How were the Chelsea players rated after the horrendous performances against Crystal Palace, they should have actually lost?
Rated:
Chelsea players were rated after the bad performance against Crystal Palace. It was expected for them to win this match and there is no doubt about it either. They were able to defeat Patis Saint Germain. This is why they could have easily defeated Crystal Palace. However, Crystal Palace is a really very strong team at the moment. They have recently defeated Liverpool as well.
Robert Sanchez was okay to be honest. Also, He did not do anything really extra ordinary to be honest. His rating was 6 out of 10.
Reece James was very mediocre in this match and that is why his rating was 5 out of 10.
Acheampong on the other hand won a lot of duels and at the same time, he did a lot of great tackles too. Also, There is no doubt that Acheampong really performed very well for Chelsea to be honest. His rating was 9 out of 10.
Chalobah performed very well. However, he was overshadowed to be honest. His rating was 7 out of 10.
Marc Cucurella was 6 out of 10. He was not that bad for Chelsea to be honest.
Caicedo was 6 out of 10. Enzo Fernandez was 5 out of 10. Cole Palmer also performed very horrendous and his rating was 5 out of 10 as well.
Pedro Neto rating was 7 out of 10.
Joao Pedro also performed very mediocre and his rating was 5 out of 10 to be honest.
Jamie Gittens was 5 out of 10 as well.
Author’s Opinion:
I think Chelsea did not perform well at all. Crystal Palace should have won to be honest. They were the better side all along.
Comment down below your thoughts on How were the Chelsea players rated after the horrendous performances against Crystal Palace, they should have actually lost?
Recommended for you