Manchester United will always be more than a football club and that is why this process hurt despite the Red Devils announcing a positive set of financial results
United co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe
United co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe(Image: AFP via Getty Images)
View 2 Images
Sir Jim Ratcliffe's brutal cost-cutting off-the-pitch have turned Manchester United’s financial fortunes around. But there will always be a question over whether those ruthless decisions - including 450 job cuts - are worth the reputational damage to the club.
The club accounts show United made a striking £32.6m operating profit for the first six months of the year which is in stark contrast to a £3.9m loss in the same period last year.
That is some turnaround and United chief executive Omar Berrada described it as a “transformation” in terms of “profitability.”
But United will always be more than just a football club. It is a monster in the English game but also such a huge part of society and the community in Manchester and way beyond.
Never dismiss 450 as a number. Within that, it’s about families and lives. It matters and we should never turn a blind eye.
When the job cuts were made, staff benefits were slashed and ticket prices increased, it hurt because United always felt like the club of the people.
That idyllic vision has arguably long since disappeared for all clubs - not just United - but it struck more of a chord because United is the biggest club in English football.
We can argue all day about who is the biggest. You can make a case for Manchester City being the best. Or Liverpool. Or Arsenal. But United is the biggest.
That is why when United make cutbacks it really resonates and begs several questions: did they really need to do it? Would it have happened in Sir Alex Ferguson’s day? Is it a football club or a business?
The answer, whether we like it or not, is probably yes to all three. Football now finds itself in a position where even if clubs have billionaire backing they are not allowed to pump their money in even if they want to.
WOLVERHAMPTON, ENGLAND - DECEMBER 08: Sir Jim Ratcliffe, co-owner of Manchester United, speaks with Omar Berrada, chief-executive officer of Manchester United, during the Premier League match between Wolverhampton Wanderers and Manchester United at Molineux on December 08, 2025 in Wolverhampton, England. (Photo by James Gill - Danehouse/Getty Images)
Manchester United co-owner Jim Ratcliffe and CEO Omar Berrada(Image: James Gill - Danehouse, Getty Images)
View 2 Images
They have to be profitable, meet financial requirements and come into line. Even if it means long-standing staff from the tea lady to the programme seller lose their jobs which still feels impossible to justify.
United made tough decisions set against a background of Ratcliffe becoming public enemy No1 because fans like tradition, they like class and they want their club to maintain standards.
But, ultimately, the biggest barometer will be on the pitch. And while the club is failing on the pitch, unpopular decisions look even worse. If both aspects are failing then what is the point?
Now, finally, at least we are seeing an upturn on the pitch. United insist they will always put football first and have invested heavily in both the men’s and women’s teams.
The financial turnaround means they are in a strong position for when they do get back into the Champions League.
And, more immediately, they are chasing down a place in the top four thanks to Michael Carrick’s incredible turnaround.
While the cuts hurt, the results have returned. Both on and off the pitch - even if it was incredibly painful to get here.
Content cannot be displayed without consent