One thing about the NFL that is underappreciated in today’s sports landscape is its constant effort to keep the game fair, both on and off the field. Unlike other leagues like the NBA and MLB, which have no problem allowing big-market teams to seize unfair financial advantages, the NFL has worked hard to give franchises in smaller markets a chance to compete. It has certainly worked out pretty well. The Green Bay Packers, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Atlanta Falcons, and Baltimore Ravens have all had tremendous success recently because the league instituted a salary cap in the 1990s. That meant the bigger market teams couldn’t simply outspend them. Now, another potential rule change may benefit the Chicago Bears.
One thing about professional sports is that organizations always look for an edge, whether on the field or off. One tactic many have begun employing is the use of void years in player contracts. These are designed to allow teams to spread the cost of signing bonuses and other salary cap charges over a longer period than the actual duration of the player’s contract. Some believe this gives teams with richer owners an unfair advantage since they can skirt the cap through cash flow.
Commissioner Roger Goodell revealed that discussions are being held about addressing this problem. Changes could be coming in the next Collective Bargaining Agreement.
NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said owners had a lengthy discussion at the league meetings about the salary cap system — how well it’s working, whether teams are operating within its intended spirit, and what changes might be needed in the next round of collective bargaining with… pic.twitter.com/qYxDF9cbMi
— Ari Meirov (@MySportsUpdate) May 25, 2025
Subscribe to the BFR Youtube channel and ride shotgun with Dave and Ficky as they break down Bears football like nobody else.
Translation – the league is likely concerned that cash rich owners use void years and rolling option bonuses to continuously push contracts higher and higher in terms of cash flow, but lower in terms of cap hits, and "poorer" owners can't really replicate that. https://t.co/TxDtK3Ps25
— Brett Kollmann (@BrettKollmann) May 25, 2025
The Chicago Bears would be a huge beneficiary of this outcome.
If you’re looking for proof that the void year problem is directly correlated to richer owners, just look at the statistics from last year. Four of the teams in the top 10 for most void money feature owners who are among the ten richest in the league: Stephen Ross (Miami), Woody Johnson (Jets), Jerry Jones (Dallas), and Shahid Khan (Jacksonville). The Glazer Family (Tampa Bay) ranked 11th.
Most cap dollars currently in void years:
1. PHI (duh): $390.4M
2. SF: $204.1M
3. CLE: $187.5M
4. NO: $112.1M
5. JAX:$106.55M
6. NYJ: $87.6M
7. MIA: $70.6M
8. DAL: $62.755M
9. TB: $56.1M
10. DET: $52.1M
11. BAL: $50.8M
12. HOU: $47.09M
13. MIN: $47.08M
14. DEN: $40.3M
— Nick Korte (@nickkorte) February 12, 2025
The Chicago Bears are one of the least cash-rich owners in the NFL, with a total worth of just $1.3 billion. Their entire fortune is tied to the team. That is likely why they have no void years in any of their contracts outside of Ryan Bates, which they got in a trade from Buffalo.
On the other end, the Patriots & Giants have no contracts with any void years.
The Bears & Steelers have no cap dollars in void years, and their only contracts that have void years were acquired by trade:
•Ryan Bates: BUF→CHI
•Preston Smith: GB→PIT
•Mike Williams: NYJ→PIT
— Nick Korte (@nickkorte) February 12, 2025
If the NFL finds a way to slam the door shut on the void years loophole, it would force the richer teams in the league to be more beholden to the salary cap like everybody else. It restores parity and keeps things competitive. That helps the Bears.