireylerin Deprem Anında Güvenliği. İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 8, 795–802 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yarımkaya, E. & Bakkaloğlu, H. Experiences of parents of individuals with intellectual disabilities after the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes in Türkiye: A phenomenological study. Int. J. Dev. Disabil. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2024.2363009 (2024).Article
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Bitsika, V., Sharpley, C. F. & Bell, R. The buffering effect of resilience upon stress, anxiety and depression in parents of a child with an autism spectrum disorder. J. Dev. Phys. Disabil. 25, 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-013-9333-5 (2013).Article
Google Scholar
Söylev, Ö. F. & Öztürk, C. K. Özel Gereksinimli Çocuğu Olan Ailelerin Psikolojik Sağlamlığı ile Maneviyat İlişkisi. Turk. Acad. Res. Rev. 7, 373–394 (2016).
Google Scholar
Akoğlu, B. Özel Gereksinimi Olan Çocuğa Sahip Ailelerde Psikolojik Sağlamlık Üzerine Sistematik Bir Derleme. Mutluluk ve İyi Oluş Dergisi 7, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.32739/usmut.2022.7.13.11 (2022).Article
Google Scholar
Denckla, C. A. et al. Psychological resilience: An update on definitions, a critical appraisal, and research recommendations. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol. 11, 1822064. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1822064 (2020).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. R. et al. Resilience and psychosocial outcomes in parents of children with cancer. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 61, 552–557. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.24854 (2014).Article
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Fereidouni, Z. et al. A comparative study on the quality of life and resilience of mothers with disabled and neurotypically developing children in Iran. Heliyon 7, e07285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07285 (2021).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Tura, G. Engelli çocuğu olan ve çocuğu engelli olmayan annelerin anksiyete, depresyon ve psikolojik sağlamlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 18, 30–36 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sarıçam, H., Deveci, M. & Ahmetoğlu, E. The examination of hope, intolerance of uncertainty and resilience levels in parents having disabled children. Glob. J. Psychol. Res.: New Trends Issues 10, 118–131 (2020).MATH
Google Scholar
Culhacik, G. D., Durat, G. & Eren, N. Effects of activity groups, in which art activities are used, on resilience and related factors in families with disabled children. Perspect. Psychiatr. Care 57, 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12569 (2021).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Herisi, S. A., Agdasi, A. N. & Hoseininasab, S. D. Effectiveness of emotional intelligence training on resilience of parents with abnormal children in Tehran. Int. J. Health Sci. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.8187 (2022).Article
Google Scholar
Ülken, E. & Odacı, H. Tek Ebeveyn Annelere Yönelik Psikolojik Sağlamlığı Geliştirme Psiko-Eğitim Programı. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet 35, 227–251. https://doi.org/10.33417/tsh.1287235 (2024).Article
Google Scholar
Cengiz, M. Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu Olan Çocukların Ebeveynlerine Yönelik Verilen Farkındalık Temelli Öz Şefkat Eğitiminin Stres, Psikolojik Dayanıklılık ve İyi Oluş Üzerine Etkisi Doktora Tezi thesis, Atatürk Üniversitesi, (2024).Raneses, M. K., Chang-Richards, A., Richards, J. & Bubb, J. Measuring the level of disaster preparedness in Auckland. Procedia Eng. 212, 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.054 (2018).Article
MATH
Google Scholar
Şentuna, B. & Çakı, F. Balıkesir Örnekleminde Bir Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması: Afet Hazırbulunuşluk Ölçeği. İdealkent 11, 1959–1983. https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.728896 (2020).Article
Google Scholar
Gür, B. S. & Kurt, T. Türkiye’de ailelerin eğitim ihtiyaçları. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi 27, 27 (2011).
Google Scholar
Tanaka, S. Issues in the support and disaster preparedness of severely disabled children in affected areas. Brain Dev. 35, 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.braindev.2012.09.008 (2013).Article
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Toor, K. T. et al. Improving disaster preparedness of families with a parenteral nutrition-dependent child. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 67, 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002048 (2018).Article
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Bagwell, H. B. et al. Disaster preparedness in families with children with special health care needs. Clin. Pediatr. (Phila) 55, 1036–1043. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922816665087 (2016).Article
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Baker, M. D., Baker, L. R. & Flagg, L. A. Preparing families of children with special health care needs for disasters: An education intervention. Soc. Work Health Care 51, 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2012.659837 (2012).Article
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Yasuda, M., Muramoto, T. & Nouchi, R. Assessment of educational methods for improving children’s awareness of tsunamis and other natural disasters: Focusing on changes in awareness and regional characteristics in Japan. Geosciences https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8020047 (2018).Article
Google Scholar
Şahin, Ş. Türkiye’de afet yönetimi ve 2023 hedefleri. Türk Deprem Araştırma Dergisi 1, 180–196 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hamann, C. J. et al. Disaster preparedness in rural families of children with special health care needs. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 10, 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2015.159 (2016).Article
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Tercan, B. Afete Dirençlilikte Bireylerin Afetlere Hazırlığının İncelenmesi: Erzincan İli Örneği. Afet ve Risk Dergisi 5, 261–269. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1063790 (2022).Article
Google Scholar
Çelik, İH. A research on vocational school students within the framework of disaster awareness and disaster preparedness levels. Afet ve Risk Dergisi 6, 852–869. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1236274 (2023).Article
MATH
Google Scholar
Demirci, C. İlk Yardım Eğitimi Alan Bireylerin İlk Yardım Becerileri ve Afet Hazırbulunuşluk Düzeyleri. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 1, 92–101 (2023).
Google Scholar
UN. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. (Sendai, Japan, 2015).Jang, J. H. & Ha, K. M. Inclusion of children with disabilities in disaster management. Children (Basel) https://doi.org/10.3390/children8070581 (2021).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
MATH
Google Scholar
Ören, B. & Aydin, R. Engelli Çocuğa Sahip Ebeveynlerde Bakım Veren Yükü ve Depresyon Durumlarının İncelenmesi. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 7, 302–309. https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.682392 (2020).Article
Google Scholar
Yildirim, M., Düken, M. E., Suna Dağ, Y. & Yayan, E. H. Serebral Palsili Çocuğa Sahip Anne ve Babaların Bakım Yüklerinin Karşılaştırılması. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.605646 (2020).Article
Google Scholar
Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A. & Lang, A. G. Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1. Behav. Res. Methods 41, 1149–1160 (2009).
Google Scholar
Stough, L. M. World report on disability, intellectual disabilities, and disaster preparedness: Costa rica as a case example. J. Policy Pract. Intel. Disabil. 12, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12116 (2015).Article
Google Scholar
Balcı, S. Determining the difficulties faced by families with intellectual disability children and the burden on the family. J. Psych. Nurs. https://doi.org/10.14744/phd.2018.05657 (2018).Article
MATH
Google Scholar
Kandel, I. & Merrick, J. The child with a disability: parental acceptance, management and coping. Sci. World J. 7, 1799–1809. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2007.265 (2007).Article
MATH
Google Scholar
Arslan, G. Yetişkin Psikolojik Sağlamlık Ölçeği’nin (YPSÖ) psikometrik özellikleri: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Ege Eğitim Dergisi 16, 344–357 (2015).
Google Scholar
AFAD. Engelliler için Depremde İlk 72 Saat,
Abdullah Adıyaman or Veysel Can.Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional informationPublisher’s noteSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Reprints and permissionsAbout this articleCite this articleAdıyaman, A., Can, V. & Sarman, A. The impact of earthquake preparedness training on mothers with physically disabled children: a randomized controlled study.
Sci Rep 15, 9554 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94426-yDownload citationReceived: 14 October 2024Accepted: 13 March 2025Published: 20 March 2025DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94426-yShare this articleAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Get shareable linkSorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.Copy to clipboard
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
KeywordsEarthquakeMothersPhysically disabled childrenPreparednessPsychological resilienceTraining