manchestereveningnews.co.uk

Sir Jim Ratcliffe's possible FA punishment and timeline as Man United chief speaks out

Sir Jim Ratcliffe has come under fire for his recent comments in the media regarding immigration, with the FA scrutinising his words to decide on whether he broke football rules

Sir Jim Ratcliffe looks on

Sir Jim Ratcliffe has been lambasted for comments on immigration(Image: PA)

View Image

The FA are said to be looking into whether Sir Jim Ratcliffe broke footballing rules with his claims that the UK has been "colonised" by immigrants. The British Manchester United co-owner, who resides in Monaco, caused widespread uproar with his comments, with Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, even calling for an apology.

Now, the FA have stepped in to identify whether Ratcliffe has breached any guidelines. Ratcliffe told Sky News on Wednesday: "You can’t afford...you can’t have an economy with 9 million people on benefits and huge levels of immigrants coming in. The UK is being colonised by immigrants, really, isn’t it?"

As per the Football Associations rules, 'there are no set sanctions for media comments or social networking comments cases.' However, the guidelines do state that financial penalties are the 'most usual' form of sanction for such cases.

With regards to the timeline in which the FA could take to reach a verdict, the guide adds: "The FA will seek written observations or issue a Participant with a charge within three working days of the comments/posting being brought to the attention of The FA.

"A Participant will have three working days to provide any requested observations. The FA will have three working days from the deadline for the provision of observations to decide whether to issue any disciplinary charge.

"The Participant will have three working days to reply to any charge. The Regulatory Commission hearing will take place within ten working days of receipt of the Reply."

As a result, Ratcliffe could be charged by the FA by Monday at the latest - given the interview took place on Wednesday. As a result of national criticism over Ratcliffe's interview, Labour leader Starmer urged the Ineos chief to apologise while explaining that Britain is a "proud, tolerant and diverse country."

FOLLOW OUR MAN UNITED FB PAGE! Latest news and analysis via the MEN’s Manchester United Facebook page

Elsewhere, the Manchester United Supporters Trust quickly condemned the 73-year-old's comments, writing on X: "No fan should feel excluded from following or supporting the club because of their race, religion, nationality or background. Comments from the club's senior leadership should make inclusion easier, not harder.

"This is not about politics; it is about ensuring that the custodians of Manchester United act in a way that unites supporters rather than marginalising any part of our fanbase."

Now, Ratcliffe has finally issued a statement, clarifying what he meant by his words. He explained on Thursday: "I am sorry that my choice of language has offended some people in the UK and Europe and caused concern but it is important to raise the issue of controlled and well-managed immigration that supports economic growth.

"My comments were made while answering questions about UK policy at the European Industry Summit in Antwerp, where I was discussing the importance of economic growth, jobs, skills and manufacturing in the UK.

"My intention was to stress that governments must manage migration alongside investment in skills, industry and jobs so that long-term prosperity is shared by everyone. It is critical that we maintain an open debate on the challenges facing the UK."

Ensure our latest sport headlines always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as Preferred Source in your Google search settings.

Read full news in source page