AbstractShock waves are widely used to treat various diseases and have numerous medical applications. In particular, extracorporeal shock waves (ESV) can substantially inhibit tumour growth. However, the therapeutic efficacy of ESV in colorectal cancer and its underlying mechanisms are not well understood. To address this gap in our knowledge, colorectal cancer cell lines HT29 and SW620 were used to generate xenograft mouse models and examined the therapeutic effects of a stepwise increase in ESV energy on tumour growth. In vivo, 60 mJ ESV significantly delayed xenograft growth compared with 120 and 240 mJ ESV, with no impact on body weight or hepatic and renal function. Transcriptome analysis revealed that 60 mJ ESV suppressed colorectal cancer cell proliferation and induced apoptosis and ferroptosis; these findings were further confirmed by immunohistochemical staining and western blotting. The in vitro study showed that ESV mechanistically suppressed cell proliferation and induced apoptosis and ferroptosis by activating the p53 signaling pathway. In conclusion, 60 mJ ESV substantially inhibited colorectal cancer growth by activating p53 pathway-related proliferation inhibition and cell death. These findings indicate that ESV therapy is a promising therapeutic strategy for colorectal cancer.
IntroductionColorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent malignancy of the digestive tract. Moreover, it has the third-highest morbidity and second-highest mortality rates globally1. Surgery is the most effective treatment for CRC, particularly during the early stages of tumour development2. However, a substantial number of patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease, frequently after metastasis to distant sites in the body or when the disease is otherwise unresectable3. Chemotherapy and ionising radiation are occasionally used to treat high-risk CRC4. However, these therapeutic regimens tend to have limited efficacy because of their severe side effects and toxicity5. Moreover, chemotherapeutic drugs tend to kill both cancer and normal cells indiscriminately. Despite considerable advances in diagnosis and treatment, the mortality rate of patients with CRC remains high and poses a major health burden worldwide6. Safe and relatively effective therapeutic options for CRC must be explored to improve patient survival and prognosis.Shock waves are supersonic pressure waves generated by shock tubes or lasers. Shock waves can deliver a sequence of transient pressure disturbances characterized by high amplitude, rapid pressure increase, short pulse duration, and rapid propagation7. The shock wave technique is a non-invasive, targeted, and extracorporeal therapeutic strategy with numerous medical applications8. Shock wave therapy has been established as a tolerable and effective method for the disintegration of urinary calculi and treatment of chronic tendinitis, bone and wound healing, and ischemic heart disease, eliciting promising results7,9,10. Furthermore, shock waves can increase cell membrane permeability and have been successfully used for drug delivery and gene transfer11. However, the application of shock-wave therapy in oncology remains poorly explored. In pre-clinical models, shock waves, especially in combination with several antineoplastic drugs, exert substantial effects. Specifically, shock waves enhance the antineoplastic effect of molecular iodine supplements in breast cancer12and effectively suppress the proliferation and growth of tongue squamous cell carcinoma when combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)13. Approximately 30 years ago, shock waves were first reported to increase the chemocytotoxicity of 5-FU in CRC cells via cavitation14. However, research on the effects of shock waves in CRC has been limited to in vitro cytotoxicity and lacks comprehensive investigations into the underlying mechanisms. Moreover, the therapeutic effects of shock waves alone on CRC are unknown.p53, also known as the guardian of the genome, is a classic tumour suppressor that limits cellular proliferation by inducing cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and ferroptosis15,16,17. p53 is activated by various stress signals, including DNA damage and oncogene activation and it orchestrates a plethora of downstream responses, such as DNA repair, cell cycle arrest, senescence, metabolism, and cell death17,18. Several chemotherapy regimens and radiotherapy rely on p53 activation and its downstream responses to impede cancer cell growth. The activation of p53 for induction of p53-related outcomes, such as cell death, in response to cancer therapy has been explored to improve clinical outcomes19,20. Therefore, identifying therapies capable of targeting p53 may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for CRC. We hypothesised that shock waves could activate p53-related cancer inhibition. To investigate this, we assessed the therapeutic effect of ESV alone in CRC xenograft mouse models. Furthermore, we explored the potential molecular mechanisms of ESV-mediated inhibition of CRC growth.ResultsEffects of stepwise increases in ESV energy on CRC xenograft tumour growthTo determine the therapeutic effect of ESV in vivo, a mouse model of subcutaneous tumours was established. Nude mice were subcutaneously injected with HT29 cells and tumour growth was observed daily (Fig. 1A). When the average tumour volume was approximately 50 mm3, ESV therapy (60, 120, and 240 mJ for 2000 shots) was administered every third day (Fig. 1B; supplementary Fig. 1). Body weight and tumour volume were measured at different time points (days 0, 3, 6, and 9 after ESV therapy). No significant changes were observed in body weight (Fig. 1C). Compared with day 0, Tumours increased in size by 262.8% in the control group on day 9. Administration of 60 mJ ESV significantly suppressed tumour growth, resulting in growth of only 141% (p < 0.01). The administration of 120 mJ ESV generated weak and non-significant inhibition, eliciting tumour growth of 197%, whereas 240 mJ ESV exerted no suppressive effect on tumour growth (249.3%, Fig. 1E). Examination of the animals after their final treatment show that those in the 240 mJ ESV group exhibited bruises, suggesting significant vascular lesions (Fig. 1D). After screening for ESV energy in the CRC xenograft mouse model, 60 mJ ESV was selected for subsequent in vivo experiments.Fig. 1Impact of stepwise increased dosage of ESV energy on CRC xenograft tumour growth. A Establishment of HT29-derived transplant tumour model in nude mice. B Schematic representation of increased dosages of ESV energy (60 mJ, 120 mJ and 240 mJ, 2000 shots, 12 Hz) at different time (every third day) in CRC xenograft model. C Body weights of control (Ctrl), 60 mJ, 120 mJ, and 240 mJ mice (n = 5). D The anatomy view of a mouse in 240 mJ group. E Relative tumour volumes at day 0, day 3, day 6, day 9 after the first ESV treatment (n = 5), and the representative images of tumours at the end of experiment. Tumour volume = (width2 × length)/2. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test. **p < 0.01.Full size imageAdministration of 60 mJ ESV delays the growth of CRC-derived xenograftsTo validate the therapeutic impact of 60 mJ ESV on CRC, we extended the experimental endpoint (days 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 after ESV therapy) and examined the side effects. In the second set of experiments, the weight of the mice was unaltered, consistent with the results of the previous experiment (Fig. 2A). Plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and creatinine (Cr) levels are biomarkers of hepatic and renal function, respectively. No differences were observed in serum ALT and Cr levels between the control and 60 mJ ESV groups, indicating that 60 mJ ESV did not induce notable toxicity (Fig. 2B, C). Mice administered ESV had slower tumour growth than mice in the control group (Fig. 2D). At the experimental endpoint (day 15), mice in the 60 mJ ESV group had smaller tumours than mice in the control group (Fig. 2E). Pathological examination revealed the absence of notable liver abnormalities, indicating no liver metastasis (Fig. 2F). In addition, the administration of 60 mJ ESV suppressed the growth of SW620-derived xenografts, another colorectal cancer cell line (supplementary Fig. 2). These results suggest that 60 mJ ESV can effectively suppress CRC growth in vivo without inducing toxicity.Fig. 260 mJ ESV suppresses the growth of HT29-derived xenografts. A Body weights of control (CON) and 60 mJ mice (n = 4). B–C Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and creatinine (Cr) in plasma (n = 4). D Relative tumour volumes at day 0, day 3, day 6, day 9, day 12 and day 15 after the first ESV treatment (n = 4). E Images of tumours at the end of the experiment (n = 4). F Mouse livers of 60 mJ ESV group at the end of the experiment (n = 2). Representative pictures of H&E staining of paraffin-embedded liver sections (Scale: 100 μm). Data are presented as means ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test. *p < 0.05.Full size imageAdministration of 60 mJ ESV blocks CRC cell proliferationTo elucidate the mechanisms through which shock waves inhibit CRC growth in transplant models, transcriptome analysis was performed using HT29-derived tumour tissues from the control (CON) and 60 mJ groups. RNA-Seq captures the transcriptional information of cells in a fixed state and provides a snapshot of the DNA expression profile at specific time points. RNA-Seq revealed that 60 mJ ESV reprogrammed the transcriptome, with 1748 upregulated genes and 2021 downregulated genes (Fig. 3A, B). Metascape was used to analyse differentially expressed genes between the two groups. Downregulated differentially expressed genes were primarily enriched in the ‘DNA metabolic process’ and ‘mitotic cell cycle’ (Fig. 3C). Mitosis is the basis for cell proliferation. Typically, tumour cells have abnormally active mitotic abilities and can rapidly proliferate. According to the RNA-seq data, the administration of 60 mJ ESV suppressed the proliferation of CRC cells. Ki-67 staining was performed to evaluate cell proliferation. The tumour tissues in the 60 mJ ESV group showed lower Ki-67 staining compared with those in control group (Fig. 3D; supplementary Fig. 4). These results indicate that ESV may exert therapeutic effects by suppressing the proliferation of CRC cells.Fig. 360 mJ ESV blocks the proliferation of CRC cells. A Volcano plot representing transcriptome differences between CON and 60 mJ ESV group. B The number of differentially expressed genes between CON and 60 mJ ESV group. C Metascape analysis of downregulated genes in 60 mJ ESV group. D Ki67-staining (Scale: 100 μm).Full size imageESV induces apoptosis and ferroptosis in CRC cellsCell death and cell cycle arrest contribute to the inhibition of cell proliferation. To explore the mechanism through which ESV blocks CRC cell growth, we performed a gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Genes upregulated in the ESV group were enriched in pathways associated with apoptosis (Fig. 4A). Based on western blot analysis, the application of ESV increased the expression of the apoptosis biomarkers cleaved-PARP and cleaved-caspase3 (Fig. 4B, C). IHC staining also verified the upregulated expression of cleaved-caspase3 in the ESV group (Fig. 4D; supplementary Fig. 4A). Moreover, the ferroptosis biomarkers AKR1C1 and COX2 were increased in the ESV group compared with the control group (Fig. 4E–G; supplementary Fig. 4B). These findings indicate that ESV can substantially induce apoptosis and ferroptosis in CRC tissues.Fig. 460 mJ ESV induces apoptosis and ferroptosis in CRC cells. A Gene set enrichment analysis plots for apoptosis. NES, normalized enrichment score; Black bars represent genes contained within the specific pathway ranked from positively expressed (left) to negatively expressed (right) based on log twofold change (60 mJ ESV vs. CON). B Western blot analysis of cleaved-PARP and cleaved-caspase3. C cleaved-PARP and cleaved-caspase3 densitometry relative to β-actin. D cleaved-caspase3 staining (Scale: 100 μm). E The relative mRNA levels of AKR1C1 and COX2 measured by real-time PCR. F Western blot analysis of AKR1C1 and COX2. G AKR1C1 and COX2 densitometry relative to β-actin. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.Full size imageESV effects on cell proliferation and death are related to the p53 pathwayTo determine the potential pathway involved in ESV-mediated CRC inhibition, Metascape and GSEA analyses were applied to the RNA-seq data. The results revealed the enrichment of the p53 signaling pathway gene set in the ESV group (Fig. 5A, B). Given that the p53 signaling pathway is a classic tumour suppressor that plays an important role in tumour regulation, we speculated that ESV could inhibit CRC growth via this pathway. We detected p53 mRNA and protein levels in HT29-derived tumours using real-time PCR and western blotting, respectively. ESV-treated mice exhibited upregulated p53 expression compared with control mice; this enhanced expression was confirmed by IHC staining for p53 (Fig. 5C–F; supplementary Fig. 4C). Collectively, these results suggest that ESV can suppress cell proliferation and induce apoptosis and ferroptosis by upregulating p53 expression in vivo.Fig. 5Effect of 60 mJ ESV on cell proliferation and death is related to p53 pathway. A Metascape analysis of upregulated genes in 60 mJ ESV group. B Gene set enrichment analysis plots for p53 pathway. C The relative mRNA level of p53 measured by real-time PCR. D Western blot analysis of P53. E P53 densitometry relative to β-actin. F P53 staining (Scale: 100 μm). Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test. *p < 0.05.Full size imageESV inhibits proliferation and promotes the death of CRC cells in vitroIn addition to the above in vivo animal experiments, we performed in vitro cell experiments. The CCK-8 assay showed that 60 mJ ESV markedly suppressed the proliferation of HT29 and SW620 cells in vitro (Fig. 6A; supplementary Fig. 5A). Flow cytometric analysis revealed that ESV-treated CRC cells had more cells in the G0/G1 phase (77.3%) than control cells (60.6%). ESV-treated cells were arrested at the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle and the percentage of cells in the S phase was reduced (Fig. 6B; supplementary Fig. 5B). Furthermore, flow cytometric analysis showed that treatment with ESV significantly increased the percentage of dead HT29 cells (PI+ cells, Fig. 6C; supplementary Fig. 5C). Treatment with ESV increased the levels of P53 protein in vitro, along with those of cleaved-PARP, cleaved-caspase3, AKR1C1, and COX2 (Fig. 6D, E). Collectively, these findings indicate that ESV could impede CRC growth via p53 pathway-mediated cell cycle arrest and cell death, both in vivo and in vitro.Fig. 6.60 mJ ESV inhibits proliferation and promotes death of CRC cells in vitro. A HT29 cell viability at day 3 and day 6 after treatment with 60 mJ ESV, 2000 shots, 12 Hz. B Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry to determine the percentage of cells in the indicated cell cycle phases. C Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry to determine the percentage of death cells. D Western blot analysis of P53, cleaved-PARP, cleaved-caspase3, AKR1C1 and COX2. E P53, cleaved-PARP, cleaved-caspase3, AKR1C1 and COX2 densitometry relative to β-actin. Data are presented as means ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.Full size imageDiscussionIn this study, we investigated the effects of ESV monotherapy against CRC growth both in vivo and in vitro and notable preclinical implications were identified. Firstly, animal experiments revealed that the administration of 60 mJ ESV decreased tumour growth without affecting body weight or liver and kidney functions. Secondly, in vivo and in vitro studies revealed ESV treatment suppressed CRC cell proliferation and induced apoptosis and ferroptosis. Thirdly, ESV therapy was determined to exert tumour-suppressive effects by reactivating the p53 signaling pathway. These results indicate that ESV therapy may be an effective therapeutic modality for suppressing CRC growth.Currently, effective and safe methods for treat patients with advanced-stage or unresectable cancer are lacking21. Therefore, ESV, which is non-invasive and targeted, could be a valuable cancer treatment and its inhibition of CRC was evaluated. ESV is most suitable for application to relatively superficial tissues and organs. ESV was found to effectively suppress the proliferation and growth of tongue squamous cell carcinoma and breast cancer, which are relatively superficial types of cancer in the human body12,13. Importantly, specific instruments to administer shock-wave therapy in patients with breast cancer have been developed and are undergoing preliminary clinical trials. The most important finding of our study was that administration of ESV alone could significantly reduce the tumour volume in nude mice with CRC transplanted subcutaneously, which is an animal model with a superficial tumour. However, colorectal tumours are located in the abdominal cavity rather than on the body surface. Further studies are required to explore the therapeutic effects of ESV using spontaneous CRC models, such as the APCmin/+mouse or azoxymethane/dextran sulfate sodium-induced mouse colitis-associated carcinogenesis model22.Thirty years ago, scientists explored the potential of shock waves as a tumour treatment. Shock waves can shatter tumour cells and injure the microvasculature, raising concerns regarding the risk of metastasis23,24. Subsequent studies revealed that the effects of shock waves on tumours depended on the shockwave energy. Aceves C et al. revealed that high-dose shock wave treatment (SW150/21.7 MPa) generated tissue lesions without decreasing tumour growth and promoted pro-tumour conditions. Conversely, low (SW35/9.9 MPa) shock wave doses had notable antineoplastic effects in breast cancer therapy12. Some studies have found that low-dose shock waves enhance free radical generation, ATP release, or membrane instability, which could induce apoptotic mechanisms, ultimately reducing tumour growth and diminishing the potential for tumour metastasis25. Consistent with these findings, our study investigated three different shock wave energies, demonstrating that low-energy (60 mJ) shock waves remarkably blocked CRC growth without liver metastasis. Conversely, 240 mJ failed to inhibit tumour growth and caused haematoma. However, lower energy ESV may not necessarily have a more significant anticancer effect. Compared with 60 mJ ESV, 30 mJ ESV did not inhibit the growth of CRC cells (supplementary Fig. 6). The shock waves may induce permanent damage to tumour cells, requiring a certain amount of energy deposition26, and the lack of cell death may be because the stress is below the damage threshold. Therefore, the damage threshold of ESV in CRC cells should be further investigated.In addition to energy, other mechanical parameters of shock waves, including peak pressure, rise time, and shock wave impulse, can also impact therapeutic outcomes. Schmidt et al.conducted in vitro experiments to examine the effects of shock waves on U87 brain cancer cells. The authors found that when the incident peak pressure exceeded a lethal level, shock waves could induce substantial cell damage27. Liao et al.found that shock waves with higher impulses decreased cell viability, whereas shock waves with similar peak pressures exerted distinct effects on cell viability28. In this study, we focused on the effects of shock waves of different energies on CRC growth. Additional studies are required to investigate the effects of other mechanical characteristics of shock waves on CRC cell viability.In conclusion, we present new in vivo and in vitro evidences demonstrating a novel method for treating CRC. The use of 60 mJ ESV could markedly suppress CRC growth by blocking the proliferation of cancer cells and inducing apoptosis and ferroptosis. Mechanistically, ESV may activate the p53 signaling pathway to inhibit CRC growth. Our study highlights that appropriate ESV energy may serve as an accessory option (i.e., ‘give it a try’) for patients with terminal-stage CRC who are refractory to conventional therapy.Materials and methodsMouse xenograft studiesAll protocols for animal procedures were approved by the ethics committee of Beijing Neurosurgical Institute Ethics Committee of Capital Medical University (BNI202304002). Six-to-eight-week-old male BALB/c nude mice were purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China) and subcutaneously injected with 1 × 106 HT29 or SW620 in 100 μL. The mice were observed daily for tumour growth. When the average tumour volume reached approximately 50 mm3, the mice were divided randomly into four groups, including control (Ctrl), 60 mJ, 120 mJ, and 240 mJ shock waves groups. The control group without any treatment, shock waves groups accepted ESV therapy with stepwise increased energy (60, 120, 240 mJ, 2000 shots, 12 Hz) at days 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 after therapy initiation. At the same time, the tumour volumes were measured once every 3 days to determine the effect of each therapeutic regimen. The lengths (L) and widths (W) of the tumours were measured, and the tumour volumes were calculated as (L × W2)/2. All experiments were performed according to the relevant guidelines, regulations, and ARRIVE guidelines.ESV application and definitionThe ESV machine, called lattice shock wave physiotherapy instrument (J Gendica, China), was utilized in the present study. In detail, the ESV energy could be adjusted prior to applying for the in vitro and in vivo studies. After a determination of machine parameters, the machine was switched on. The automatic shots to the specific tissues/cells were started on. We defined the ESV energy applied to animals as 60 mJ, 120 mJ, and 240 mJ (2000 shots, 12 Hz). Additionally, we defined the ESV energy applied to HT29 and SW620 cell lines as 60 mJ, 2000 shots, 12 Hz.RNA sequencingRNA samples were prepared from three biological replicates of HT29-derived xenograft tissues using TRIzol reagent. RNA quality was quantified using RNA integrity number. Sequencing libraries were constructed using the NEB Next Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina and quantified using the KAPA Library Quantification kit (KAPA Biosystems). The libraries were then sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq sequencer. 150 bp paired-end reads were mapped to human hg19 genome. Cuffdiff was used to analyze differentially expressed genes between the samples.Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysisParaffin-embedded xenografts were cut into 4 mm sections. The sections were dewaxed and hydrated, and then blocked and incubated with primary antibodies against Ki67 (Cell Signaling Technology, 12202, 1:200), P53 (Proteintech, 60283-2-Ig, 1:1000), cleaved-caspase3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9664T, 1:1000) at 4 °C overnight. The signals were visualized using a two-step plus®Poly-HRP Anti-Mouse/Rabbit IgG Detection System (OriGene, PV9000). Counterstaining was performed using hematoxylin. The sections were digitally scanned under a microscope with an FL-20 cooled camera, and images were analyzed using the Mosaic™ V2.1 software.Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reactionThe total RNA content was isolated from cells or the tumour using TRIzol™ reagent (Invitrogen), treated with DNase I (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# EN0521), and then reverse transcribed into cDNA using a Maximal First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# K1622). Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using an S1000 PCR instrument (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) to quantify gene expression. The PCR data were normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase expression at the mRNA level. The primers used are listed in Supplementary Table S1.Western blottingProteins were extracted from tumour tissues or cells with RIPA buffer (0.01% EDTA, 0.1% TritonX-100 and 10% proteinase inhibitor cocktail). Protein concentrations were quantified with a protein assay kit (Bio-Rad). 100 μg lysate were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were probed overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody against human P53 (Cell Signaling Technology, 48818S, 1:1000), β-actin (Sigma, 1:10,000), cleaved-caspase3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9664T, 1:1000), cleaved-PARP (Cell Signaling Technology, 9541T, 1:1000), AKR1C1 (Abcam, ab192785, 1:1000), COX2 (Abcam, ab179800, 1:1000), followed by incubation with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, 1:10,000) for 1.5 h. The signal was visualized with ECL (Millipore).Statistical analysisAll experiments were independently repeated at least three times unless stated otherwise. Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism software (version 8.0). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Two groups were compared using the Student’s t-test for unpaired data. Comparisons among more than two groups were performed using ANOVA and Tukey’s test. For all tests, P values ≤ 0.05, were considered statistically significant (*P < 0.05).
Data availability
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) with GSE290314.
ReferencesSung, H. et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71, 209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Zhang, X. et al. Glutathione peroxidase 4 as a therapeutic target for anti-colorectal cancer drug-tolerant persister cells. Front. Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.913669 (2022).Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Cañellas-Socias, A. et al. Metastatic recurrence in colorectal cancer arises from residual EMP1(+) cells. Nature 611, 603–613. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05402-9 (2022).Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Dariya, B., Aliya, S., Merchant, N., Alam, A. & Nagaraju, G. P. Colorectal cancer biology, diagnosis, and therapeutic approaches. Crit. Rev. Oncog. 25, 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevOncog.2020035067 (2020).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rehman, S. K. et al. Colorectal cancer cells enter a diapause-like DTP state to survive chemotherapy. Cell 184, 226-242.e221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.018 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ionescu, V. A., Gheorghe, G., Bacalbasa, N., Chiotoroiu, A. L. & Diaconu, C. Colorectal cancer: from risk factors to oncogenesis. Medicina (Kaunas) 59, 1646. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091646 (2023).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nishida, T. et al. Extracorporeal cardiac shock wave therapy markedly ameliorates ischemia-induced myocardial dysfunction in pigs in vivo. Circulation 110, 3055–3061. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.Cir.0000148849.51177.97 (2004).Article
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Chen, H. et al. Recent progress in development of new sonosensitizers for sonodynamic cancer therapy. Drug Discov. Today 19, 502–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2014.01.010 (2014).Article
CAS
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Rompe, J. D., Zoellner, J. & Nafe, B. Shock wave therapy versus conventional surgery in the treatment of calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 387, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200106000-00010 (2001).Article
Google Scholar
Wang, L. et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in treatment of delayed bone-tendon healing. Am. J. Sports Med. 36, 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546507307402 (2008).Article
CAS
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Kodama, T., Doukas, A. G. & Hamblin, M. R. Shock wave-mediated molecular delivery into cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1542, 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-4889(01)00177-x (2002).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Peña, M. et al. Shock wave application increases the antineoplastic effect of molecular Iodine supplement in breast cancer xenografts. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 46, 649–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.11.015 (2020).Article
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Chang, C. L. et al. Combined high energy of extracorporeal shock wave and 5-FU effectively suppressed the proliferation and growth of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Biomed. Pharmacother. 142, 112036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112036 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Prat, F. et al. Increased chemocytotoxicity to colon cancer cells by shock wave-induced cavitation. Gastroenterology 106, 937–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(94)90752-8 (1994).Article
CAS
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Symonds, H. et al. p53-dependent apoptosis suppresses tumor growth and progression in vivo. Cell 78, 703–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(94)90534-7 (1994).Article
CAS
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Liu, F. et al. Downregulation of CPT2 promotes proliferation and inhibits apoptosis through p53 pathway in colorectal cancer. Cell Signal 92, 110267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2022.110267 (2022).Article
CAS
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Jiang, L. et al. Ferroptosis as a p53-mediated activity during tumour suppression. Nature 520, 57–62 (2015).Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
MATH
Google Scholar
Oren, M. & Prives, C. p53: A tale of complexity and context. Cell 187, 1569–1573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2024.02.043 (2024).Article
CAS
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Hassin, O. & Oren, M. Drugging p53 in cancer: one protein, many targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 22, 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-022-00571-8 (2023).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Peuget, S., Zhou, X. & Selivanova, G. Translating p53-based therapies for cancer into the clinic. Nat. Rev. Cancer 24, 192–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-023-00658-3 (2024).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rawla, P., Sunkara, T. & Barsouk, A. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Prz Gastroenterol. 14, 89–103. https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2018.81072 (2019).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
MATH
Google Scholar
Zhang, X. et al. High-fat diet aggravates colitis-associated carcinogenesis by evading ferroptosis in the ER stress-mediated pathway. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 177, 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.10.022 (2021).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dellian, M. et al. High-energy shock waves enhance hyperthermic response of tumors: Effects on blood flow, energy metabolism, and tumor growth. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 86, 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/86.4.287 (1994).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Oosterhof, G. O., Cornel, E. B., Smits, G. A., Debruyne, F. M. & Schalken, J. A. The influence of high-energy shock waves on the development of metastases. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 22, 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-5629(95)02051-9 (1996).Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
López-Marín, L. M. et al. Shock wave-induced damage and poration in eukaryotic cell membranes. J. Membr. Biol. 250, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-016-9921-2 (2017).Article
CAS
PubMed
MATH
Google Scholar
Li, D. et al. Response of single cells to shock waves and numerically optimized waveforms for cancer therapy. Biophys. J. 114, 1433–1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.09.042 (2018).Article
ADS
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
MATH
Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. et al. Characterization of a setup to test the impact of high-amplitude pressure waves on living cells. Sci. Rep. 4, 3849. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03849 (2014).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
MATH
Google Scholar
Liao, Y. et al. Shock wave impact on the viability of MDA-MB-231 cells. PLoS One 15, e0234138. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234138 (2020).Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Download referencesFundingThis work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (82203229); the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (JCYJ20220531094005012), and the opening project of State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology (Beijing Institute of Technology, KFJJ22-16M).Author informationAuthors and AffiliationsDepartment of Injury and Repair, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, 119 Xincun Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100000, ChinaXiaoli ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong, 518000, ChinaXiaoli Zhang, Qingzhi Song & Guoqing LvChina Ordnance Society, 10 Chedaogou, Haidian District, Beijing, 100000, ChinaChun RanAuthorsXiaoli ZhangView author publicationsYou can also search for this author inPubMed Google ScholarChun RanView author publicationsYou can also search for this author inPubMed Google ScholarQingzhi SongView author publicationsYou can also search for this author inPubMed Google ScholarGuoqing LvView author publicationsYou can also search for this author inPubMed Google ScholarContributionsXLZ and QZS performed the experiments. XLZ and CR designed experimental protocols, interpreted data obtained from the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. GQL edited the manuscript.Corresponding authorsCorrespondence to
Xiaoli Zhang or Chun Ran.Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethic statement
Our studies did not include human participants, human data or human tissue. All the animal protocols containing all the procedures were approved by the ethics committee of Beijing Neurosurgical Institute Ethics Committee of Capital Medical University, and were performed in accordance with all regulatory standards.
Additional informationPublisher’s noteSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Supplementary InformationSupplementary Information 1.Supplementary Information 2.Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Reprints and permissionsAbout this articleCite this articleZhang, X., Ran, C., Song, Q. et al. Extracorporeal shock waves effectively suppress colorectal cancer proliferation and growth.
Sci Rep 15, 9769 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94386-3Download citationReceived: 22 August 2024Accepted: 13 March 2025Published: 21 March 2025DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94386-3Share this articleAnyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:Get shareable linkSorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.Copy to clipboard
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
KeywordsExtracorporeal shock wavesColorectal cancerP53 signaling pathwayXenograft mouse modelFerroptosis