The Glazer family are reportedly growing increasingly unhappy with Sir Jim Ratcliffe's management of Manchester United, with sources claiming it is "a travesty and not what they expected or were promised"
BILBAO, SPAIN - MAY 21: Avram Glazer, co owner alongside Sir Jim Ratcliffe, owner of Ineos and co-owner of Manchester United during the UEFA Europa League Final 2025 between Tottenham Hotspur and Manchester United at at Estadio de San Mames on May 21, 2025 in Bilbao, Spain. (Photo by Catherine Ivill - AMA/Getty Images)
The Glazer family are reportedly increasingly frustrated with Sir Jim Ratcliffe's management(Image: Catherine Ivill - AMA/Getty Images)
Sir Jim Ratcliffe is under increasing pressure after the Glazers family have reportedly grown frustrated with his management of Manchester United. Ratcliffe snapped up a 25% minority share in United in 2024 as part of a deal worth around £1.2billion, with his INEOS group taking control of football operations.
However, the Glazers still hold the power over any potential sale of the club. As part of the agreement, Ratcliffe also pledged an additional £245million in investment, bringing his total financial commitment to roughly £1.5billion.
The extra funds were intended to bankroll future infrastructure improvements at Old Trafford, though results on the pitch have shown little sign of genuine improvement. The Glazer family, who continue to monitor events at Old Trafford from afar, are now thought to be deeply disappointed by how the club has been run under Ratcliffe's leadership.
INEOS chairman Sir Jim Ratcliffe reacts on stage during the inauguration of the Greensand carbon capture and storage (CCS) project in Esbjerg, Denmark, on September 18, 2026. Greensand is the first project in the European Union designed to demonstrate a full CCS value chain, including the capture, transport and storage of carbon dioxide in depleted oil and gas reservoirs beneath the North Sea. (Photo by Bo Amstrup / Ritzau Scanpix / AFP via Getty Images) / Denmark OUT
Sir Jim Ratcliffe has failed to improve Manchester United under his control(Image: BO AMSTRUP, Ritzau Scanpix/AFP via Getty Images)
Make sure you never miss the most fun content in sport by making the Daily Star one of your Google preferred sources
A source close to the family told the Mail that "it's a travesty and not what they expected or were promised," adding that "they have never run the club this way". Fans have already pointed out that this seemingly forgets the £1billion of debt the Glazer ownership has dragged United into during their own miserable reign.
Meanwhile, ESPN reported this week that the Glazers believe Ratcliffe "couldn't have masterminded a worse situation", and described his "downgrading in all departments" at Old Trafford as "the opposite of what he said his strategy is".
United's woes have continued on the pitch, with the Red Devils currently mired in an eight-game winless run across all competitions. They have managed just one Premier League victory this season, marking their worst start to a campaign in almost 40 years.
The club sit just two points above the relegation zone ahead of Saturday's clash with Chelsea, heaping further pressure on those in charge of football operations. United's ongoing struggles have also fuelled speculation over the club's true market value.
MANCHESTER, ENGLAND - APRIL 13: Sir Jim Ratcliffe of Manchester United arrives ahead of the Premier League match between Manchester United and Leeds United at Old Trafford on April 13, 2026 in Manchester, England. (Photo by Ash Donelon/Manchester United via Getty Images)
Sir Jim Ratcliffe assumed control of football operations in 2024(Image: Ash Donelon, Manchester United via Getty Images)
The Glazers had previously slapped a $6billion (£4.5billion) price tag on United when entertaining a potential sale four years ago, though that figure now appears increasingly difficult to justify.
Despite this, the American family still hold the cards over any future sale. Under the terms of their 2024 agreement with Ratcliffe, the Glazers have the power to force him to offload his stake, which has since grown to 28 per cent, should they agree to selling the club to a third party.
Ratcliffe would have no power to block such a deal unless he matched the offer and bought the club outright himself – a scenario considered highly unlikely.
Despite reports emerging about the Glazers' dissatisfaction, they are barred from directly buying back Ratcliffe's stake.
However, from next February onwards, the INEOS chief will no longer have the power to prevent the family from selling United at a valuation below the $33 (£25) per share he originally paid.
In the meantime, INEOS has already begun to scale back its football operations elsewhere. Swiss club Lausanne-Sport has become the latest to be put up for sale, while the group has also lowered its asking price for French outfit Nice.