Haaland’s winner was given after a lengthy VAR check, with Enzo Fernandez deemed not to be interfering with play as the cross came in
Bookmark popover
open image in galleryErling Haaland’s winner came after a lengthy VAR check for offside (Getty)
Your support helps us to tell the storyRead moreSupport NowFrom reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.Your support makes all the difference.Read more
Gary Neville has claimed that Manchester United can expect “an apology” from Pro Ref after Erling Haaland’s controversial winner in the Manchester derby.
Haaland scored the only goal of the game as he arrived at the back post to bundle past Senne Lammens in the 60th minute, and while the goal was originally disallowed for offside, it was overturned and awarded to the visitors after a lengthy VAR review.
Live reaction: 10-man City win Manchester derby thanks to controversial Haaland goal
There was confusion initially over whether Haaland himself was offside when Josko Gvardiol played the cross, though the Norwegian was eventually proved to be in an onside position. However, the positioning of Enzo Fernandez complicated things, with the Argentine having been offside before making an effort to head the ball before it arrived at the feet of Haaland.
Though Fernandez did not touch the ball himself, there was debate over whether he had interfered with play, though the goal was given.
open image in galleryErling Haaland bundled in in the second half to give 10-man City a memorable away win (Getty)
“VAR checked the referee’s call of no goal for offside – and determined that Haaland was in an onside position and recommended that the goal was awarded,” said the Premier League Match Centre in a post explaining the decision on X.
RECOMMENDED
The three words that reveal how Man City left Man United in the dust
Why was Erling Haaland’s goal against Manchester United allowed to stand?
Ask a Pro: "How Long Does $2.5 Million Last in Retirement?"SmartAsset |
SponsoredSponsored
North Charleston: 24 Hour Dental ImplantsNuvia Dental Implant Center |
SponsoredSponsored
Powered by TaboolaPowered by Taboola
City – who were on the end of their own controversial decision after Phil Foden was sent off for kicking Bruno Fernandes in the first half – went on to win the game 1-0, maintaining their 100 percent winning record this season.
Neville insisted that referee Michael Oliver had got the decision for the goal wrong at the time, saying that “the officials will be nervous” and “will recognise they got this wrong”.
And he had not changed his opinion after full-time, with the former United defender insisting that his old club “will see an apology”.
“They're the words that I think – emphatically – means we will see an apology from Pro Ref," said Neville referring to the wording of the offside rule.
open image in galleryThe win puts City second, behind Arsenal on goal difference alone (Reuters)
"There is no doubt that Enzo is attempting to play the ball and putting Lisandro Martinez off. It’s a really strange one. They’ll recognise they got that wrong,” he explained.
The wording of the offside rule states that a player is offside when interfering with an opponent by “preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision”, or “challenging an opponent for the ball”, as well as if a player is “clearly attempting to play a ball which is close when this action impacts on an opponent”.
Neville added that he expects a "massive inquest into the goal, which I think was wrongly given", having also admitted the goal left him so confused that he "needed the offside rule explained to me”.
Fellow pundit Micah Richards agreed, saying that the officials “have got it so wrong,” but adding that it should take nothing away from a solid City performance.
Roy Keane, meanwhile, felt that United were “punished” for holding a strong line.
The win means Maresca’s side remain unbeaten this season, joining Arsenal on 12 points at the summit of the Premier League table.
They are in League Cup action against Norwich City on Thursday, with their final match before the international break coming at home to Sunderland on 20 September.