Sunderland have answered many questions about their new membership scheme, but the different tiers, ballots and extra charges still leave many supporters facing difficult choices
Success changes a football club. It changes expectations, transfer fees, wage bills and the determination to maximise every revenue stream. Sunderland are operating in a different world now, having spent heavily on Enzo Le Fée and Granit Xhaka, finished seventh in the Premier League and qualified for Europe.
Those ambitions have to be funded. Cost-control rules mean Sunderland must keep growing their income, while paid memberships are commonplace across the Premier League. The scheme itself is neither outrageous nor unusual.
We all enjoy seeing Sunderland sign major players, compete in Europe and show ambition. Increasing revenue is part of the hidden cost of that success, and most supporters will understand the club wanting to maximise income.
But something becoming normal does not automatically make every element fair, affordable or easy to understand. Sunderland are asking supporters to pay more, raising the question of where it ends.
Why the scheme feels complicated
Adult membership costs £48, Academy membership costs £30 for the first child and £20 for each additional child, while Season Ticket Plus costs season-ticket holders another £20. Adult and Academy members can enter home ballots, while Season Ticket Plus provides access to an away ballot covering 10 per cent of the general-admission allocation.
No tier includes both home and away ballots. Season Ticket Plus members cannot join the home ballot or waiting list, while Adult and Academy members cannot enter the away ballot. The distinctions become clearer once explained, but the different tiers and processes make the system feel convoluted. That complexity shaped the initial reaction. The phrase “cash grab” was used by some supporters, while others welcomed an opportunity to access tickets that might otherwise have remained beyond their reach.
A non-season-ticket holder may be delighted to enter a home ballot. A younger fan with no route into away games may see Season Ticket Plus as an opening. A long-standing travelling supporter, however, may view the away ballot as another squeeze on tickets they spent years building points to access.
Paying for the chance to buy
For many domestic supporters, the main attraction is the chance to buy a football ticket. Adult membership does not guarantee one for any particular fixture. It provides entry into a ballot, after which successful applicants must still purchase the ticket.
Some supporters will consider £48 reasonable value for home ballots, club content and the waiting list. Others will feel they are paying a tax on hope, particularly when they could previously wait for fixtures to reach general sale. Home tickets can still reach general sale, but only if any remain after the membership ballot. Given current demand, availability for the biggest games may be extremely limited. Families face a greater cumulative cost. One adult and two children could spend £98 on memberships before buying a ticket, arranging travel or paying for anything inside the stadium. In a city where many households must carefully choose what they can afford, that is not insignificant.
The problem ballots cannot solve
Ballots can widen access and prevent ticketing from becoming a permanently closed shop. That is particularly relevant for away games, where younger supporters and those only recently able to travel can find it almost impossible to build enough Black Cat Points. Placing 10 per cent of the general-admission allocation into a Season Ticket Plus ballot gives those supporters another route in. There is merit in that because Sunderland must consider how the next generation can build its own relationship with following the club.
But every attempt to widen access has consequences elsewhere. The remaining 90 per cent will continue through phases one and two of the Black Cat Points process, with leftovers moving into phase three. Supporters who have travelled for years still have priority, but the traditional pool is smaller.
That is sensitive because a small percentage of away allocations are already understood to be distributed through corporate channels. Some committed season-ticket holders will feel squeezed from two directions, particularly those in the second and third phases who have invested considerable time and money.
There is no simple right or wrong answer. A points-based system rewards loyalty but can lock newer supporters out indefinitely. A ballot opens the door to more people but reduces certainty for those who have already demonstrated years of commitment. Sunderland are trying to walk a difficult line between rewarding loyalty and creating opportunity. The argument is not that one group should be favoured over another, but that every change must be explained clearly because the consequences are personal.
The club have responded
Sunderland have since produced a detailed and helpful Q&A. The club have also responded directly to supporter questions, clarifying family applications, Europa League tickets, general-sale arrangements and how the away ballot works alongside Black Cat Points.
Season-ticket holders will not need membership to purchase home Europa League tickets and will receive a priority window. Black Cat Points will continue to cover 90 per cent of general-admission allocations for European away games, while Season Ticket Plus members can enter the ballot for the remaining 10 per cent.
The club have also explained that everyone in a linked group must hold their own membership, that sitting together cannot always be guaranteed and that under-16s must be accompanied by an adult. Those answers have made the scheme easier to understand. But questions remain, demonstrating the inherent complexity of the system. Ballots, different tiers, linked accounts, sales phases and competition-specific arrangements create several points at which supporters can become confused.
Communication was the avoidable problem
The scheme was announced at around 4.15pm and placed on sale at 10am the following morning. That left supporters less than 18 hours to understand a substantial change to the way they may access tickets. The original communication did not answer enough obvious questions. Social media quickly became a bin fire, while journalists were inundated with queries about children, disabled supporters, Europa League fixtures, general sale and Black Cat Points.
A full FAQ should have accompanied the original email release. A video explainer or live social-media Q&A would also have helped supporters understand each tier before they were asked to spend more. Sunderland deserve credit for improving the information afterwards, but clear communication should prevent confusion rather than arrive once it has spread. Ticketing matters because matches are not merely products; they are people’s hobbies, friendships, family traditions and communities.
Some supporters will be delighted with the opportunities provided by the ballots. Others will feel they are paying more for less certainty, while committed away fans may believe their loyalty has been diluted. Those opinions can all be valid. Sunderland cannot create a system that pleases everybody, but they can make every process transparent, demonstrate genuine value and recognise that each additional charge raises a wider question for football supporters.
The immediate uncertainty has eased, but the underlying concern remains: how often can fans be asked to pay more before following their club becomes unaffordable for too many?
Continue Reading