In a recent media outing, Chelsea co-owner Todd Boehly said something illuminating about his style: “When you own intellectual property like us, you’re only limited by your creativity as to where it goes.”
In football, intellectual property (IP) is business speak for, in this case, Chelsea’s brand, their image rights and the license to use the badge to sell products, services and experiences.
That IP is the reason that Todd Boehly, alongside Behdad Eghbali’s Clearlake Capital and a handful of other giants in the world of sports investment, spent to £2.5bn to take over Chelsea.
Diagram illustrating the ownership of Chelsea, split between factions led by Todd Boehly and Behdad Eghbali's Clearlake Capital
Chelsea ownership diagram Credit: Adam Williams/GRV Media/The Chelsea Chronicle
On paper, Chelsea look like a money pit. They’ve lost £367m in the last three published financial years – and we don’t even have 2023-24’s figures yet, which will likely show an operating loss of over £250m.
If the business isn’t making anywhere near enough money to cover costs, it falls on Chelsea’s owners to underwrite those losses via equity or loans, with the Clearlake-Boehly regime favouring the former.
Last week, there was another share issue, which is a mechanism through which the owners inject money into a business via the equity structure. It cost Boehly and Clearlake £65m.
Photo by Darren Walsh/Chelsea FC via Getty Images
Photo by Darren Walsh/Chelsea FC via Getty Images
The owners have plunged nearly £350m into the club this way in the last 12 months alone. They have also taken on third-party debt of £500m from Ares Management, on top of almost £500m in transfer debt.
Boehly, Eghbali, Mark Walter, Hansjorg Wyss and the rest of their colleagues in the crowded Chelsea corporate structure have also committed £1.75bn for the redevelopment of Stamford Bridge.
MORE CHELSEA STORIES
Basically, owning a club like Chelsea isn’t cheap – and how exactly the club’s financial backers ultimately plan to generate a return on their investment isn’t clear.
That said, Boehly, in the same interview with Bloomberg that touches on IP, insisted that “the industry is going to continue to go up in value.
“There is more revenue and attention coming in this direction, so it isn’t as if these valuations [of Premier League clubs and sports franchises in general] don’t make sense.
“They continue to make sense. There are very few [franchises], but they are the beating heart throughout the industry. Then, you have all these other industries developing around the beating heart.
“If the beating heart continues to go up in value, all the ancillary activity is going to continue to go up in value.”
But even massive success on the pitch in the Premier League and Champions League would barely make up the £200m-plus in operating losses that the Blues are currently posting each season.
So where is the value that Boehly – as well as dozens of other investors, especially from the United States private equity sphere – describes coming from, if it exists at all?
Chart showing the various nationalities of Premier League club investors, including Chelsea's Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital
Premier League club owner nationalities Credit: Adam Williams/ The Chelsea Chronicle/GRV Media
Could it be that the valuations of clubs like Chelsea are a speculative bubble that will burst if the markets conclude that prices have surpassed the inherent value of football teams as businesses?
Well, if Boehly’s record elsewhere is anything to go off, it’s unlikely that he’s backed the wrong horse.
Through Eldridge Industries, the 52-year-old is one of sport’s most successful investors and an almost deified figure within the industry.
Name Rank in top 500 Net worth Club(s)
Bernard Arnault 4 $189B Paris FC
Mark Mateschitz 80 $23.4B Red Bull clubs
Stan Kroenke 85 $22.8B Arsenal, Colorado Rapids
Philip Anschutz 86 $22.8B Los Angeles Galaxy
David Tepper 87 $22.4B Charlotte FC
Francois Pinault 90 $22.1B Stade Rennais
Dietmar Hopp 112 $18.4B 1899 Hoffenheim
Jim Ratcliffe 200 $12.4B Man United, Nice, Lausanne
Hansjoerg Wyss 218 $11.9B Chelsea, Strasbourg
Josh Harris 224 $11.7B Crystal Palace
Simon Reuben 227 $11.5B Newcastle United
David Reuben 228 $11.5B Newcastle United
Dmitry Rybolovlev 246 $11.1B AS Monaco
Mark Walter 252 $10.9B Chelsea, Strasbourg
Dan Friedkin 253 $10.9B AS Roma, AS Cannes, Everton
Shahid Khan 307 $9.33B Fulham
Nassef Sawiris 324 $8.95B Aston Villa, Vitoria
Daniel Kretinsky 402 $7.69B West Ham, Sparta Prague
Joe Lewis 405 $7.66B Tottenham
Todd Boehly 426 $7.28B Chelsea FC, Strasbourg
Richest private owners in football, sourced from Bloomberg Billionaires Index
And the latest news illustrates exactly why the American billionaire has carved out that prestigious status.
Todd Boehly’s sports empire soars in value amid Clearlake rift
Boehly’s portfolio encompasses a number of different sports. He recently acquired a significant stake in London Spirit, a Hundred cricket franchise, for example.
But it’s on the other side of the Atlantic that Boehly’s biggest and most lucrative investments are found.
With fellow Chelsea investor Mark Walter, he owns a 27 per cent stake in NBA franchise the Los Angeles Lakers, as well as a 20 per cent stake in baseball’s 2024 World Series champions Los Angeles Dodgers.
The Dodgers had a magnificent 2024 and, thanks in part to the arrival of Japanese pitcher Shohei Otani – whose £550m, 10-year contract is one of the most lucrative in sports history – have skyrocketed in value.
Per a new ranking from industry experts Sportico, the Dodgers are now worth £6.5bn and have risen in value by a staggering 23 per cent in the last year alone, which was twice as fast as the next challenger.
They are also top of the pile in the revenue per game category.
And, at £6.5bn, the Dodgers’ worth has appreciated by 400 per cent since Walter and Boehly paid around £1.5bn to buy them back in 2012.
The Yankees are #1 for the 5th straight year, but the Dodgers closed the game dramatically in Year 1 of Ohtani. Dodgers value up an MLB-high 23% to $7.73B.
The Dodgers join the Dallas Cowboys, Real Madrid and FC Barcelona as the only sports teams to generate $1 billion in gross… https://t.co/TqPuDgOgq7
— Kurt Badenhausen (@kbadenhausen) March 25, 2025
View Tweet
It’s the kind of record which will give critics pause for thought at Chelsea.
Stamford Bridge masterplan will dictate Chelsea’s future ownership
It has been over six months since a rift in the Chelsea boardroom was first reported, with stories at the time suggesting that it would eventually lead either Boehly or Eghbali to sell their shares.
The Chelsea Chronicle has been reporting for some time that the future of Stamford Bridge is one of the main differences between the two co-owners.
An infographic contrasting Chelsea's matchday income at Stamford Bridge with that of their Premier League rivals, overlaid against a general image of the stadium
Chelsea matchday income and planned stadium capacity infographic Photo by Warren Little/Getty Images
Now, Boehly has confirmed as much in his interview with Bloomberg.
“We have a big stadium development opportunity that we have to flesh out,” he told the financial outlet. “I think that’s going to be where we’re either aligned or we ultimately decide to go different ways.”
Boehly wants to take Chelsea to a new location at Earl’s Court, whereas Eghbali wants to remain on the existing site and expand Stamford Bridge.
Either way, once the redevelopment or new stadium is complete, Chelsea will boast a capacity of over 60,000. In a Premier League marketplace increasingly focused on matchday income, that is just as well.
Chart showing Chelsea's matchday income compared to an average of the so-called Big Six
Chelsea matchday income compared to ‘Big Six’ average Credit: Adam Williams/The Chelsea Chronicle/GRV Media
Chelsea earn more on a per-fan basis than every other Premier League club, but the relatively modest size of Stamford Bridge is limiting.
And with Manchester United set to build Europe’s biggest stadium, Liverpool, Manchester City and Spurs all having reached over 60,000, and Arsenal looking at a rebuild too, Chelsea can’t afford to stand still.
Takeover latest: Could Todd Boehly flip Chelsea for a profit?
In the aforementioned Bloomberg interview, Boehly also insisted that Chelsea are worth more now than when the consortium he led paid £2.5bn for the club in May 2022.
Essentially, Boehly thinks he could make a profit if he was to sell Chelsea, or his stake in it, tomorrow.
“Has the enterprise value of Chelsea increased? Possibly,” says University of Liverpool football finance lecturer Kieran Maguire, speaking exclusively to The Chelsea Chronicle.
How Chelsea rank among sport’s most valuable teams
Rank Club Value 1-yr change Owners
17 Manchester United $6.2B +4% Glazer family
18 Real Madrid $6.06B +16% Club members
35 FC Barcelona $5.28B +7% Club members
40 Liverpool $5.11B +8% Fenway Sports Group
46 Bayern Munich $4.8B +8% Club members
51 Manchester City $4.75B +7% Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan
61 Paris Saint-Germain $4.05B +19% Qatar Sports Investment
65 Arsenal $3.91B +9% Stan Kroenke
74 Tottenham Hotspur $3.49B +9% Joe Lewis family trust, Daniel Levy
75 Chelsea $3.47B ±0% Todd Boehley, Clearlake Capital
Source: Sportico top 100 most valuable clubs
“But that is to do with broader market issues as opposed to anything specifically to do with Chelsea.
“It’s a bit like saying ‘my house is run down but all the houses in the locality have gone up by 20 per cent, so I am riding somebody else’s wave.’
“So, I think it’s a little disingenuous of Todd Boehly to imply that it is his decision making that has contributed to the value.
Photo by Robin Jones/Getty Images
Photo by Robin Jones/Getty Images
“The enterprise value may have gone up. Enterprise value is the business assets part of the club balance sheets.
“If you then take away the debt element, it could be that the equity value of the club has decreased.
“So, there are ways of playing with numbers with regards to club value and this appears to be one of them.”