But what of that newly hallowed pitch? Have the groundsmen brought with them their famous "Keep Off The Grass" signs from Goodison Park?
It has become a truism of modern football that the playing surface is a key part of the Premier League product. The days of natural grass pitches that ripped up to form ugly mudbaths in the depths of winter are happily a distant memory, replaced by pristine carpets of green that are meant to facilitate the fast-paced, high-intensity game we now crave to see.
At the heart of this revolution is a fascinating and complex technology: hybrid turf. But as Everton prepare to start life in earnest at the new Hill Dickinson Stadium, a curious story has emerged that asks a difficult question: is this technological marvel as flawless as we'd like to believe?
The concept of hybrid turf is simple yet ingenious. It's a blend of natural grass and synthetic fibres, designed to give clubs and players the best of both worlds. Traditional natural grass, for all its aesthetic beauty and "feel" benefits, is fragile. It tears, it divots, and it quickly becomes unplayable with heavy use or poor weather.
Artificial pitches, while durable, are often criticized for their different playing characteristics, and more recently, for their potential to increase injury risk. Hybrid pitches, such as the SISGrass or Desso GrassMaster systems used at many Premier League grounds, aim to achieve a compromise that preserves the appearance and finish of a mown grass sward, while giving it hidden inner strength and resiliency to resist a battering from boots and studs.
The process is a marvel of engineering. A natural grass pitch is grown on a specially prepared sub-base but, before the final seeding, millions of synthetic fibres, typically polypropylene, are stitched vertically into the soil. These fibres, which are only a few centimetres long, are injected deep into the rootzone by computer-controlled machines. As the grass grows, its roots intertwine with these synthetic strands, creating a dense, interlocking matrix. This reinforcement has a number of significant benefits:
Enhanced Durability: The synthetic fibres act as a kind of internal scaffolding, preventing the grass from tearing out in chunks. This means the pitch can withstand far more usage — training sessions, multiple games, and concerts — without degrading.
Improved Stability: Players benefit from a more stable and consistent surface, reducing the risk of a foot "slipping" or getting caught in a divot. The ball roll is truer and more predictable.
Superior Drainage: The reinforced rootzone is better at handling heavy rainfall, as the stitching helps maintain the integrity of the drainage layers beneath.
Faster Recovery: A damaged area of the pitch can regenerate more quickly because the underlying structure remains intact.
This technology has become the gold standard. Every Premier League club now uses a form of hybrid pitch, and the system is ubiquitous at elite venues across Europe. It’s a testament to the success of the technology that the debate has moved from "should we use it?" to "which system is best?"
Which brings us to the new Hill Dickinson Stadium, and the peculiar tale of the pitch. Earlier in the year, as the stadium neared its completion, it was announced that the new SIS hybrid pitch, installed specifically for the initial test events, was to be dug up and re-laid!
The club's official statement from April 2025 framed this as a planned "refurbishment" — identical to the yearly maintenance at Goodison Park. They explained that the pitch was grown over winter for the test events and would be removed to allow for the growth of a "world-class" surface during the more favourable spring conditions.
However, a different narrative has surfaced behind the scenes. Whispers in the media and on fan forums suggest that the decision was not simply about seasonal growing cycles. There were reportedly concerns from players and coaching staff about the surface's firmness and potential to cause injury. While there is no official confirmation of this, it's a topic that demands a closer look.
The potential for injury on hybrid surfaces is a complex and often debated subject. While many studies have shown that modern third-generation artificial pitches do not have a significantly higher injury rate than natural grass, the data on hybrid pitches is more difficult to parse.
The key lies in the interaction between the player's boot and the surface. When a player plants their foot to change direction, the shear force on their ligaments — particularly the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in the knee and the ligaments in the ankle — is immense.
Some research has indicated that artificial or hybrid surfaces can have a higher rotational traction than natural grass, meaning the boot is less likely to slide and more likely to lock into the ground. This can transfer the shearing force up the leg, increasing the strain on the knee and ankle.
Furthermore, the firmness of the surface is a critical factor. An overly hard pitch, even with its reinforced structure, can increase the impact on a player's joints and lead to overuse injuries.
So, could the initial Hill Dickinson Stadium pitch have been too "tight" or too hard? Was the weave of the synthetic fibres too dense, or the underlying soil mixture not quite right? These are the questions that circulate, and they are not without merit.
The grounds staff, in their meticulous pursuit of a perfect playing surface, must find a delicate balance between durability and player safety. A pitch that is too soft and easily cut up is a problem… but one that is too unyielding and unforgiving can be even more dangerous.
The decision to completely re-lay the pitch at the new stadium, rather than simply undertaking a routine refurbishment, hints at a more fundamental issue. It suggests that the initial construction or layering of the surface, in some way, failed to meet the exacting standards required for a top-tier Premier League pitch.
While the club's official stance is that the work was always planned, the timing and extent of the intervention, as well as the unofficial chatter, strongly suggest that player welfare was a major factor.
As the Everton team prepares to move into their new home, we can be confident that the pitch they finally play on will be as good as it gets. It will be the result of a multi-million-pound investment in the latest hybrid technology, meticulously cared for by an expert team.
But the brief, unsettling tale of the first pitch serves as a valuable reminder that, even in an era of incredible technological advancement, the human element — the subtle, tactile relationship between a player's boot and the ground beneath their feet remains the most important variable of all.
Note: the following content is not moderated or vetted by the site owners at the time of submission. Comments are the responsibility of the poster. Disclaimer ()
Editorial Team
Posted 07/08/2025 at 09:32:54
This article was prompted by some comments posted a few days ago. I might copy a couple of them over if I can find them.
I was a bit hesitant initially as I suspected it would be another one of these wonderful scouse fear-mongering portents of doom — like the solid claim that the stadium would not be ready and Everton had already requested to play their first three games away from home.
No doubt the true story will never be revealed, however, so take it or leave it!
How to get rid of these ads and support TW
© ToffeeWeb