As Tottenham Hotspur slide toward a relegation battle with a growing injury crisis and a brutal run of fixtures, this piece uses the numbers to show where points can still be found.
Introduction
On 21 May 2025, Tottenham Hotspur fans finally got the night they thought might never come. Years of drought ended, a real trophy was lifted, and it was not a domestic cup people forget in two weeks. It was Europe. Europa League winners. And on top of that, back into the Champions League after two seasons away, in an all English final against Manchester United.
It should have been a launch moment.
Instead, it became one of the strangest turning points I can remember. The narrative felt clear that night: Spurs kick on, United spiral. But football loves a swing. United used the lack of European football to reset, recruit, and push the culture hard, even if the transfer bar had been low for years and they still had holes. Tottenham Hotspur, on the other hand, did not build like a team that had just earned the right to level up. The window did not match the moment.
And the Europa League final hid something uncomfortable for both clubs. This was not a clash of giants in their prime. It was the 17th placed team in the Premier League against the 15th placed team in the Premier League, meeting in Europe while both were struggling at home.
After the final, Ruben Amorim owned it, took responsibility, and gave Spurs their flowers. United took it on the chin and moved forward. Spurs drifted.
The cracks had been showing for a while, but they were easier to ignore with a trophy in the hands and Champions League nights on the calendar. This season, those cracks have caught up. The injury list is ugly, the fixture list is even uglier, and suddenly the sentence that used to sound impossible is now being said out loud.
Surely Tottenham Hotspur cannot get relegated.
But “surely” is not a plan.
So let’s look at what the numbers are saying, where the danger is really coming from, and what has to change if Spurs want points instead of excuses.
Spurs Defensive Profile
Spurs need to improve their defensive outputs. They allow too many shots, concede too many goals, and the first step to stabilising results is increasing clean sheet frequency. Below, I focus on open play non penalty shots conceded, split by home and away, to identify the main patterns behind the chances they give up.
Home: Where Spurs Are Getting Hurt
A lot has been said about Tottenham Hotspur’s home form. A home ground should tilt tight moments in your favour, but Spurs have regularly had games where the stadium does not translate into control, especially in matches that become open and transitional. This section looks at the shots they concede at home to pinpoint the biggest defensive issues.
Open Play Shot Map Against (Home, Non Penalty)
What stands out immediately is the share of shots conceded in transition. Around 42 percent of all shots conceded at home are tagged as transition shots, which is a very high rate. The map also shows that many of these transition shots are not harmless efforts from distance, they are coming from inside the box and from central areas. That is why the goals conceded are concentrated around the penalty spot and the six yard corridor, with several high xG shots in prime locations.
A second clear pattern is chance creation via a pass. About 73 percent of the shots conceded at home are assisted, and the assist mix is dominated by crosses, with a meaningful cutback component. Visually, you see multiple deliveries and pull backs arriving into the middle of the box, which is where finishing probability is highest.
If you want one defensive takeaway from this plot, it is this: Spurs are conceding too many box entries and central shots after quick attacks and deliveries. The biggest improvement lever is reducing transition exposure by keeping more of the ball and improving box protection of the central lane, especially against crosses and cutbacks.
xG Conceded by Zone (Home, Open Play, Non Penalty)
This xG by zone view reinforces what the shot map shows. Spurs are conceding most of their expected goals from central areas inside the box, especially the zones in front of goal around the penalty spot and six yard corridor. It is not just that they allow shots, it is where those shots are coming from.
There is also a clear side tilt. The attacking left side (Spurs defending right) looks more vulnerable, with repeated shots and meaningful xG coming from that channel into the box. This suggests opponents are finding a consistent route to progress down that side and deliver into central finishing areas.
If Spurs want a fast defensive improvement at home, the priority is to reduce central box shots by protecting the middle first and improving how they defend the right side channel. That means earlier pressure on the wide receiver, better cover of the cutback lane, and tighter occupation of the central zone between the penalty spot and the six yard line.
Away: Similar Problems, Slight Shift in Supply
Away from home, Spurs show a similar concession profile. The volume stays high and the majority of danger still comes from central box shots created by a pass. Transition remains a major contributor, even if the share is slightly lower than at home. The away section below shows whether the route into the box changes and which channel looks most vulnerable.
Open Play Shot Map Against (Away, Non Penalty)
The away shot map shows the same core issue. Spurs concede a lot of shots from inside the box and many of the goals conceded come from central areas close to goal. Transition shots still make up a large share at around 37 percent, and many of those transition attempts are taken in the box rather than from distance, which keeps the concession profile dangerous.
Chance creation is again mainly pass led. About 72 percent of away shots conceded are assisted, with deliveries into the box driving most of the shot volume. The takeaway away from home is consistent with the home picture. Spurs are allowing opponents to reach crossing and cutback zones too often and then finish from central space.
xG Conceded by Zone (Away, Open Play, Non Penalty)
The away xG by zone map confirms that the highest value concessions are still concentrated in the central zones closest to goal. That concentration is important because it indicates a structural issue, not isolated mistakes. Spurs are repeatedly allowing shots from the most dangerous parts of the box.
Away, there also appears to be a slight shift in where the danger is arriving from. The heavier xG blocks suggest opponents are often progressing down their right channel and delivering into central areas. The defensive priority remains the same, but the emphasis away should be on stopping access to that supply lane, delaying the wide attack earlier, and protecting the central corridor in front of goal so that crosses and cutbacks do not turn into free finishes.
Conclusion
The data does not point to a single bad habit (maybe one of the habits Igor Tudor spoke about after the North London Derby), it points to a repeatable pattern. Spurs are conceding a high volume of shots, but more importantly they are conceding them from the wrong places. A large share arrive in transition, and many of those transition attacks end with shots inside the box. On top of that, most of the shots conceded are assisted, driven by deliveries into the area, mainly crosses with a consistent cutback threat. The result is predictable. Too many opponents reach crossing zones, too many passes arrive into central finishing lanes, and too many shots are taken from the six to twelve yard corridor.
Home and away look slightly different in the supply lane, but the weakness is the same. Spurs are not protecting the middle of the box well enough, and they are not slowing attacks early enough to let the box get set. If Spurs want to climb away from danger, they do not need a miracle. They need to reduce transition exposure, stop easy access to wide delivery zones, and protect the cutback lane and the central zone in front of goal. Clean sheets will not come from hope or narrative. They will come from making opponents take worse shots, from worse locations, less often.
Support the Journey & Grow With It
If you’ve made it this far, thank you. Your time and attention mean a lot.
If you’d like to support my work, you can:
Check out myPayhip store for exclusive football analytics resources
Explore the free**Football Analytics Starter Guide** on Medium
Revisit older Substack posts full of tools, insights, and lessons I wish I had when I started
If you’re working on something, need advice, or just want to connect, feel free to reach out.
And if you know of opportunities where my work could fit, I’m always open.
Let’s keep building, learning, and shaping the future of football analytics together.