independent.co.uk

Why was Erling Haaland’s goal against Manchester United allowed to stand?

Haaland was ruled to be onside from Josko Gvardiol’s cross, despite the angle of the TV replays suggesting otherwise, while Enzo Fernandez was not found to be interfering with play

Bookmark popover

Erling Haaland celebrates opening the scoring at Old Trafford (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the storyRead moreSupport NowFrom reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.Your support makes all the difference.Read more

Erling Haaland opened the scoring for Manchester City in the derby against Manchester United after a long VAR check.

Haaland was initially ruled to be offside when he tucked in Josko Gvardiol’s deflected cross from the left wing to put City 1-0 up.

However, to much confusion, the striker was then ruled to be onside following a lengthy check from the VAR Matt Donohue.

Haaland was played onside by Patrick Dorgu’s outstretched foot as the Manchester United defender went to close down Gvardiol and attempted to block the cross.

The angle of the initial TV replays appeared to show that Haaland was in an offside position at the back post.

RECOMMENDED

Ukrainian tennis star reveals her family home was hit by Russian missile

Undo

Chris Eubank Jr reacts to Conor Benn’s early loss against Ryan Garcia

Undo

Ask a Pro: "How Long Does $2.5 Million Last in Retirement?"SmartAsset |

SponsoredSponsored

Undo

Create Beautiful Southern Art At HomeTopchicdeals |

SponsoredSponsored

Undo

Powered by TaboolaPowered by Taboola

But the Premier League’s semi-automated offside technology proved that Haaland was in fact behind Dorgu.

The reason the check too so long was because Enzo Fernandez was in an offside position in the penalty box as he also attempted to reach the cross.

The Manchester City midfielder attempted to reach the cross with a diving header, but missed the ball.

Had Fernandez touched the ball he would have been offside, while the VAR also ruled that Fernandez was not interfering with play.

There is an argument that Fernandez put off the United defender Lisandro Martinez, who was between Fernandez and Haaland at the back post.

City were down to 10 men in the Manchester derby following Phil Foden’s first-half red card for kicking out at Bruno Fernandes.

Read full news in source page