nature.com

Automated lifestyle interventions and weight loss: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Abstract

Background/objectives

Overweight and obesity drive cardiometabolic disease and high-intensity lifestyle interventions are standard. However, many health-systems cannot offer these interventions and many patients cannot participate even when available. Trials have assessed automated digital lifestyle interventions to improve accessibility. This systematic review identified automated digital lifestyle interventions and assessed their impact on weight loss.

Subjects/methods

The review (CRD42023435700) identified randomized controlled trials of at least 3-months duration assessing automated digital lifestyle interventions’ impact on weight loss. Data were managed through Covidence with double-blinded screening of titles/abstracts and double-blinded full-text review to determine study inclusion. Data extraction was completed by one reviewer (NWC) and verified by a second (MM, JS, TE, CE). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool was used to assess bias risk and study quality was rated as High, Moderate, Low, or Very Low.

Results

The search identified 1817 citations. The full-text of 60 reports were assessed and 17 reports of 16 studies were included. The majority (63%) were of moderate quality. No intervention produced 5% weight loss from baseline. Intervention components with the largest impact were text message encouragement and education with a cognitive behavioral approach. No specific form of self-monitoring was most effective, though some form of self-monitoring was included in most trials.

Conclusions

Some components of the automated digital lifestyle interventions showed promise. Research is needed to optimize these components (e.g., tailored messaging, cognitive-behavioral approaches) balanced with human contact. Considering the magnitude of the problem and its disproportionate impact on low socioeconomic and minority patients, interventions optimized for effect and scalability are needed to address overweight and obesity.

Access through your institution

Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$259.00 per year

only $21.58 per issue

Learn more

Buy this article

Purchase on SpringerLink

Instant access to full article PDF

Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Log in

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Read our FAQs

Contact customer support

Fig. 1

References

Martin SS, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Anderson CAM, Arora P, Avery CL, et al. 2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: a report of US and global data from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2024;149:e347–e913.

PubMedGoogle Scholar

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Obesity and weight management for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes: standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care. 2024;47:S145–57.

Google Scholar

Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, Ard JD, Comuzzie AG, Donato KA, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. Circulation. 2014;129:S102–38.

PubMedGoogle Scholar

Ely EK, Gruss SM, Luman ET, Gregg EW, Ali MK, Nhim K, et al. A national effort to prevent type 2 diabetes: participant-level evaluation of CDC’s national diabetes prevention program. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:1331–41.

PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Porter J, Boyd C, Skandari MR, Laiteerapong N. Revisiting the time needed to provide adult primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2023;38:147–55.

PubMedGoogle Scholar

Marcolino MS, Oliveira JAQ, D’Agostino M, Ribeiro AL, Alkmim MBM, Novillo-Ortiz D. The impact of mHealth interventions: systematic review of systematic reviews. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6:e23.

PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Curry D. MyFitnessPal Revenue and Usage Statistics (2024). Business of Apps. Available at: https://www.businessofapps.com/data/myfitnesspal-statistics/. Accessed 22 April 2024.

Carris N, Bullers K, Eubanks T, Epperson C, McKee M, Sempek J, et al. The impact of automated lifestyle interventions on health outcomes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023435700 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023435700. Accessed 22 April 2024.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clin Res ed). 2021;372:n71.

Google Scholar

McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40–6.

PubMedGoogle Scholar

Glanville J, Foxlee R, Wisniewski S, Noel-Storr A, Edwards M, Dooley G. Translating the Cochrane EMBASE RCT filter from the Ovid interface to Embase.com: a case study. Health Info Libr J. 2019;36:264–77.

PubMedGoogle Scholar

Covidence. Systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia. Available at www.covidence.org.

Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (Clin Res ed). 2011;343:d5928.

Google Scholar

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (Clin Res ed). 2008;336:924–6.

Google Scholar

Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:401–6.

PubMedGoogle Scholar

Baer HJ, Rozenblum R, De La Cruz BA, Orav EJ, Wien M, Nolido NV, et al. Effect of an online weight management program integrated with population health management on weight change: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;324:1737–46.

PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Bootwong P, Intarut N. The effects of text messages for promoting physical activities in prediabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Telemed J E Health. 2022;28:896–903.

PubMedGoogle Scholar

Glasgow RE, Kurz D, King D, Dickman JM, Faber AJ, Halterman E, et al. Twelve-month outcomes of an Internet-based diabetes self-management support program. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;87:81–92.

PubMedGoogle Scholar

Gomez-Marcos MA, Patino-Alonso MC, Recio-Rodriguez JI, Agudo-Conde C, Romaguera-Bosch M, Magdalena-Gonzalez O, et al. Short- and long-term effectiveness of a smartphone application for improving measures of adiposity: a randomised clinical trial - EVIDENT II study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018;17:552–62.

PubMedGoogle Scholar

Greene J, Sacks R, Piniewski B, Kil D, Hahn JS. The impact of an online social network with wireless monitoring devices on physical activity and weight loss. J Prim Care Community Health. 2013;4:189–94.

PubMedGoogle Scholar

Hajna S, Sharp SJ, Cooper AJM, Williams KM, van Sluijs EMF, Brage S, et al. Effectiveness of minimal contact interventions: an RCT. Am J Prev Med. 2021;60:e111–e21.

PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Hoerster KD, Hunter-Merrill R, Nguyen T, Rise P, Barón AE, McDowell J, et al. Effect of a remotely delivered self-directed behavioral intervention on body weight and physical health status among adults with obesity: the D-ELITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;328:2230–41.

PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

King AC, Campero MI, Sheats JL, Castro Sweet CM, Hauser ME, Garcia D, et al. Effects of counseling by peer human advisors vs computers to increase walking in underserved populations: the COMPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180:1481–90.

PubMedGoogle Scholar

Laing BY, Mangione CM, Tseng CH, Leng M, Vaisberg E, Mahida M, et al. Effectiveness of a smartphone application for weight loss compared with usual care in overweight primary care patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:S5–12.

PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Lugones-Sanchez C, Recio-Rodriguez JI, Agudo-Conde C, Repiso-Gento I, G Adalia E, Ramirez-Manent JI, et al. Long-term effectiveness of a smartphone app combined with a smart band on weight loss, physical activity, and caloric intake in a population with overweight and obesity (evident 3 study): randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24:e30416.

PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Lugones-Sanchez C, Sanchez-Calavera MA, Repiso-Gento I, Adalia EG, Ramirez-Manent JI, Agudo-Conde C, et al. Effectiveness of an mHealth intervention combining a smartphone app and smart band on body composition in an overweight and obese population: randomized controlled trial (EVIDENT 3 Study). JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8:e21771.

PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Mensorio MS, Cebolla-Martí A, Rodilla E, Palomar G, Lisón JF, Botella C, et al. Analysis of the efficacy of an internet-based self-administered intervention (“Living Better”) to promote healthy habits in a population with obesity and hypertension: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. Int J Med Inf. 2019;124:13–23.

Google Scholar

Shaw RJ, Bosworth HB, Silva SS, Lipkus IM, Davis LL, Sha RS, et al. Mobile health messages help sustain recent weight loss. Am J Med. 2013;126:1002–9.

PubMedGoogle Scholar

Silina V, Tessma MK, Senkane S, Krievina G, Bahs G. Text messaging (SMS) as a tool to facilitate weight loss and prevent metabolic deterioration in clinically healthy overweight and obese subjects: a randomised controlled trial. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017;35:262–70.

PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Tate DF, Kraschnewski JL, Martinez C, Diamond M, Veldheer S, Hwang KO, et al. A cluster-randomized controlled trial of automated internet weight-loss programs in primary care: role of automated provider feedback. Obesity. 2022;30:2363–75.

PubMedGoogle Scholar

Jahangiry L, Shojaeizadeh D, Abbasalizad Farhangi M, Yaseri M, Mohammad K, Najafi M, et al. Interactive web-based lifestyle intervention and metabolic syndrome: findings from the Red Ruby (a randomized controlled trial). Trials. 2015;16:418.

PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Peimani M, Rambod C, Omidvar M, Larijani B, Ghodssi-Ghassemabadi R, Tootee A, et al. Effectiveness of short message service-based intervention (SMS) on self-care in type 2 diabetes: a feasibility study. Prim Care Diabetes. 2016;10:251–8.

PubMedGoogle Scholar

Oussedik E, Foy CG, Masicampo EJ, Kammrath LK, Anderson RE, Feldman SR. Accountability: a missing construct in models of adherence behavior and in clinical practice. Patient Prefer Adher. 2017;11:1285–94.

Google Scholar

Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ (Clin Res ed). 2014;348:g1687.

Google Scholar

Cowart K, Updike W, Bullers K. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials evaluating glycemic efficacy and patient satisfaction of intermittent-scanned continuous glucose monitoring in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020;22:337–45.

PubMedGoogle Scholar

Kelly WN, Ho MJ, Bullers K, Klocksieben F, Kumar A. Association of pharmacist counseling with adherence, 30-day readmission, and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Pharmacists Assoc. 2021;61:340–50.e5.

Google Scholar

Kelly WN, Ho MJ, Smith T, Bullers K, Kumar A. Association of pharmacist intervention counseling with medication adherence and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2023;63:1095–105.

Google Scholar

Updike WH, Pane O, Franks R, Saber F, Abdeen F, Balazy DD, et al. Is it time to expand glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use for weight loss in patients without diabetes? Drugs. 2021;81:881–93.

CASPubMedGoogle Scholar

Carris NW, Taylor JR, Gums JG. Combining a GLP-1 receptor agonist and basal insulin: study evidence and practical considerations. Drugs. 2014;74:2141–52.

CASPubMedGoogle Scholar

Carris NW, Pardo J, Montero J, Shaeer KM. Minocycline as a substitute for doxycycline in targeted scenarios: a systematic review. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2015;2:ofv178.

PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Patel RV, Shaeer KM, Patel P, Garmaza A, Wiangkham K, Franks RB, et al. EPA-registered repellents for mosquitoes transmitting emerging viral disease. Pharmacotherapy. 2016;36:1272–80.

CASPubMedGoogle Scholar

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Diabetes technology: standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes care. 2024;47:S126–44.

Google Scholar

Anderson K. Popular fad diets: an evidence-based perspective. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2023;77:78–85.

PubMedGoogle Scholar

Internet/broadband fact sheet. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Technology 2021. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/. Accessed 23 April 2024.

Mobile fact sheet. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. 2021. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/. Accessed 23 April 2024.

Rodriguez LA, Bradshaw PT, Shiboski SC, Fernandez A, Vittinghoff E, Herrington D, et al. Examining if the relationship between BMI and incident type 2 diabetes among middle-older aged adults varies by race/ethnicity: evidence from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Diabet Med. 2021;38:e14377.

CASPubMedGoogle Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Pharmacotherapeutics and Clinical Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

Nicholas W. Carris, Mariam McKee, Jena Schanze, Taylor Eubanks & Christa Epperson

USF Health Libraries, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

Krystal Bullers

Department of Child & Family Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

Marilyn Stern

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

Brian E. Bunnell

Authors

Nicholas W. Carris

View author publications

You can also search for this author inPubMedGoogle Scholar

2. Krystal Bullers

View author publications

You can also search for this author inPubMedGoogle Scholar

3. Mariam McKee

View author publications

You can also search for this author inPubMedGoogle Scholar

4. Jena Schanze

View author publications

You can also search for this author inPubMedGoogle Scholar

5. Taylor Eubanks

View author publications

You can also search for this author inPubMedGoogle Scholar

6. Christa Epperson

View author publications

You can also search for this author inPubMedGoogle Scholar

7. Marilyn Stern

View author publications

You can also search for this author inPubMedGoogle Scholar

8. Brian E. Bunnell

View author publications

You can also search for this author inPubMedGoogle Scholar

Contributions

Nicholas W. Carris: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review & Editing, Supervision Krystal Bullers: Methodology, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review & Editing Mariam McKee: Investigation, Writing—Review & Editing Jena Sempek: Investigation, Writing—Review & Editing Taylor Eubanks: Investigation, Writing—Review & Editing Christa Epperson: Investigation, Writing—Review & Editing Marilyn Stern: Writing—Review & Editing Brian E. Bunnell: Writing—Review & Editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nicholas W. Carris or Brian E. Bunnell.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

NWC reports research funding from Sanofi Winthrop Industrie with funds received and managed by the University of South Florida. BEB has equity in Adhere.ly LLC, a health technology company. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carris, N.W., Bullers, K., McKee, M. et al. Automated lifestyle interventions and weight loss: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Int J Obes (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-025-01746-0

Download citation

Received:15 August 2024

Revised:22 February 2025

Accepted:12 March 2025

Published:29 March 2025

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-025-01746-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Get shareable link

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Copy to clipboard

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Read full news in source page