Nigeria has the third highest maternal mortality rates globally. Stock photo.
Nigeria has the third highest maternal mortality rates globally. Stock photo.
AT RISK
Image: 123RF
Nigeria’s government launched an initiative in 2024 offering free emergency caesarean sections to poor and vulnerable women, in a plan to bring down the high number of mothers dying in childbirth.
Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas, a maternal and newborn health researcher, and Itohan Osayande, a teaching fellow in public health, discuss the initiative and how it can achieve its objectives.
How serious is the maternal mortality challenge in Nigeria?
Of the 287,000 pregnant women who died in 2020, almost a third were from Nigeria. At 1,047 deaths per 100,000 live births, Nigeria has the third-highest maternal mortality rates globally. This is behind South Sudan and Chad.
The leading causes of maternal deaths are severe bleeding, infections, high-blood pressure during pregnancy and unsafe abortions. These deaths are mostly preventable if pregnant women get emergency obstetric care, including caesarean sections.
What drives Nigeria’s maternal mortality?
There are several factors.
At an individual level, there is evidence that women delay seeking care, for various reasons. The cost of care and lack of awareness of danger signs are among them. There are also cultural norms that advise against life-saving measures like caesarean section.
There are also issues related to Nigeria’s health-care system. Research shows that women don’t always get the care they need when they get to a health facility. This might be because health facilities do not provide care as women cannot afford to pay. For others who cannot pay but receive care, some are unlawfully detained in the health facility until they pay. Other shortcomings include ineffective referral systems and a shortage of skilled health-care professionals. In recent years, there has been a sharp increase in health professionals migrating to other countries.
Inability to pay means that some women do not even seek care in health facilities. They end up delaying presentation at health facilities or going to traditional birth attendants, putting them and their unborn babies at risk of complications and death.
### Gynaes ‘play it safe’ when delivering babies as medico-legal claims bite
High risk of being sued forces changes in dealing with childbirthNews1 year ago
Beyond the health-care system, other factors include poor roads to care. Many pregnant women in Nigeria are left to travel to health facilities on their own even in an emergency. In rural areas, women face long travel distances to reach the nearest hospital.
Also, conflict displaces pregnant women and their families from their homes and disrupts access to health care.
Will the new initiative reduce deaths?
The initiative aims to increase health facility use and skilled birth attendance by 60%. It also aims to reduce maternal mortality by 30% within three years.
It recognises that Nigeria’s maternal mortality challenge is multifaceted and only a multipronged approach can tackle it. It also recognises that though it is a national problem, solutions need to be driven at subnational levels.
The scheme includes a suite of community-centred interventions to be implemented starting in the 17 states that contribute over half of the maternal deaths reported in Nigeria. These include:
empowering community-level leaders in Ward Development Committees to track and encourage pregnant women to use maternity services in primary health centres;
advocacy by prominent people to promote safe delivery practices;
partnering with traditional birth attendants to refer pregnant women to health facilities;
revitalising the national emergency medical service and ambulance system
the offer of free caesarean sections for poor and vulnerable women.
The offer of free caesarean sections generated a lot of interest in the global community when it was announced.
What conditions are attached to the free caesarean scheme?
Pregnant women have to be enrolled in Nigeria’s national health insurance scheme to access free caesarean sections.
This is a double-edged sword.
Linking eligibility to health insurance registration offers the federal government and health facilities an opportunity to recoup some costs to sustain the free initiative. Nigerians who have health insurance pay a premium monthly.
However, those who are indigent and cannot afford a caesarean section are mostly not subscribed to the insurance scheme.
### Pregnant women in SA should be offered social grants — it will save the state money in the long run
Many studies have shown that pregnancy support grants or vouchers improve women’s nutritional status.Opinion & Analysis1 year ago
Before the 2022 National Health Insurance Authority Act, which made health insurance mandatory for all citizens and legal residents, nationwide registration on a health insurance scheme was only 3%. Most of the subscribers work in the formal sector. However, only 19 in 100 Nigerians had health insurance in 2024.
Are there any countries with similar initiatives?
Some African countries have taken steps to improve access to life-saving maternal health-care interventions, including caesarean section, by removing user fees.
Examples are Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Kenya, Mali, Morocco, Niger and Senegal.
Though evidence on the affect of free caesarean section policies on reducing maternal mortality is not conclusive, there are now higher rates of caesarean section, particularly among women from lower-income, rural and less educated backgrounds.
Free delivery and caesarean section policies in Ghana and Burkina Faso led to a 45% reduction in the neonatal mortality rate and 54% reduction in infant mortality rate compared to Nigeria and Zambia where no such policies existed. This suggests that the benefits of such schemes go beyond pregnancy and childbirth.
What needs to happen to ensure the policy succeeds?
There are lessons from countries that have implemented similar schemes.
“Free” caesarean without free delivery may lead to more women being identified as needing a caesarean, since the vaginal childbirth might come at a higher cost to the pregnant woman. While a caesarean can be life-saving, unnecessary surgeries are not advised, as it is not risk-free. Making both vaginal childbirth and caesarean “free” should be considered.
Free needs to truly mean free. Stockout of medications, blood and blood products, and consumables might force people to pay to get them.
### Single mother joins exodus of SA nurses in search of greener pastures abroad
Poor working conditions, low pay and persistent shortages of resources are pushing well-trained professionals out of the country.News2 years ago
Skilled health personnel must follow clear guidelines to assess whether a caesarean is necessary or not. Audit and feedback on the use of the procedure will help in identifying any patterns of abuse or misuse.
There’s a need to stem the tide of emigrating doctors and nurses so that those who can perform the procedure are in the facilities when pregnant women need care.
The Nigerian government will need to explore innovative financing mechanisms to sustain the policy. With the recent funding cuts and withdrawals in foreign aid from the US, help is unlikely to come from outside.
Giving verified private sector providers incentives to buy into the scheme should also be considered.
The scheme should also be extended to women on community-based health insurance schemes, which are more likely within the financial reach of poorer families.
Its implementation needs to be evidence-based and adaptable for the scheme to succeed.
• Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas is an associate professor at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine; Itohan Osayande is a Teaching Fellow in Public Health at the University of Greenwich.
This article was first published in The Conversation