Fenway Sports Group believe there is an opportunity to restore Malaga to the upper echelons of the Spanish and European game and there is huge potential for the only professional team in Spain’s sixth-largest city with a population of around 600,000.
The team also has a loyal fan base — even when playing in the third tier last season, attendances at its rustic La Rosaleda stadium regularly topped 20,000. That strong support helped the team, coached by long-time club servant Sergio Pellicer, to get promoted back to Segunda in 2023-24, despite the ongoing off-pitch turmoil.
Malaga is also a well-known tourist destination, and the Costa del Sol area is home to a wealthy expat community, bringing opportunities for VIP matchday revenues and international marketing.
Fenway Sports Group is routinely held up as an exceptionally valuable sporting empire, with Forbes pricing the group at $12.95billion in 2024, pitching them as the world’s third-most valuable sporting group at the time.
A little under half of that amount was attributable to Liverpool, and during their time at the helm FSG have restored the Anfield outfit from a dire financial position to one of fairly rude health, especially by the exacting standards of English football. Across FSG’s time on Merseyside, Liverpool have pretty much broken even, and The Athletic expects the club to post a profit in 2024-25, alongside breaking the £700million revenue barrier (the only other English to have done so to date is Manchester City).
Liverpool benefited from £127.3m in owner funding last season, though it came via FSG selling a stake in the business to Dynasty Equity. It is believed, though not certain, the stake sold was only in FSG Football, rather than the wider group. If so, that valued the football arm — which at this stage is effectively just Liverpool — at £4.24bn. That’s more than 18 times what FSG bought the club for in October 2010, and not too far shy of that Forbes valuation.
Sitting on a valuable asset doesn’t necessarily mean FSG is cash-rich, and in truth they’ve been fairly tight with the purse strings at Anfield. That £127.3m injection was the first time since 2015-16 that Liverpool had received funding from their owners and across their time in charge, the total amount the club has received from on high is £263.6m, a long way behind several other English clubs. Yet that’s more a product of the sustainability model FSG have employed than any inability to fund Liverpool.
In their first six years at the club, FSG injected £173.3m in cash, providing the funding needed to get the club moving in the right direction and, crucially in the long term, to support development at Anfield.
How much would need to be spent at Malaga?
A look at the wage bills of the Segunda’s recently promoted clubs is instructive of how much might need to be spent at Malaga to propel the club back into La Liga. In the last three years, seven of nine clubs promoted to the top tier have done so with staff costs between €14m and €30m, though one of the outliers was Espanyol, who were promoted last season with a €44.5m wage bill. Espanyol benefited from a €25.4m La Liga distribution that included Spain’s equivalent of a parachute payment. By comparison, the rest of the second tier received €5-7m from the league (in 2022-23, Malaga’s distribution was €6m).
FSG would have to contend with clubs with greater turnover than Malaga but the gulf is not so large as if they were to buy, say, an EFL Championship club in England. The likelihood of meaningful profit in Spain’s second tier is slim, but the uplift in Malaga’s value were they to get back to La Liga — and stay there — could be significant.
Importantly, any would-be buyer of Malaga will benefit from already strong support. Those high third-tier attendances were a big part of the club’s finances not nosediving, and the size of the local population makes for an obvious growth area.
Benefits for Liverpool
Where Liverpool would be more likely to benefit is behind the scenes. By bringing a club from mainland Europe under their control, FSG could more easily put boots on the ground from a scouting perspective. Warm-weather training, that favoured mid-season voyage of many clubs, would presumably be made a lot cheaper for Liverpool if their owners had ready access to facilities in the south of Spain.
Be it Malaga or anyone else that FSG choose to take the plunge with, Liverpool will remain the jewel in the group’s footballing crown. Liverpool fans need not worry about their side falling down the priority list. More likely any multi-club venture undertaken by FSG would be done so in the hope of improving Liverpool’s lot.
That being said, any purchase would necessarily require investment in the early stages, much as the buying of Liverpool did. FSG doubtless have the resources to do whatever they choose in that regard, but any Liverpool fans hoping they’ll change tack and start pouring money into their club are likely to be disappointed. The buying up of other clubs would make a move away from Liverpool’s sustainable model even less likely than it already is.
Of course, lots of clubs are doing well without following the Manchester City multi-club model, but it is becoming increasingly fashionable.
Labels
Fenway Sports Group La Liga Liverpool FC Malaga Premier League
West Bromwich Albion had effectively been in decline ever since the club was sold to a Chinese consortium in August 2016, paying a figure north of £200m to buy former owner Jeremy Peace’s stake. Controlling shareholder Guochuan Lai’s ownership was fairly disastrous for the club, but his unloved tenure finally came to an end after Bilkul Football WBA, a company ultimately owned by Florida-based entrepreneur Shilen Patel and his father Dr Kiran Patel, acquired an 87.8% shareholding in West Bromwich Albion Group Limited, the parent company of West Bromwich Albion Football Club. This change in ownership was urgently required, due to the numerous financial problems facing West Brom, including growing high-interest debt and serious cash flow concerns, following years of no investment from the former owner. Indeed, West Brom’s auditors had already rung the alarm bell in the 2021/22 accounts when they cast doubt on the club’s ability to continue as a going concern without making player s...
Tottenham Hotspur is in talks to sell a minority stake in a deal that could value it at up to £3.75 billion and pave the way for Joe Lewis and his family to sever ties with the Premier League football club. Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy is seeking an investment that values the club at between £3.5 billion and £3.75 billion, including debt. While the terms of any deal have not been finalised, City sources expect Spurs to sell about 10 per cent. The club is being advised by bankers from Rothschild on the sale. Tottenham wants to raise fresh capital for new player signings and to help fund the development of an academy for its women’s team, as well as a 30-storey hotel next to its north London stadium. The financier Amanda Staveley, who brokered the deal for Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to take over Newcastle United, is understood to be among the parties to have expressed an interest in Tottenham. Staveley’s fund, PCP Capital Partners, has raised about £500 million to ...
Millwall’s season was overshadowed by the tragic death of owner John Berylson following a car accident. The American had been an exemplary owner, beloved by the fans for his leadership, passion and generosity. Millwall’s finances had been pretty good during his tenure, which we shall explore by looking at the most recent accounts from the 2022/23 season, when the club narrowly missed out on a place in the play-offs after finishing 8th. Millwall’s pre-tax loss slightly reduced from £12.6m to £12.2m, as revenue rose £0.8m (4%) from £18.6m to a club record £19.4m and player sales improved from a £0.1m loss to £2.5m profit. However, other operating income dropped from by £1.1m from £1.3m to £0.2m, while operating expenses increased £1.7m (5%) from £31.6m to £33.3m. The main driver of the revenue increase was broadcasting, which rose £1.1m (12%) from £9.1m to £10.2m, though match day was also up £0.4m (7%) from £5.8m to £6.2m. In contrast, commercial fell £0.7m (19%) from £3.7m to £3....