kansascity.com

Ethics panel says source of funds for mayor’s trips deserved more transparency

Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas holds up the Vince Lombardi Trophy after Chiefs coach Andy Reid handed it to him at Kansas City International Airport on Monday. The Kansas City Chiefs returned home after defeating the Philadelphia Eagles in Super Bowl LVII in Glendale, Ariz. Travis Heying The Wichita Eagle

Kansas City should amend its ethics code to address the transparency issues that arose when a nonprofit group under Mayor Quinton Lucas’ control paid for his trip to the 2023 Super Bowl, according to a new report.

The Municipal Officials and Officers Ethics Commission found nothing illegal or improper in the investigation it began after a news outlet reported that the Mayors Corps of Progress for a Greater Kansas City covered the nearly $24,000 cost of sending Lucas, an aide and his security detail to Phoenix for the game between the Chiefs and Eagles.

The nonprofit was formed years ago to provide financial support to the city’s mayors in their efforts to promote economic development in Kansas City. The Mayors Corps also paid to send Lucas to the Chiefs’ Super Bowl appearances in 2024 and 2025.

Lucas had been open about that. But as the Missouri Independent reported in December, the Mayors Corps was under no obligation to disclose the source of its funding.

A whistleblower told the news organization that a business advocacy group, the Heavy Constructors Association of Greater Kansas City, had donated the money to the Mayors Corps to cover the cost of the 2023 trip.

Super Bowl trip

As a nonprofit formed under 501(c)(4) of the federal tax code, the Mayors Corps does not have to report the source of its funds. The ethics commission says that raises transparency issues that can undermine the public’s trust in government and that other funding mechanisms should be used to pay for business trip not underwritten by taxpayers.

The Independent quoted experts who said the lack of disclosure raised ethical issues and questioned whether the donation was a violation of the city ethics code that limits the amount of gifts a city official can receive to no more than $1,000 each.

Lucas denied wrongdoing. He was on official business when he represented Kansas City at those Super Bowl appearances, he said, so the trips were not personal gifts. He said at the time that the financial support from the Mayors Corps relieved taxpayers from having to pay for those trips and others where his purpose was to promote the city.

“We’ve worked with lawyers, advisors and others to make sure that everything is on the up and up in connection with it,” Lucas told the Independent.

The ethics commission’s May 19 report supported the mayor’s interpretation, but offered suggestions on better ways to cover the cost of future trips.

Lucas said in a statement Friday that he welcomed the report’s findings. But he did not say he did not promise to follow its recommendations for more transparency other than he would continue to follow city requirements.

“I thank the Ethics Commission for their work and agree with their conclusion that trip reporting complied with our rules and guidance.” he said.

Ethics commission recommendations

The Mayors Corps of Progress is not an entity with “a substantial interest” in the city’s decision making that might benefit in trying influence city policy. If it were, then the financial support would have been an ethics violation, the commission said.

But in a memorandum addressed to City Council’s Finance, Governance and Public Safety Committee, the commission said greater transparency is needed.

The mayor’s trips could have been paid for through other means that would have disclosed the Heavy Constructors’ involvement, the commission said.

Donors could have offered direct payments to the city that the council would have needed to approve publicly, the report said.

Payments for trips also could come from the mayor’s political campaign committee, the report said. While it is illegal for an official to use campaign funds for personal use, the money can go to support an officeholders official duties. And donations to those committees are publicly disclosed, unlike those to the Mayors Corps for Progress.

Lucas’ political action committee is another possible vehicle that could be used in the future, the commission said.

“The United We Stand PAC is reportedly associated with Mayor Lucas,” the report said. “The Missouri Ethics Commission recognizes the propriety of spending campaign funds on expenses incurred by an office holder if the expenses are “ordinary and necessary” to the performance of the office holder’s duties.”

The finance committee’s next meeting is on June 3. The report asked that the committee consider amending the city code’s section on gifts to public officials to reflect the report’s suggestions.

The Kansas City Star

816-234-4738

Mike Hendricks covers local government for The Kansas City Star. Previously he covered business, agriculture and was on the investigations team. For 14 years, he wrote a metro column three times a week. His many honors include two Gerald Loeb awards.

Read full news in source page