In a significant move for its military modernization, Colombian President Gustavo Petro announced that the Fuerza Aeroespacial Colombiana, the nation’s air force, will acquire Saab Gripen E/F fighter jets from Sweden to replace its aging fleet of Israeli-made IAI Kfir aircraft.
SAAB is ready to produce 25 Gripen-E jets per year for India
Photo credit: SAAB
The announcement, made via social media, marks a pivotal shift for Colombia as it seeks to bolster its aerial capabilities amid regional tensions and domestic security challenges. While specifics such as the number of units and the total cost remain undisclosed, the decision signals a departure from decades of reliance on older technology and opens a new chapter in Colombia’s defense strategy.
The choice of the Gripen, a modern multirole fighter, over competing options like the American F-16 or the French Rafale, has sparked curiosity about the geopolitical and operational implications for this South American nation.
Después de la carta de intención firmada por el gobierno del Reino de Suecia, y de aprobar la defensa aérea estratégica del país como proyecto priorizado informo:
Los flota de aviones que se adquirirá, es completamente nueva, ultima tecnología, ya implementada en Brasil, y son…
— Gustavo Petro (@petrogustavo) April 2, 2025
The news broke when Petro took to X, stating that the Colombian Air Force would soon integrate the advanced Swedish aircraft into its ranks, a move confirmed by posts from defense-focused accounts like SA Defensa. For years, Colombia has grappled with the limitations of its Kfir fleet, which entered service in the late 1980s and has since become increasingly costly to maintain.
The decision to transition to the Gripen E/F comes after prolonged deliberation, with Bogotá weighing offers from multiple global manufacturers. This acquisition is not just about replacing outdated hardware; it reflects a broader ambition to enhance Colombia’s sovereignty in a region marked by instability, particularly with neighboring Venezuela, which operates Russian-built Su-30MKV jets.
To understand the significance of this choice, it’s worth delving into what the Saab Gripen E/F brings to the table. Developed by Swedish aerospace company Saab AB, the Gripen is a single-engine, multirole fighter designed for versatility, cost-efficiency, and adaptability.
The E/F variant, the latest iteration, boasts a top speed of Mach 2—approximately 1,500 miles per hour—and a combat radius exceeding 800 miles without refueling. Its General Electric F414 engine, an American-made component, delivers 22,000 pounds of thrust, enabling rapid response and sustained operations.
The aircraft’s standout feature is its active electronically scanned array radar, known as AESA, which provides superior detection and tracking capabilities over vast distances, even against stealthy targets.
Coupled with advanced electronic warfare systems, the Gripen can jam enemy sensors and protect itself in contested airspace. It carries a diverse payload, including air-to-air missiles like the Meteor and air-to-ground munitions such as precision-guided bombs, making it a flexible tool for both defense and offense.
Unlike heavier fighters like the American F-35 or Russia’s Su-35, the Gripen is lightweight, tipping the scales at around 17,600 pounds empty, which contributes to its low operational costs—estimated at roughly $4,000 per flight hour compared to the F-35’s $44,000.
This affordability is a key selling point for nations like Colombia, where budget constraints often dictate military planning. The aircraft’s design also allows it to operate from short, rugged airstrips, a critical advantage in Colombia’s diverse terrain of jungles, mountains, and remote border regions.
Saab has emphasized that the Gripen can be refueled and rearmed in under 20 minutes by a small ground crew, enhancing its readiness for rapid deployment—a feature that aligns with Colombia’s need to patrol vast, hard-to-reach areas prone to narco-trafficking and insurgent activity.
Colombia’s selection of the Gripen over the widely exported F-16, produced by Lockheed Martin, or the Dassault Rafale from France, raises questions about the strategic calculus behind the decision. The F-16, for instance, has a storied history, with over 4,500 units built since the 1970s and a presence in more than 25 countries.
It offers proven interoperability with NATO forces and a robust supply chain, advantages that might have appealed to a nation long aligned with the United States through initiatives like Plan Colombia, a multibillion-dollar effort to combat drug cartels and leftist guerrillas.
The Rafale, meanwhile, brings stealth-evading capabilities and a reputation for independence from U.S. components, potentially appealing to a leader like Petro, who has at times criticized American influence in Latin America. Yet, Bogotá opted for the Swedish contender, suggesting a blend of practical and political motivations.
One lens through which to view this choice is the regional balance of power. South America is not a hotbed of conventional warfare, but tensions simmer beneath the surface, particularly between Colombia and Venezuela.
Caracas has leaned heavily on Moscow for military support, fielding a squadron of Su-30MKV fighters—twin-engine heavyweights with a combat radius of nearly 1,900 miles and the ability to carry advanced anti-ship and air-to-ground weapons.
These aircraft give Venezuela a formidable edge in the air, a reality that Bogotá cannot ignore given the two nations’ fraught history, including border disputes and ideological clashes. The Gripen E/F, while lighter and less heavily armed than the Su-30, offers Colombia a modern counterweight, capable of engaging threats at long range and maintaining air superiority over its territory.
Posts on X from users like DalgonaMac have hailed the decision as a smart fit for Colombia’s needs, arguing that the Gripen’s agility and cost-effectiveness make it ideal for deterring Venezuelan aggression without breaking the bank.
Beyond the immediate neighborhood, this acquisition could signal a subtle realignment in Colombia’s foreign policy. Petro, a leftist who took office in 2022, has charted a course distinct from his predecessors, emphasizing sovereignty and diversification of international partnerships.
Choosing a Swedish jet over an American one might reflect a desire to reduce dependence on Washington, a longtime ally whose reliability as a trade partner has come under scrutiny in some Latin American circles. As SergioGuzmanE noted on X, the F-16 offer likely included more aircraft and faster delivery timelines, yet Petro’s administration appears to have prioritized a deal that sidesteps deeper entanglement with U.S. interests.
Sweden, a neutral player with no colonial baggage in the region, presents a less politically charged option, while Brazil’s existing Gripen program—36 jets ordered in 2014, with plans for expansion—offers a potential regional partner for maintenance and training.
The technological implications of this shift are equally compelling. The Gripen E/F isn’t just a standalone aircraft; it’s a node in a networked battlefield. Its data-link systems allow it to share real-time information with other units, creating a force multiplier effect that could transform how the Colombian Air Force operates.
In a country where counterinsurgency and border surveillance are paramount, this capability could prove invaluable. Imagine a scenario where Gripen jets, patrolling the dense Amazonian frontier, relay coordinates of a narco airstrip to ground forces or drones, enabling precise strikes without delay.
Saab has also hinted at industrial cooperation, with Brazil’s Embraer already producing components for its Gripen fleet at a facility in São Paulo state. Colombia could tap into this ecosystem, potentially establishing itself as a secondary hub for Gripen support in Latin America, a prospect that would boost local jobs and technical expertise.
Yet, the deal is not without its uncertainties, and one looming question is the role of the United States. The Gripen’s F414 engine, manufactured by General Electric, falls under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, or ITAR, which govern the export of U.S. military technology.
Washington has the power to veto the sale of these engines to Colombia, a move that could derail the entire agreement. Historical precedent exists: in 2019, the U.S. suspended Turkey from the F-35 program after Ankara purchased Russian S-400 air defense systems, citing security risks.
More recently, reports from outlets like Caliber.az suggest that the U.S. blocked a Gripen sale to Colombia in March, though Saab denied the claim at the time. If true, such interference could stem from a desire to protect Lockheed Martin’s market share or to keep Colombia firmly within the American orbit, especially given Petro’s occasional anti-U.S. rhetoric.
The Trump administration might see the F-16 as a better fit for interoperability with U.S. forces, a priority in a region where joint counter-narcotics operations remain active.
Should a veto materialize, Colombia would face tough choices. Turning to non-Western suppliers like China, which offers the J-10C fighter, or Russia, with its MiG-35, would mark a dramatic break from decades of alignment with the West. The J-10C, a single-engine jet with a delta-wing design, mirrors the Gripen in some respects, boasting a top speed of Mach 1.8 and a modern AESA radar.
However, its operational history is shorter, and integration into Colombia’s U.S.-influenced military framework would be a logistical nightmare. Russia’s offerings, meanwhile, carry political baggage that Bogotá might prefer to avoid, given its rivalry with Venezuela.
A more likely fallback would be the Rafale, which lacks U.S. components but comes with a higher price tag—around $120 million per unit versus the Gripen’s $85 million—potentially straining Colombia’s finances.
Domestically, the Gripen purchase fits into Petro’s broader agenda. His administration has prioritized tackling internal threats like drug trafficking and illegal mining, issues that have long plagued rural Colombia. The Kfir fleet, while valiant, struggled to keep pace, with maintenance costs soaring as spare parts grew scarce.
Israel Aerospace Industries, the Kfir’s manufacturer, signed a deal in early 2025 to extend the jets’ lifespan, but this was a stopgap measure. The Gripen, with its lower upkeep costs and modern sensors, promises a more sustainable solution, allowing the Air Force to focus resources on missions rather than repairs.
Economically, the question of funding looms large. Colombia’s defense budget, roughly $10 billion annually, is modest by global standards, and analysts speculate that Sweden might offer favorable credit terms, as it did with Brazil, or that Bogotá could leverage international loans to cover the multibillion-dollar price tag.
Looking back, Colombia’s air force has evolved through distinct phases. In the 1950s, it flew American P-47 Thunderbolts during the Korean War as part of a United Nations coalition, cementing ties with Washington. The Kfir arrived in 1989, a purchase driven by the need to counter FARC guerrillas and secure airspace during the height of the drug wars.
By the early 2000s, these jets were instrumental in operations like the 2008 bombing of a FARC camp in Ecuador, a controversial strike that showcased their precision but also their age. The transition to the Gripen reflects a new era, one where external deterrence and internal security must coexist in a modernized force.
The ripple effects of this decision could extend beyond Colombia’s borders. Peru, which operates aging Mirage 2000s and MiG-29s, has eyed the Gripen as a replacement, and a successful Colombian program might tip the scales. Ecuador, too, could take note, potentially sparking a mini-arms race in the Andes.
For Saab, the deal is a lifeline. After losing bids to the F-35 in countries like Finland and Canada, the Swedish firm has staked its future on the Gripen E/F, with Brazil as its flagship customer. A foothold in Colombia could open doors across Latin America, challenging the dominance of U.S. and European giants like Lockheed Martin and Dassault.
In the end, Colombia’s embrace of the Gripen E/F is more than a hardware upgrade—it’s a statement of intent. It positions Bogotá as a player in a shifting regional landscape, balancing pragmatism with ambition. The aircraft’s arrival promises to reshape how the nation defends its skies, offering a blend of cutting-edge technology and economic sensibility.
Yet, the specter of a U.S. veto lingers, a reminder that global powers still hold sway over even the most independent-minded deals. As the details emerge and the jets take flight, the question remains: will this be a turning point for Colombia’s military autonomy or a fleeting victory overshadowed by Washington’s long reach? Only time will tell, but for now, the skies over Bogotá are poised for change.
***
Follow us everywhere and at any time. BulgarianMilitary.com has responsive design and you can open the page from any computer, mobile devices or web browsers. For more up-to-date news, follow our Google News, YouTube, Reddit, LinkedIn, and Twitter pages. Our standards: Manifesto & ethical principles.