[Lucas Paquetá](https://www.claretandhugh.info/lucas-paqueta-bio/) could potentially counter-sue the Football Association if he’s found innocent of betting irregularities.
It’s a thought that’s crossed my mind recently—especially when considering why the FA appears to be pushing so hard for a lifetime ban (if reports are to be believed). If Paquetá is cleared, there’s every chance he and his legal team could seek damages for lost revenue.
At the heart of this would be the collapsed £80 million transfer from West Ham to Manchester City, which was widely reported and believed to be days away from completion when news of the FA investigation broke.
Presumably, City’s interest could be proven easily, given the formal bid and public links at the time. It’s reasonable to assume that Paquetá would have at least doubled his wages had he moved to the oil-rich Etihad club, so any compensation claim could come with a hefty financial price tag for the FA.
But it’s not just about wages. There’s the mental toll of enduring an investigation that has dragged on for over 18 months. If Paquetá can demonstrate that he missed out on a once-in-a-lifetime move due to the FA’s actions—and that he’s been mentally and financially impacted—the FA may well find themselves liable for significant damages.
It’s even possible that this looming threat explains why the FA is reportedly pushing so aggressively for a guilty verdict. Anything less could open the door for legal action.
And let’s not forget West Ham in all this. If Paquetá can prove he’s suffered financial loss, then the Hammers—who stood to make a sizeable profit from his sale—may also consider pursuing compensation.
This isn’t just a footballing matter anymore. It’s a legal, financial, and reputational minefield—especially if the FA fail to secure a conviction.